A consensus for the development of a vector model to assess clinical complexity

Gino Roberto Corazza, Catherine Klersy, Pietro Formagnana, Marco Vincenzo Lenti, Donatella Padula, Simone Baratto, Federico Biagi, Irene Benedetti, Giampiera Bertolino, Elisa Bonadeo, Alessandra Carenzo, Rachele Ciccocioppo, Sara Cutti, Maurizio Daccò, Michele Di Stefano, Francesco Falaschi, Michela Masotti, Emanuela Miceli, Cristina Orsi, Antonella PalettiPierluigi Politi, Antonella Riva, Melania Scarmato, Elisa Spairani, Denis Verrini, For the Consensus Panel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The progressive rise in multimorbidity has made management of complex patients one of the most topical and challenging issues in medicine, both in clinical practice and for healthcare organizations. To make this easier, a score of clinical complexity (CC) would be useful. A vector model to evaluate biological and extra-biological (socio-economic, cultural, behavioural, environmental) domains of CC was proposed a few years ago. However, given that the variables that grade each domain had never been defined, this model has never been used in clinical practice. To overcome these limits, a consensus meeting was organised to grade each domain of CC, and to establish the hierarchy of the domains. A one-day consensus meeting consisting of a multi-professional panel of 25 people was held at our Hospital. In a preliminary phase, the proponents selected seven variables as qualifiers for each of the five above-mentioned domains. In the course of the meeting, the panel voted for five variables considered to be the most representative for each domain. Consensus was established with 2/3 agreement, and all variables were dichotomised. Finally, the various domains were parametrized and ranked within a feasible vector model. A Clinical Complexity Index was set up using the chosen variables. All the domains were graphically represented through a vector model: the biological domain was chosen as the most significant (highest slope), followed by the behavioural and socio-economic domains (intermediate slope), and lastly by the cultural and environmental ones (lowest slope). A feasible and comprehensive tool to evaluate CC in clinical practice is proposed herein.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1313-1318
Number of pages6
JournalInternal and Emergency Medicine
Volume12
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 1 2017

Fingerprint

Consensus
Behavioral Economics
Biological Models
Comorbidity
Economics
Medicine
Organizations
Delivery of Health Care

Keywords

  • Comorbidity
  • Internal medicine
  • Medical decision making
  • Patient complexity
  • Polytherapy
  • Quality of healthcare

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine
  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

A consensus for the development of a vector model to assess clinical complexity. / Corazza, Gino Roberto; Klersy, Catherine; Formagnana, Pietro; Lenti, Marco Vincenzo; Padula, Donatella; Baratto, Simone; Biagi, Federico; Benedetti, Irene; Bertolino, Giampiera; Bonadeo, Elisa; Carenzo, Alessandra; Ciccocioppo, Rachele; Cutti, Sara; Daccò, Maurizio; Di Stefano, Michele; Falaschi, Francesco; Masotti, Michela; Miceli, Emanuela; Orsi, Cristina; Paletti, Antonella; Politi, Pierluigi; Riva, Antonella; Scarmato, Melania; Spairani, Elisa; Verrini, Denis; For the Consensus Panel.

In: Internal and Emergency Medicine, Vol. 12, No. 8, 01.12.2017, p. 1313-1318.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Corazza, GR, Klersy, C, Formagnana, P, Lenti, MV, Padula, D, Baratto, S, Biagi, F, Benedetti, I, Bertolino, G, Bonadeo, E, Carenzo, A, Ciccocioppo, R, Cutti, S, Daccò, M, Di Stefano, M, Falaschi, F, Masotti, M, Miceli, E, Orsi, C, Paletti, A, Politi, P, Riva, A, Scarmato, M, Spairani, E, Verrini, D & For the Consensus Panel 2017, 'A consensus for the development of a vector model to assess clinical complexity', Internal and Emergency Medicine, vol. 12, no. 8, pp. 1313-1318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-017-1709-6
Corazza, Gino Roberto ; Klersy, Catherine ; Formagnana, Pietro ; Lenti, Marco Vincenzo ; Padula, Donatella ; Baratto, Simone ; Biagi, Federico ; Benedetti, Irene ; Bertolino, Giampiera ; Bonadeo, Elisa ; Carenzo, Alessandra ; Ciccocioppo, Rachele ; Cutti, Sara ; Daccò, Maurizio ; Di Stefano, Michele ; Falaschi, Francesco ; Masotti, Michela ; Miceli, Emanuela ; Orsi, Cristina ; Paletti, Antonella ; Politi, Pierluigi ; Riva, Antonella ; Scarmato, Melania ; Spairani, Elisa ; Verrini, Denis ; For the Consensus Panel. / A consensus for the development of a vector model to assess clinical complexity. In: Internal and Emergency Medicine. 2017 ; Vol. 12, No. 8. pp. 1313-1318.
@article{05a9dfe8425d40d2af917348c2c825e1,
title = "A consensus for the development of a vector model to assess clinical complexity",
abstract = "The progressive rise in multimorbidity has made management of complex patients one of the most topical and challenging issues in medicine, both in clinical practice and for healthcare organizations. To make this easier, a score of clinical complexity (CC) would be useful. A vector model to evaluate biological and extra-biological (socio-economic, cultural, behavioural, environmental) domains of CC was proposed a few years ago. However, given that the variables that grade each domain had never been defined, this model has never been used in clinical practice. To overcome these limits, a consensus meeting was organised to grade each domain of CC, and to establish the hierarchy of the domains. A one-day consensus meeting consisting of a multi-professional panel of 25 people was held at our Hospital. In a preliminary phase, the proponents selected seven variables as qualifiers for each of the five above-mentioned domains. In the course of the meeting, the panel voted for five variables considered to be the most representative for each domain. Consensus was established with 2/3 agreement, and all variables were dichotomised. Finally, the various domains were parametrized and ranked within a feasible vector model. A Clinical Complexity Index was set up using the chosen variables. All the domains were graphically represented through a vector model: the biological domain was chosen as the most significant (highest slope), followed by the behavioural and socio-economic domains (intermediate slope), and lastly by the cultural and environmental ones (lowest slope). A feasible and comprehensive tool to evaluate CC in clinical practice is proposed herein.",
keywords = "Comorbidity, Internal medicine, Medical decision making, Patient complexity, Polytherapy, Quality of healthcare",
author = "Corazza, {Gino Roberto} and Catherine Klersy and Pietro Formagnana and Lenti, {Marco Vincenzo} and Donatella Padula and Simone Baratto and Federico Biagi and Irene Benedetti and Giampiera Bertolino and Elisa Bonadeo and Alessandra Carenzo and Rachele Ciccocioppo and Sara Cutti and Maurizio Dacc{\`o} and {Di Stefano}, Michele and Francesco Falaschi and Michela Masotti and Emanuela Miceli and Cristina Orsi and Antonella Paletti and Pierluigi Politi and Antonella Riva and Melania Scarmato and Elisa Spairani and Denis Verrini and {For the Consensus Panel}",
year = "2017",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11739-017-1709-6",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "1313--1318",
journal = "Internal and Emergency Medicine",
issn = "1828-0447",
publisher = "Springer-Verlag Italia s.r.l.",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A consensus for the development of a vector model to assess clinical complexity

