A comparison of 'errorless' and 'trial-and-error' learning methods for teaching individuals with acquired memory deficits

Jonathan J. Evans, Barbara A. Wilson, Uwe Schuri, Jackie Andrade, Alan Baddeley, Olga Bruna, Tony Canavan, Sergio Della Sala, Robin Green, Ritva Laaksonen, Lorena Lorenzi, Irene Taussik

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

171 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We present nine experiments, in three study phases, which test the hypothesis that learning methods which prevent the making of errors ('errorless learning') will lead to greater learning than 'trial-and-error' learning methods amongst individuals who are memory impaired as a result of acquired brain injury. Results suggest that tasks and situations which facilitate retrieval of implicit memory for the learned material (such as learning names with a first letter cue) will benefit from errorless learning methods, whilst those that require the explicit recall of novel associations (such as learning routes or programming an electronic organiser) will not benefit from errorless learning. The more severely amnesic patients benefit to a greater extent from errorless learning methods than those who are less severely memory impaired, but this may only apply when the interval between learning and recall is relatively short.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)67-101
Number of pages35
JournalNeuropsychological Rehabilitation
Volume10
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2000

Fingerprint

Memory Disorders
Teaching
Learning
Brain Injuries
Names
Cues

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)
  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Evans, J. J., Wilson, B. A., Schuri, U., Andrade, J., Baddeley, A., Bruna, O., ... Taussik, I. (2000). A comparison of 'errorless' and 'trial-and-error' learning methods for teaching individuals with acquired memory deficits. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 10(1), 67-101.

A comparison of 'errorless' and 'trial-and-error' learning methods for teaching individuals with acquired memory deficits. / Evans, Jonathan J.; Wilson, Barbara A.; Schuri, Uwe; Andrade, Jackie; Baddeley, Alan; Bruna, Olga; Canavan, Tony; Sala, Sergio Della; Green, Robin; Laaksonen, Ritva; Lorenzi, Lorena; Taussik, Irene.

In: Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, Vol. 10, No. 1, 01.2000, p. 67-101.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Evans, JJ, Wilson, BA, Schuri, U, Andrade, J, Baddeley, A, Bruna, O, Canavan, T, Sala, SD, Green, R, Laaksonen, R, Lorenzi, L & Taussik, I 2000, 'A comparison of 'errorless' and 'trial-and-error' learning methods for teaching individuals with acquired memory deficits', Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 67-101.
Evans, Jonathan J. ; Wilson, Barbara A. ; Schuri, Uwe ; Andrade, Jackie ; Baddeley, Alan ; Bruna, Olga ; Canavan, Tony ; Sala, Sergio Della ; Green, Robin ; Laaksonen, Ritva ; Lorenzi, Lorena ; Taussik, Irene. / A comparison of 'errorless' and 'trial-and-error' learning methods for teaching individuals with acquired memory deficits. In: Neuropsychological Rehabilitation. 2000 ; Vol. 10, No. 1. pp. 67-101.
@article{f5bdf5cdb45548f8b4a821cd0417d099,
title = "A comparison of 'errorless' and 'trial-and-error' learning methods for teaching individuals with acquired memory deficits",
abstract = "We present nine experiments, in three study phases, which test the hypothesis that learning methods which prevent the making of errors ('errorless learning') will lead to greater learning than 'trial-and-error' learning methods amongst individuals who are memory impaired as a result of acquired brain injury. Results suggest that tasks and situations which facilitate retrieval of implicit memory for the learned material (such as learning names with a first letter cue) will benefit from errorless learning methods, whilst those that require the explicit recall of novel associations (such as learning routes or programming an electronic organiser) will not benefit from errorless learning. The more severely amnesic patients benefit to a greater extent from errorless learning methods than those who are less severely memory impaired, but this may only apply when the interval between learning and recall is relatively short.",
author = "Evans, {Jonathan J.} and Wilson, {Barbara A.} and Uwe Schuri and Jackie Andrade and Alan Baddeley and Olga Bruna and Tony Canavan and Sala, {Sergio Della} and Robin Green and Ritva Laaksonen and Lorena Lorenzi and Irene Taussik",
year = "2000",
month = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "67--101",
journal = "Neuropsychological Rehabilitation",
issn = "0960-2011",
publisher = "Psychology Press Ltd",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparison of 'errorless' and 'trial-and-error' learning methods for teaching individuals with acquired memory deficits

AU - Evans, Jonathan J.

AU - Wilson, Barbara A.

AU - Schuri, Uwe

AU - Andrade, Jackie

AU - Baddeley, Alan

AU - Bruna, Olga

AU - Canavan, Tony

AU - Sala, Sergio Della

AU - Green, Robin

AU - Laaksonen, Ritva

AU - Lorenzi, Lorena

AU - Taussik, Irene

PY - 2000/1

Y1 - 2000/1

N2 - We present nine experiments, in three study phases, which test the hypothesis that learning methods which prevent the making of errors ('errorless learning') will lead to greater learning than 'trial-and-error' learning methods amongst individuals who are memory impaired as a result of acquired brain injury. Results suggest that tasks and situations which facilitate retrieval of implicit memory for the learned material (such as learning names with a first letter cue) will benefit from errorless learning methods, whilst those that require the explicit recall of novel associations (such as learning routes or programming an electronic organiser) will not benefit from errorless learning. The more severely amnesic patients benefit to a greater extent from errorless learning methods than those who are less severely memory impaired, but this may only apply when the interval between learning and recall is relatively short.

AB - We present nine experiments, in three study phases, which test the hypothesis that learning methods which prevent the making of errors ('errorless learning') will lead to greater learning than 'trial-and-error' learning methods amongst individuals who are memory impaired as a result of acquired brain injury. Results suggest that tasks and situations which facilitate retrieval of implicit memory for the learned material (such as learning names with a first letter cue) will benefit from errorless learning methods, whilst those that require the explicit recall of novel associations (such as learning routes or programming an electronic organiser) will not benefit from errorless learning. The more severely amnesic patients benefit to a greater extent from errorless learning methods than those who are less severely memory impaired, but this may only apply when the interval between learning and recall is relatively short.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033967362&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033967362&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0033967362

VL - 10

SP - 67

EP - 101

JO - Neuropsychological Rehabilitation

JF - Neuropsychological Rehabilitation

SN - 0960-2011

IS - 1

ER -