A basic diagnostic headache diary (BDHD) is well accepted and useful in the diagnosis of headache. A multicentre European and Latin American study

R. Jensen, C. Tassorelli, P. Rossi, M. Allena, V. Osipova, T. J. Steiner, G. Sandrini, J. Olesen, G. Nappi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

35 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aims: We tested the usability and usefulness of the basic diagnostic headache diary (BDHD) for the diagnosis of migraine, tension-type headache and medication-overuse headache in European and Latin American countries.Methods: Patients were subdivided into two groups according to a 1:1 randomization list. Those in group 1 were sent the BDHD before their first visit to the headache centre and asked to complete it for at least 1 month. Those in group 2 made their first visit to the headache centre without receiving the BDHD.Results: A total of 626 patients from nine countries and 16 centres completed the study. The BDHD entries were complete in 97.5% of cases. BDHD information and clinical interview were, when taken together, considered complete for diagnosis in 97.7% of cases in group 1 whereas the information obtained by clinical interview alone in group 2 was considered complete in only 86.8% of cases (p <0.001). The median number of diagnoses per patient in group 1 was significantly higher than in group 2 (p = 0.04). The BDHD was very well accepted by both patients and doctors.Conclusions: It is concluded that the BDHD is a useful tool in the diagnostic assessment of the most frequent and disabling forms of primary headache and in headache management.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1549-1560
Number of pages12
JournalCephalalgia
Volume31
Issue number15
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2011

Fingerprint

Headache
Secondary Headache Disorders
Interviews
Tension-Type Headache
Random Allocation
Migraine Disorders

Keywords

  • diagnostic support
  • Diary
  • medication-overuse headache
  • migraine
  • tension-type

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

A basic diagnostic headache diary (BDHD) is well accepted and useful in the diagnosis of headache. A multicentre European and Latin American study. / Jensen, R.; Tassorelli, C.; Rossi, P.; Allena, M.; Osipova, V.; Steiner, T. J.; Sandrini, G.; Olesen, J.; Nappi, G.

In: Cephalalgia, Vol. 31, No. 15, 11.2011, p. 1549-1560.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Jensen, R. ; Tassorelli, C. ; Rossi, P. ; Allena, M. ; Osipova, V. ; Steiner, T. J. ; Sandrini, G. ; Olesen, J. ; Nappi, G. / A basic diagnostic headache diary (BDHD) is well accepted and useful in the diagnosis of headache. A multicentre European and Latin American study. In: Cephalalgia. 2011 ; Vol. 31, No. 15. pp. 1549-1560.
@article{3b9a3db26a7241a688381cc0d97eb577,
title = "A basic diagnostic headache diary (BDHD) is well accepted and useful in the diagnosis of headache. A multicentre European and Latin American study",
abstract = "Aims: We tested the usability and usefulness of the basic diagnostic headache diary (BDHD) for the diagnosis of migraine, tension-type headache and medication-overuse headache in European and Latin American countries.Methods: Patients were subdivided into two groups according to a 1:1 randomization list. Those in group 1 were sent the BDHD before their first visit to the headache centre and asked to complete it for at least 1 month. Those in group 2 made their first visit to the headache centre without receiving the BDHD.Results: A total of 626 patients from nine countries and 16 centres completed the study. The BDHD entries were complete in 97.5{\%} of cases. BDHD information and clinical interview were, when taken together, considered complete for diagnosis in 97.7{\%} of cases in group 1 whereas the information obtained by clinical interview alone in group 2 was considered complete in only 86.8{\%} of cases (p <0.001). The median number of diagnoses per patient in group 1 was significantly higher than in group 2 (p = 0.04). The BDHD was very well accepted by both patients and doctors.Conclusions: It is concluded that the BDHD is a useful tool in the diagnostic assessment of the most frequent and disabling forms of primary headache and in headache management.",
keywords = "diagnostic support, Diary, medication-overuse headache, migraine, tension-type",
author = "R. Jensen and C. Tassorelli and P. Rossi and M. Allena and V. Osipova and Steiner, {T. J.} and G. Sandrini and J. Olesen and G. Nappi",
year = "2011",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1177/0333102411424212",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "1549--1560",
journal = "Cephalalgia",
issn = "0333-1024",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "15",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A basic diagnostic headache diary (BDHD) is well accepted and useful in the diagnosis of headache. A multicentre European and Latin American study

AU - Jensen, R.

AU - Tassorelli, C.

AU - Rossi, P.

AU - Allena, M.

AU - Osipova, V.

AU - Steiner, T. J.

AU - Sandrini, G.

AU - Olesen, J.

AU - Nappi, G.

PY - 2011/11

Y1 - 2011/11

N2 - Aims: We tested the usability and usefulness of the basic diagnostic headache diary (BDHD) for the diagnosis of migraine, tension-type headache and medication-overuse headache in European and Latin American countries.Methods: Patients were subdivided into two groups according to a 1:1 randomization list. Those in group 1 were sent the BDHD before their first visit to the headache centre and asked to complete it for at least 1 month. Those in group 2 made their first visit to the headache centre without receiving the BDHD.Results: A total of 626 patients from nine countries and 16 centres completed the study. The BDHD entries were complete in 97.5% of cases. BDHD information and clinical interview were, when taken together, considered complete for diagnosis in 97.7% of cases in group 1 whereas the information obtained by clinical interview alone in group 2 was considered complete in only 86.8% of cases (p <0.001). The median number of diagnoses per patient in group 1 was significantly higher than in group 2 (p = 0.04). The BDHD was very well accepted by both patients and doctors.Conclusions: It is concluded that the BDHD is a useful tool in the diagnostic assessment of the most frequent and disabling forms of primary headache and in headache management.

AB - Aims: We tested the usability and usefulness of the basic diagnostic headache diary (BDHD) for the diagnosis of migraine, tension-type headache and medication-overuse headache in European and Latin American countries.Methods: Patients were subdivided into two groups according to a 1:1 randomization list. Those in group 1 were sent the BDHD before their first visit to the headache centre and asked to complete it for at least 1 month. Those in group 2 made their first visit to the headache centre without receiving the BDHD.Results: A total of 626 patients from nine countries and 16 centres completed the study. The BDHD entries were complete in 97.5% of cases. BDHD information and clinical interview were, when taken together, considered complete for diagnosis in 97.7% of cases in group 1 whereas the information obtained by clinical interview alone in group 2 was considered complete in only 86.8% of cases (p <0.001). The median number of diagnoses per patient in group 1 was significantly higher than in group 2 (p = 0.04). The BDHD was very well accepted by both patients and doctors.Conclusions: It is concluded that the BDHD is a useful tool in the diagnostic assessment of the most frequent and disabling forms of primary headache and in headache management.

KW - diagnostic support

KW - Diary

KW - medication-overuse headache

KW - migraine

KW - tension-type

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=81855180655&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=81855180655&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0333102411424212

DO - 10.1177/0333102411424212

M3 - Article

C2 - 22019575

AN - SCOPUS:81855180655

VL - 31

SP - 1549

EP - 1560

JO - Cephalalgia

JF - Cephalalgia

SN - 0333-1024

IS - 15

ER -