A double-blinded, randomized comparison of either 0.5% levobupivacaine or 0.5% ropivacaine for sciatic nerve block

Andrea Casati, Battista Borghi, Guido Fanelli, Elisa Cerchierini, Roberta Santorsola, Valeria Sassoli, Crispino Grispigni, Giorgio Torri

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

67 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

To compare intraoperative and postoperative clinical properties of levobupivacaine and ropivacaine for sciatic nerve block, 50 ASA physical status I and II patients undergoing hallux valgus repair received a femoral nerve block with 15 mL of 2% mepivacaine. They were then randomly allocated in a double-blinded fashion to receive a sciatic nerve block with either 0.5% levobupivacaine (n = 25) or 0.5% ropivacaine (n = 25). An independent blinded observer evaluated the onset time of surgical anesthesia as well as the quality of the surgical block and postoperative analgesia. The median (range) onset time of surgical block at the sciatic nerve distribution was 30 min (5-60 min) with levobupivacaine and 15 min (5-60 min) with ropivacaine (P = 0.63). Four patients (two patients in each group) received a supplementary ankle block by the surgeon just before the beginning of surgery. All four patients also received IV fentanyl supplementation, but in three of them, propofolinfusion was required to complete surgery (two in the Levobupivacaine group [8%] and one in the Ropivacaine group [4%]; P = 0.99). In six patients of the Levobupivacaine group (24%) and five patients of the Ropivacaine group (20%), IV fentanyl supplementation was required to complete surgery (P = 0.99). No differences in the time to recovery of sensory and motor function were observed between the two groups, whereas median (range) duration of postoperative analgesia was 16 h (8-24 h) with levobupivacaine and 16 h (8-24 h) with ropivacaine (P = 0.83). We conclude that 0.5% levobupivacaine and 0.5% ropivacaine provide comparable surgical anesthesia and postoperative analgesia.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)987-990
Number of pages4
JournalAnesthesia and Analgesia
Volume94
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 2002

Fingerprint

Nerve Block
Sciatic Nerve
Fentanyl
Analgesia
Mepivacaine
Femoral Nerve
Hallux Valgus
Anesthesia and Analgesia
ropivacaine
levobupivacaine
Ankle
Anesthesia

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

Casati, A., Borghi, B., Fanelli, G., Cerchierini, E., Santorsola, R., Sassoli, V., ... Torri, G. (2002). A double-blinded, randomized comparison of either 0.5% levobupivacaine or 0.5% ropivacaine for sciatic nerve block. Anesthesia and Analgesia, 94(4), 987-990.

A double-blinded, randomized comparison of either 0.5% levobupivacaine or 0.5% ropivacaine for sciatic nerve block. / Casati, Andrea; Borghi, Battista; Fanelli, Guido; Cerchierini, Elisa; Santorsola, Roberta; Sassoli, Valeria; Grispigni, Crispino; Torri, Giorgio.

In: Anesthesia and Analgesia, Vol. 94, No. 4, 2002, p. 987-990.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Casati, A, Borghi, B, Fanelli, G, Cerchierini, E, Santorsola, R, Sassoli, V, Grispigni, C & Torri, G 2002, 'A double-blinded, randomized comparison of either 0.5% levobupivacaine or 0.5% ropivacaine for sciatic nerve block', Anesthesia and Analgesia, vol. 94, no. 4, pp. 987-990.
Casati, Andrea ; Borghi, Battista ; Fanelli, Guido ; Cerchierini, Elisa ; Santorsola, Roberta ; Sassoli, Valeria ; Grispigni, Crispino ; Torri, Giorgio. / A double-blinded, randomized comparison of either 0.5% levobupivacaine or 0.5% ropivacaine for sciatic nerve block. In: Anesthesia and Analgesia. 2002 ; Vol. 94, No. 4. pp. 987-990.
@article{01c8f8e5d8ab455c93531e6a4c5cac98,
title = "A double-blinded, randomized comparison of either 0.5{\%} levobupivacaine or 0.5{\%} ropivacaine for sciatic nerve block",
abstract = "To compare intraoperative and postoperative clinical properties of levobupivacaine and ropivacaine for sciatic nerve block, 50 ASA physical status I and II patients undergoing hallux valgus repair received a femoral nerve block with 15 mL of 2{\%} mepivacaine. They were then randomly allocated in a double-blinded fashion to receive a sciatic nerve block with either 0.5{\%} levobupivacaine (n = 25) or 0.5{\%} ropivacaine (n = 25). An independent blinded observer evaluated the onset time of surgical anesthesia as well as the quality of the surgical block and postoperative analgesia. The median (range) onset time of surgical block at the sciatic nerve distribution was 30 min (5-60 min) with levobupivacaine and 15 min (5-60 min) with ropivacaine (P = 0.63). Four patients (two patients in each group) received a supplementary ankle block by the surgeon just before the beginning of surgery. All four patients also received IV fentanyl supplementation, but in three of them, propofolinfusion was required to complete surgery (two in the Levobupivacaine group [8{\%}] and one in the Ropivacaine group [4{\%}]; P = 0.99). In six patients of the Levobupivacaine group (24{\%}) and five patients of the Ropivacaine group (20{\%}), IV fentanyl supplementation was required to complete surgery (P = 0.99). No differences in the time to recovery of sensory and motor function were observed between the two groups, whereas median (range) duration of postoperative analgesia was 16 h (8-24 h) with levobupivacaine and 16 h (8-24 h) with ropivacaine (P = 0.83). We conclude that 0.5{\%} levobupivacaine and 0.5{\%} ropivacaine provide comparable surgical anesthesia and postoperative analgesia.",
author = "Andrea Casati and Battista Borghi and Guido Fanelli and Elisa Cerchierini and Roberta Santorsola and Valeria Sassoli and Crispino Grispigni and Giorgio Torri",
year = "2002",
language = "English",
volume = "94",
pages = "987--990",
journal = "Anesthesia and Analgesia",
issn = "0003-2999",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A double-blinded, randomized comparison of either 0.5% levobupivacaine or 0.5% ropivacaine for sciatic nerve block

