46. Surgical treatment for intracranial metastases

R. Roselli, M. Iacoangeli, A. Pompucci, R. Trignani, A. Albanese, M. Scerrati

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Introduction. We have analysed a consecutive series of patients operated on for intracranial metastases from solid cancer irrespectively of their location (eloquent areas) or uniqueness (multiple lesions). This aggressive treatment should be matched with outpatient procedures like radiosurgery. Materials and methods. The study includes 61 consecutive patients treated from January 1993 to June 1997. Patients with absent, controlled, or limited systemic cancer were considered for aggressive therapy. Standardised operative procedures consisted of linear skin incision, minimal craniotomy and microsurgical resection by ultrasonography-guidance. Post-operative TC or MRI evaluation was obtained in all cases. Results. Median age was 60 yrs (34-74); 42 male and 19 female. Lesions were single in 51 cases and multiple in 10. There was no post-operative mortality and morbidity was 5%. In 7 patients with lesions sited in eloquent areas, no morbidity was observed and 3 of them improved after surgery. All metastases were superficially located and small in size with mean diameter of 2,5 cm. Operative time was within 2 hours for single lesions. Multiple craniotomies, in a single operation, were not associated with a higher post-craniotomy complication or 30-days mortality rates than a single craniotomy. Ninetyfive per cent of cases was disease-free at one month follow-up. Conclusions. Nowadays the morbidity of the minimally invasive microsurgery for small sized, superficially located metastases can be very low (5%). Suitable surgical technique minimising complication rate and improving its effectiveness (local control of disease in 95%) can be comparable with out-patient procedures like radiosurgery. The question of lesions in eloquent areas is an untrue problem: there was no site-related morbidity. One-stage surgery seems to us suitable for multiple lesion (10/61) and repeated operations seem feasible for local recurrence (5/61). The attitude of comparing surgery versus radiosurgery is probably wrong. After gross total removal there is a microscopic residual disease: the ideal condition for radiosurgical sterilisation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)254
Number of pages1
JournalItalian Journal of Neurological Sciences
Volume18
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 1997

Fingerprint

Craniotomy
Radiosurgery
Neoplasm Metastasis
Morbidity
Outpatients
Microsurgery
Mortality
Operative Surgical Procedures
Therapeutics
Operative Time
Ultrasonography
Neoplasms
Recurrence
Skin

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Roselli, R., Iacoangeli, M., Pompucci, A., Trignani, R., Albanese, A., & Scerrati, M. (1997). 46. Surgical treatment for intracranial metastases. Italian Journal of Neurological Sciences, 18(4), 254.

46. Surgical treatment for intracranial metastases. / Roselli, R.; Iacoangeli, M.; Pompucci, A.; Trignani, R.; Albanese, A.; Scerrati, M.

In: Italian Journal of Neurological Sciences, Vol. 18, No. 4, 1997, p. 254.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Roselli, R, Iacoangeli, M, Pompucci, A, Trignani, R, Albanese, A & Scerrati, M 1997, '46. Surgical treatment for intracranial metastases', Italian Journal of Neurological Sciences, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 254.
Roselli R, Iacoangeli M, Pompucci A, Trignani R, Albanese A, Scerrati M. 46. Surgical treatment for intracranial metastases. Italian Journal of Neurological Sciences. 1997;18(4):254.
Roselli, R. ; Iacoangeli, M. ; Pompucci, A. ; Trignani, R. ; Albanese, A. ; Scerrati, M. / 46. Surgical treatment for intracranial metastases. In: Italian Journal of Neurological Sciences. 1997 ; Vol. 18, No. 4. pp. 254.
@article{2f348b8a592b465281523ac865c771e4,
title = "46. Surgical treatment for intracranial metastases",
abstract = "Introduction. We have analysed a consecutive series of patients operated on for intracranial metastases from solid cancer irrespectively of their location (eloquent areas) or uniqueness (multiple lesions). This aggressive treatment should be matched with outpatient procedures like radiosurgery. Materials and methods. The study includes 61 consecutive patients treated from January 1993 to June 1997. Patients with absent, controlled, or limited systemic cancer were considered for aggressive therapy. Standardised operative procedures consisted of linear skin incision, minimal craniotomy and microsurgical resection by ultrasonography-guidance. Post-operative TC or MRI evaluation was obtained in all cases. Results. Median age was 60 yrs (34-74); 42 male and 19 female. Lesions were single in 51 cases and multiple in 10. There was no post-operative mortality and morbidity was 5{\%}. In 7 patients with lesions sited in eloquent areas, no morbidity was observed and 3 of them improved after surgery. All metastases were superficially located and small in size with mean diameter of 2,5 cm. Operative time was within 2 hours for single lesions. Multiple craniotomies, in a single operation, were not associated with a higher post-craniotomy complication or 30-days mortality rates than a single craniotomy. Ninetyfive per cent of cases was disease-free at one month follow-up. Conclusions. Nowadays the morbidity of the minimally invasive microsurgery for small sized, superficially located metastases can be very low (5{\%}). Suitable surgical technique minimising complication rate and improving its effectiveness (local control of disease in 95{\%}) can be comparable with out-patient procedures like radiosurgery. The question of lesions in eloquent areas is an untrue problem: there was no site-related morbidity. One-stage surgery seems to us suitable for multiple lesion (10/61) and repeated operations seem feasible for local recurrence (5/61). The attitude of comparing surgery versus radiosurgery is probably wrong. After gross total removal there is a microscopic residual disease: the ideal condition for radiosurgical sterilisation.",
author = "R. Roselli and M. Iacoangeli and A. Pompucci and R. Trignani and A. Albanese and M. Scerrati",
year = "1997",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "254",
journal = "Italian Journal of Neurological Sciences",
issn = "0392-0461",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - 46. Surgical treatment for intracranial metastases

