Abstract
Background Although dental dilaceration disinclusion is an accepted treatment modality, few studies have evaluated the prognosis for dilacerated maxillary incisors and changes in clinical periodontal parameters still need to be demonstrated. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the prognosis and changes in clinical attachment level (CAL), probing depth (PD), and soft tissue recession (REC) for disincluded dilacerated maxillary incisors. Methods Ten impacted dilacerated teeth were scheduled for disinclusion. Five of them were disincluded with the apically repositioned flap technique and the other five with the closed eruption technique and brought into alignment with light orthodontic forces. Results All the dilacerated teeth were disincluded as planned. CAL, PD, and REC were the same as natural teeth. Among the two surgical techniques, no statistically significant differences have been found. Conclusion The choice to disinclude dilacerated central maxillary incisors reached the goals planned. Periodontal parameters obtained in a short- and long-term follow up allow to affirm that the disinclusion of dilacerated teeth has a good survival rate.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Progress in Orthodontics |
| Volume | 15 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2014 |
Fingerprint
Keywords
- Clinical periodontal parameter
- Dilaceration
- Disinclusion
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Orthodontics
- Medicine(all)
Cite this
A 5-year longitudinal study of survival rate and periodontal parameter changes at sites of dilacerated maxillary central incisors. / Farronato, Giampietro; Giannini, Lucia; Galbiati, Guido; Maspero, Cinzia.
In: Progress in Orthodontics, Vol. 15, No. 1, 2014.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - A 5-year longitudinal study of survival rate and periodontal parameter changes at sites of dilacerated maxillary central incisors
AU - Farronato, Giampietro
AU - Giannini, Lucia
AU - Galbiati, Guido
AU - Maspero, Cinzia
PY - 2014
Y1 - 2014
N2 - Background Although dental dilaceration disinclusion is an accepted treatment modality, few studies have evaluated the prognosis for dilacerated maxillary incisors and changes in clinical periodontal parameters still need to be demonstrated. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the prognosis and changes in clinical attachment level (CAL), probing depth (PD), and soft tissue recession (REC) for disincluded dilacerated maxillary incisors. Methods Ten impacted dilacerated teeth were scheduled for disinclusion. Five of them were disincluded with the apically repositioned flap technique and the other five with the closed eruption technique and brought into alignment with light orthodontic forces. Results All the dilacerated teeth were disincluded as planned. CAL, PD, and REC were the same as natural teeth. Among the two surgical techniques, no statistically significant differences have been found. Conclusion The choice to disinclude dilacerated central maxillary incisors reached the goals planned. Periodontal parameters obtained in a short- and long-term follow up allow to affirm that the disinclusion of dilacerated teeth has a good survival rate.
AB - Background Although dental dilaceration disinclusion is an accepted treatment modality, few studies have evaluated the prognosis for dilacerated maxillary incisors and changes in clinical periodontal parameters still need to be demonstrated. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the prognosis and changes in clinical attachment level (CAL), probing depth (PD), and soft tissue recession (REC) for disincluded dilacerated maxillary incisors. Methods Ten impacted dilacerated teeth were scheduled for disinclusion. Five of them were disincluded with the apically repositioned flap technique and the other five with the closed eruption technique and brought into alignment with light orthodontic forces. Results All the dilacerated teeth were disincluded as planned. CAL, PD, and REC were the same as natural teeth. Among the two surgical techniques, no statistically significant differences have been found. Conclusion The choice to disinclude dilacerated central maxillary incisors reached the goals planned. Periodontal parameters obtained in a short- and long-term follow up allow to affirm that the disinclusion of dilacerated teeth has a good survival rate.
KW - Clinical periodontal parameter
KW - Dilaceration
KW - Disinclusion
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84892506381&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84892506381&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/2196-1042-15-3
DO - 10.1186/2196-1042-15-3
M3 - Article
C2 - 24393572
AN - SCOPUS:84892506381
VL - 15
JO - Progress in Orthodontics
JF - Progress in Orthodontics
SN - 1723-7785
IS - 1
ER -