AU - Casati, Andrea

AU - Borghi, Battista

AU - Fanelli, Guido

AU - Cerchierini, Elisa

AU - Santorsola, Roberta

AU - Sassoli, Valeria

AU - Grispigni, Crispino

AU - Torri, Giorgio

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - To compare intraoperative and postoperative clinical properties of levobupivacaine and ropivacaine for sciatic nerve block, 50 ASA physical status I and II patients undergoing hallux valgus repair received a femoral nerve block with 15 mL of 2% mepivacaine. They were then randomly allocated in a double-blinded fashion to receive a sciatic nerve block with either 0.5% levobupivacaine (n = 25) or 0.5% ropivacaine (n = 25). An independent blinded observer evaluated the onset time of surgical anesthesia as well as the quality of the surgical block and postoperative analgesia. The median (range) onset time of surgical block at the sciatic nerve distribution was 30 min (5-60 min) with levobupivacaine and 15 min (5-60 min) with ropivacaine (P = 0.63). Four patients (two patients in each group) received a supplementary ankle block by the surgeon just before the beginning of surgery. All four patients also received IV fentanyl supplementation, but in three of them, propofolinfusion was required to complete surgery (two in the Levobupivacaine group [8%] and one in the Ropivacaine group [4%]; P = 0.99). In six patients of the Levobupivacaine group (24%) and five patients of the Ropivacaine group (20%), IV fentanyl supplementation was required to complete surgery (P = 0.99). No differences in the time to recovery of sensory and motor function were observed between the two groups, whereas median (range) duration of postoperative analgesia was 16 h (8-24 h) with levobupivacaine and 16 h (8-24 h) with ropivacaine (P = 0.83). We conclude that 0.5% levobupivacaine and 0.5% ropivacaine provide comparable surgical anesthesia and postoperative analgesia.

AB - To compare intraoperative and postoperative clinical properties of levobupivacaine and ropivacaine for sciatic nerve block, 50 ASA physical status I and II patients undergoing hallux valgus repair received a femoral nerve block with 15 mL of 2% mepivacaine. They were then randomly allocated in a double-blinded fashion to receive a sciatic nerve block with either 0.5% levobupivacaine (n = 25) or 0.5% ropivacaine (n = 25). An independent blinded observer evaluated the onset time of surgical anesthesia as well as the quality of the surgical block and postoperative analgesia. The median (range) onset time of surgical block at the sciatic nerve distribution was 30 min (5-60 min) with levobupivacaine and 15 min (5-60 min) with ropivacaine (P = 0.63). Four patients (two patients in each group) received a supplementary ankle block by the surgeon just before the beginning of surgery. All four patients also received IV fentanyl supplementation, but in three of them, propofolinfusion was required to complete surgery (two in the Levobupivacaine group [8%] and one in the Ropivacaine group [4%]; P = 0.99). In six patients of the Levobupivacaine group (24%) and five patients of the Ropivacaine group (20%), IV fentanyl supplementation was required to complete surgery (P = 0.99). No differences in the time to recovery of sensory and motor function were observed between the two groups, whereas median (range) duration of postoperative analgesia was 16 h (8-24 h) with levobupivacaine and 16 h (8-24 h) with ropivacaine (P = 0.83). We conclude that 0.5% levobupivacaine and 0.5% ropivacaine provide comparable surgical anesthesia and postoperative analgesia.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036206247&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036206247&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 11916809

AN - SCOPUS:0036206247

VL - 94

SP - 987

EP - 990

JO - Anesthesia and Analgesia

JF - Anesthesia and Analgesia

SN - 0003-2999

IS - 4

ER -