AU - Roselli, R.

AU - Iacoangeli, M.

AU - Pompucci, A.

AU - Trignani, R.

AU - Albanese, A.

AU - Scerrati, M.

PY - 1997

Y1 - 1997

N2 - Introduction. We have analysed a consecutive series of patients operated on for intracranial metastases from solid cancer irrespectively of their location (eloquent areas) or uniqueness (multiple lesions). This aggressive treatment should be matched with outpatient procedures like radiosurgery. Materials and methods. The study includes 61 consecutive patients treated from January 1993 to June 1997. Patients with absent, controlled, or limited systemic cancer were considered for aggressive therapy. Standardised operative procedures consisted of linear skin incision, minimal craniotomy and microsurgical resection by ultrasonography-guidance. Post-operative TC or MRI evaluation was obtained in all cases. Results. Median age was 60 yrs (34-74); 42 male and 19 female. Lesions were single in 51 cases and multiple in 10. There was no post-operative mortality and morbidity was 5%. In 7 patients with lesions sited in eloquent areas, no morbidity was observed and 3 of them improved after surgery. All metastases were superficially located and small in size with mean diameter of 2,5 cm. Operative time was within 2 hours for single lesions. Multiple craniotomies, in a single operation, were not associated with a higher post-craniotomy complication or 30-days mortality rates than a single craniotomy. Ninetyfive per cent of cases was disease-free at one month follow-up. Conclusions. Nowadays the morbidity of the minimally invasive microsurgery for small sized, superficially located metastases can be very low (5%). Suitable surgical technique minimising complication rate and improving its effectiveness (local control of disease in 95%) can be comparable with out-patient procedures like radiosurgery. The question of lesions in eloquent areas is an untrue problem: there was no site-related morbidity. One-stage surgery seems to us suitable for multiple lesion (10/61) and repeated operations seem feasible for local recurrence (5/61). The attitude of comparing surgery versus radiosurgery is probably wrong. After gross total removal there is a microscopic residual disease: the ideal condition for radiosurgical sterilisation.

AB - Introduction. We have analysed a consecutive series of patients operated on for intracranial metastases from solid cancer irrespectively of their location (eloquent areas) or uniqueness (multiple lesions). This aggressive treatment should be matched with outpatient procedures like radiosurgery. Materials and methods. The study includes 61 consecutive patients treated from January 1993 to June 1997. Patients with absent, controlled, or limited systemic cancer were considered for aggressive therapy. Standardised operative procedures consisted of linear skin incision, minimal craniotomy and microsurgical resection by ultrasonography-guidance. Post-operative TC or MRI evaluation was obtained in all cases. Results. Median age was 60 yrs (34-74); 42 male and 19 female. Lesions were single in 51 cases and multiple in 10. There was no post-operative mortality and morbidity was 5%. In 7 patients with lesions sited in eloquent areas, no morbidity was observed and 3 of them improved after surgery. All metastases were superficially located and small in size with mean diameter of 2,5 cm. Operative time was within 2 hours for single lesions. Multiple craniotomies, in a single operation, were not associated with a higher post-craniotomy complication or 30-days mortality rates than a single craniotomy. Ninetyfive per cent of cases was disease-free at one month follow-up. Conclusions. Nowadays the morbidity of the minimally invasive microsurgery for small sized, superficially located metastases can be very low (5%). Suitable surgical technique minimising complication rate and improving its effectiveness (local control of disease in 95%) can be comparable with out-patient procedures like radiosurgery. The question of lesions in eloquent areas is an untrue problem: there was no site-related morbidity. One-stage surgery seems to us suitable for multiple lesion (10/61) and repeated operations seem feasible for local recurrence (5/61). The attitude of comparing surgery versus radiosurgery is probably wrong. After gross total removal there is a microscopic residual disease: the ideal condition for radiosurgical sterilisation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33746382907&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33746382907&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 254

JO - Italian Journal of Neurological Sciences

JF - Italian Journal of Neurological Sciences

SN - 0392-0461

IS - 4

ER -