A biomechanical and histological analysis of standard versus hydroxyapatite-coated pins for external fixation

Antonio Moroni, Matteo Cadossi, Matteo Romagnoli, Cesare Faldini, Sandro Giannini

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This sheep study was designed to make a comparative evaluation of two external fixation pin types each with and without hydroxyapatite (HA) coating. The two pins had different taper, pitch, and self drilling capabilities. Twenty Orthofix standard, self-tapping pins (group A), 20 Orthofix HA-coated, self-tapping pins (group B), 20 X-caliber, self-drilling, self-tapping pins (group C), and 20 X-caliber HA-coated, self-drilling, self-tapping pins (group D) were selected. Four pins were implanted in the right femurs of 20 adult sheep that were euthanized at 6 weeks. Mean pin insertion torque was 2745 ± 822 Nmm in group A, 2726 ± 784 Nmm in group B, 2818 ± 552 Nmm in group C, and 2657 ± 732 Nmm in group D (ns). Mean pin extraction torque was 1567 ± 541 Nmm in group A, 2524 ± 838 Nmm in group B, 1650 ± 650 Nmm in group C, and 2517 ± 726 Nmm in group D. HA-coated pins (group B and D) had a significantly greater mean pin extraction torque compared to similar uncoated pins (group A and C) (p <0.0005). Histological analysis showed good osteointegration of the two coated pin types. This study shows that HA-coating is more important for optimal pin fixation than the particular combination of design parameters used in each pin type.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)417-421
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterials
Volume86
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2008

Fingerprint

Durapatite
Hydroxyapatite
Torque
Drilling
Sheep
Coatings
Femur

Keywords

  • Bone
  • External fixation
  • Hydroxyapatite
  • Interface
  • Pin
  • Torque

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Biomaterials

Cite this

A biomechanical and histological analysis of standard versus hydroxyapatite-coated pins for external fixation. / Moroni, Antonio; Cadossi, Matteo; Romagnoli, Matteo; Faldini, Cesare; Giannini, Sandro.

In: Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterials, Vol. 86, No. 2, 08.2008, p. 417-421.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{466bd709c1c04b3bb62cd60f7c6b52da,
title = "A biomechanical and histological analysis of standard versus hydroxyapatite-coated pins for external fixation",
abstract = "This sheep study was designed to make a comparative evaluation of two external fixation pin types each with and without hydroxyapatite (HA) coating. The two pins had different taper, pitch, and self drilling capabilities. Twenty Orthofix standard, self-tapping pins (group A), 20 Orthofix HA-coated, self-tapping pins (group B), 20 X-caliber, self-drilling, self-tapping pins (group C), and 20 X-caliber HA-coated, self-drilling, self-tapping pins (group D) were selected. Four pins were implanted in the right femurs of 20 adult sheep that were euthanized at 6 weeks. Mean pin insertion torque was 2745 ± 822 Nmm in group A, 2726 ± 784 Nmm in group B, 2818 ± 552 Nmm in group C, and 2657 ± 732 Nmm in group D (ns). Mean pin extraction torque was 1567 ± 541 Nmm in group A, 2524 ± 838 Nmm in group B, 1650 ± 650 Nmm in group C, and 2517 ± 726 Nmm in group D. HA-coated pins (group B and D) had a significantly greater mean pin extraction torque compared to similar uncoated pins (group A and C) (p <0.0005). Histological analysis showed good osteointegration of the two coated pin types. This study shows that HA-coating is more important for optimal pin fixation than the particular combination of design parameters used in each pin type.",
keywords = "Bone, External fixation, Hydroxyapatite, Interface, Pin, Torque",
author = "Antonio Moroni and Matteo Cadossi and Matteo Romagnoli and Cesare Faldini and Sandro Giannini",
year = "2008",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1002/jbm.b.31036",
language = "English",
volume = "86",
pages = "417--421",
journal = "Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part A",
issn = "1549-3296",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A biomechanical and histological analysis of standard versus hydroxyapatite-coated pins for external fixation

AU - Moroni, Antonio

AU - Cadossi, Matteo

AU - Romagnoli, Matteo

AU - Faldini, Cesare

AU - Giannini, Sandro

PY - 2008/8

Y1 - 2008/8

N2 - This sheep study was designed to make a comparative evaluation of two external fixation pin types each with and without hydroxyapatite (HA) coating. The two pins had different taper, pitch, and self drilling capabilities. Twenty Orthofix standard, self-tapping pins (group A), 20 Orthofix HA-coated, self-tapping pins (group B), 20 X-caliber, self-drilling, self-tapping pins (group C), and 20 X-caliber HA-coated, self-drilling, self-tapping pins (group D) were selected. Four pins were implanted in the right femurs of 20 adult sheep that were euthanized at 6 weeks. Mean pin insertion torque was 2745 ± 822 Nmm in group A, 2726 ± 784 Nmm in group B, 2818 ± 552 Nmm in group C, and 2657 ± 732 Nmm in group D (ns). Mean pin extraction torque was 1567 ± 541 Nmm in group A, 2524 ± 838 Nmm in group B, 1650 ± 650 Nmm in group C, and 2517 ± 726 Nmm in group D. HA-coated pins (group B and D) had a significantly greater mean pin extraction torque compared to similar uncoated pins (group A and C) (p <0.0005). Histological analysis showed good osteointegration of the two coated pin types. This study shows that HA-coating is more important for optimal pin fixation than the particular combination of design parameters used in each pin type.

AB - This sheep study was designed to make a comparative evaluation of two external fixation pin types each with and without hydroxyapatite (HA) coating. The two pins had different taper, pitch, and self drilling capabilities. Twenty Orthofix standard, self-tapping pins (group A), 20 Orthofix HA-coated, self-tapping pins (group B), 20 X-caliber, self-drilling, self-tapping pins (group C), and 20 X-caliber HA-coated, self-drilling, self-tapping pins (group D) were selected. Four pins were implanted in the right femurs of 20 adult sheep that were euthanized at 6 weeks. Mean pin insertion torque was 2745 ± 822 Nmm in group A, 2726 ± 784 Nmm in group B, 2818 ± 552 Nmm in group C, and 2657 ± 732 Nmm in group D (ns). Mean pin extraction torque was 1567 ± 541 Nmm in group A, 2524 ± 838 Nmm in group B, 1650 ± 650 Nmm in group C, and 2517 ± 726 Nmm in group D. HA-coated pins (group B and D) had a significantly greater mean pin extraction torque compared to similar uncoated pins (group A and C) (p <0.0005). Histological analysis showed good osteointegration of the two coated pin types. This study shows that HA-coating is more important for optimal pin fixation than the particular combination of design parameters used in each pin type.

KW - Bone

KW - External fixation

KW - Hydroxyapatite

KW - Interface

KW - Pin

KW - Torque

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=47949123687&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=47949123687&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/jbm.b.31036

DO - 10.1002/jbm.b.31036

M3 - Article

C2 - 18286593

AN - SCOPUS:47949123687

VL - 86

SP - 417

EP - 421

JO - Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part A

JF - Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part A

SN - 1549-3296

IS - 2

ER -