TY - JOUR
T1 - A 6-month randomized clinical trial of bimatoprost 0.03% versus the association of timolol 0.5% and latanoprost 0.005% in glaucomatous patients
AU - Manni, Gianluca
AU - Centofanti, Marco
AU - Parravano, Mariacristina
AU - Oddone, Francesco
AU - Bucci, Massimo G.
PY - 2004/9
Y1 - 2004/9
N2 - Background: New effective hypotensive agents have been recently introduced into clinical practice, but often more than one drug has to be used to prevent further visual field loss. The aim of this study was to evaluate the intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering efficacy and safety of bimatoprost 0.03% compared with the association of timolol 0.5% and latanoprost 0.005% in open-angle glaucoma patients. Methods: In this 6-month, prospective, parallel, randomised, investigator-masked clinical trial, 61 glaucomatous patients treated with timolol 0.5% twice in both eyes were enrolled. The timolol 0.5% was replaced by bimatoprost 0.03% once daily (group I) or by latanoprost 0.005% plus timolol 0.5% (group II). IOP measurements were performed at the baseline visit and at days 15, 30, 60, 90, 120 and 180. Digital colour photography was used to evaluate topical side effects. Results: Fifty-six of the 61 patients were included for the intent-to-treat analysis (28 in group I and 28 in group II). Baseline mean IOP was similar in the two groups (p=0.5). Both treatments lowered the mean IOP at every visit significantly compared with the baseline (p
AB - Background: New effective hypotensive agents have been recently introduced into clinical practice, but often more than one drug has to be used to prevent further visual field loss. The aim of this study was to evaluate the intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering efficacy and safety of bimatoprost 0.03% compared with the association of timolol 0.5% and latanoprost 0.005% in open-angle glaucoma patients. Methods: In this 6-month, prospective, parallel, randomised, investigator-masked clinical trial, 61 glaucomatous patients treated with timolol 0.5% twice in both eyes were enrolled. The timolol 0.5% was replaced by bimatoprost 0.03% once daily (group I) or by latanoprost 0.005% plus timolol 0.5% (group II). IOP measurements were performed at the baseline visit and at days 15, 30, 60, 90, 120 and 180. Digital colour photography was used to evaluate topical side effects. Results: Fifty-six of the 61 patients were included for the intent-to-treat analysis (28 in group I and 28 in group II). Baseline mean IOP was similar in the two groups (p=0.5). Both treatments lowered the mean IOP at every visit significantly compared with the baseline (p
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=6344231803&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=6344231803&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00417-004-0866-2
DO - 10.1007/s00417-004-0866-2
M3 - Article
C2 - 15241611
AN - SCOPUS:6344231803
VL - 242
SP - 767
EP - 770
JO - Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology
JF - Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology
SN - 0721-832X
IS - 9
ER -