AU - Corazza, Gino Roberto

AU - Klersy, Catherine

AU - Formagnana, Pietro

AU - Lenti, Marco Vincenzo

AU - Padula, Donatella

AU - Baratto, Simone

AU - Biagi, Federico

AU - Benedetti, Irene

AU - Bertolino, Giampiera

AU - Bonadeo, Elisa

AU - Carenzo, Alessandra

AU - Ciccocioppo, Rachele

AU - Cutti, Sara

AU - Daccò, Maurizio

AU - Di Stefano, Michele

AU - Falaschi, Francesco

AU - Masotti, Michela

AU - Miceli, Emanuela

AU - Orsi, Cristina

AU - Paletti, Antonella

AU - Politi, Pierluigi

AU - Riva, Antonella

AU - Scarmato, Melania

AU - Spairani, Elisa

AU - Verrini, Denis

AU - For the Consensus Panel

PY - 2017/12/1

Y1 - 2017/12/1

N2 - The progressive rise in multimorbidity has made management of complex patients one of the most topical and challenging issues in medicine, both in clinical practice and for healthcare organizations. To make this easier, a score of clinical complexity (CC) would be useful. A vector model to evaluate biological and extra-biological (socio-economic, cultural, behavioural, environmental) domains of CC was proposed a few years ago. However, given that the variables that grade each domain had never been defined, this model has never been used in clinical practice. To overcome these limits, a consensus meeting was organised to grade each domain of CC, and to establish the hierarchy of the domains. A one-day consensus meeting consisting of a multi-professional panel of 25 people was held at our Hospital. In a preliminary phase, the proponents selected seven variables as qualifiers for each of the five above-mentioned domains. In the course of the meeting, the panel voted for five variables considered to be the most representative for each domain. Consensus was established with 2/3 agreement, and all variables were dichotomised. Finally, the various domains were parametrized and ranked within a feasible vector model. A Clinical Complexity Index was set up using the chosen variables. All the domains were graphically represented through a vector model: the biological domain was chosen as the most significant (highest slope), followed by the behavioural and socio-economic domains (intermediate slope), and lastly by the cultural and environmental ones (lowest slope). A feasible and comprehensive tool to evaluate CC in clinical practice is proposed herein.

AB - The progressive rise in multimorbidity has made management of complex patients one of the most topical and challenging issues in medicine, both in clinical practice and for healthcare organizations. To make this easier, a score of clinical complexity (CC) would be useful. A vector model to evaluate biological and extra-biological (socio-economic, cultural, behavioural, environmental) domains of CC was proposed a few years ago. However, given that the variables that grade each domain had never been defined, this model has never been used in clinical practice. To overcome these limits, a consensus meeting was organised to grade each domain of CC, and to establish the hierarchy of the domains. A one-day consensus meeting consisting of a multi-professional panel of 25 people was held at our Hospital. In a preliminary phase, the proponents selected seven variables as qualifiers for each of the five above-mentioned domains. In the course of the meeting, the panel voted for five variables considered to be the most representative for each domain. Consensus was established with 2/3 agreement, and all variables were dichotomised. Finally, the various domains were parametrized and ranked within a feasible vector model. A Clinical Complexity Index was set up using the chosen variables. All the domains were graphically represented through a vector model: the biological domain was chosen as the most significant (highest slope), followed by the behavioural and socio-economic domains (intermediate slope), and lastly by the cultural and environmental ones (lowest slope). A feasible and comprehensive tool to evaluate CC in clinical practice is proposed herein.

KW - Comorbidity

KW - Internal medicine

KW - Medical decision making

KW - Patient complexity

KW - Polytherapy

KW - Quality of healthcare

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85023763269&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85023763269&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11739-017-1709-6

DO - 10.1007/s11739-017-1709-6

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85023763269

VL - 12

SP - 1313

EP - 1318

JO - Internal and Emergency Medicine

JF - Internal and Emergency Medicine

SN - 1828-0447

IS - 8

ER -