A geometric index to differentiate abnormal from normal septal wall motion on cardiac MRI

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Background The definition of abnormal septal wall motion (SWM) is usually performed on a subjective visual assessment with cardiac MR (CMR). Purpose To quantify SWM using a geometric index and to compare this index to the visual inspection in patients with or without abnormal SWM. Material and Methods Cine CMR images of 100 consecutive patients were retrospectively assessed for visual evaluation of SWM and calculation of a convexity septal index (CSI) on mid-ventricular short-axis images, defined as b/a (a = minimal distance from anterior to posterior ventricular junctions; b = maximal distance from septum to a), obtained in end-systole (ES) and end-diastole (ED). Cohen κ, Bland-Altman method, Kruskall-Wallis, Mann-Whitney U, Jonckheere-Terpstra, and Spearman statistics were used to compare the two methods. Results At visual evaluation, 73 patients had normal SWM (group A), nine abnormal SWM at ES (group B), and 18 at ES and ED (group C). Median CSI for group A was significantly higher (ES = 0.23, ED = 0.25) than those for group B and C (0.10-0.15) (P <0.001). Inter-reader reproducibility of visual evaluation was high (κ = 0.841, P <0.001) while that for CSI was 77%. Average time for visual analysis was 3 min, for quantitative analysis 4 min. Conclusion CSI is a simple and reproducible way to quantify SWM. ED CSI seems to be sensitive in detecting abnormal SWM in patients with apparently normal SWM at visual evaluation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)545-551
Number of pages7
JournalActa Radiologica
Volume56
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 1 2015

Fingerprint

Diastole
Systole

Keywords

  • Cardiac MR (CMR)
  • convexity septal index (CSI)
  • septal wall motion (SWM)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

A geometric index to differentiate abnormal from normal septal wall motion on cardiac MRI. / Secchi, Francesco; Resta, Elda Chiara; Giardino, Antonello; Di Leo, Giovanni; Bandera, Francesco; Guazzi, Marco; Sardanelli, Francesco.

In: Acta Radiologica, Vol. 56, No. 5, 01.05.2015, p. 545-551.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{07f5aad7600a42d5af42abaae7c9b6df,
title = "A geometric index to differentiate abnormal from normal septal wall motion on cardiac MRI",
abstract = "Background The definition of abnormal septal wall motion (SWM) is usually performed on a subjective visual assessment with cardiac MR (CMR). Purpose To quantify SWM using a geometric index and to compare this index to the visual inspection in patients with or without abnormal SWM. Material and Methods Cine CMR images of 100 consecutive patients were retrospectively assessed for visual evaluation of SWM and calculation of a convexity septal index (CSI) on mid-ventricular short-axis images, defined as b/a (a = minimal distance from anterior to posterior ventricular junctions; b = maximal distance from septum to a), obtained in end-systole (ES) and end-diastole (ED). Cohen κ, Bland-Altman method, Kruskall-Wallis, Mann-Whitney U, Jonckheere-Terpstra, and Spearman statistics were used to compare the two methods. Results At visual evaluation, 73 patients had normal SWM (group A), nine abnormal SWM at ES (group B), and 18 at ES and ED (group C). Median CSI for group A was significantly higher (ES = 0.23, ED = 0.25) than those for group B and C (0.10-0.15) (P <0.001). Inter-reader reproducibility of visual evaluation was high (κ = 0.841, P <0.001) while that for CSI was 77{\%}. Average time for visual analysis was 3 min, for quantitative analysis 4 min. Conclusion CSI is a simple and reproducible way to quantify SWM. ED CSI seems to be sensitive in detecting abnormal SWM in patients with apparently normal SWM at visual evaluation.",
keywords = "Cardiac MR (CMR), convexity septal index (CSI), septal wall motion (SWM)",
author = "Francesco Secchi and Resta, {Elda Chiara} and Antonello Giardino and {Di Leo}, Giovanni and Francesco Bandera and Marco Guazzi and Francesco Sardanelli",
year = "2015",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0284185114533245",
language = "English",
volume = "56",
pages = "545--551",
journal = "Acta Radiologica",
issn = "0284-1851",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A geometric index to differentiate abnormal from normal septal wall motion on cardiac MRI

AU - Secchi, Francesco

AU - Resta, Elda Chiara

AU - Giardino, Antonello

AU - Di Leo, Giovanni

AU - Bandera, Francesco

AU - Guazzi, Marco

AU - Sardanelli, Francesco

PY - 2015/5/1

Y1 - 2015/5/1

N2 - Background The definition of abnormal septal wall motion (SWM) is usually performed on a subjective visual assessment with cardiac MR (CMR). Purpose To quantify SWM using a geometric index and to compare this index to the visual inspection in patients with or without abnormal SWM. Material and Methods Cine CMR images of 100 consecutive patients were retrospectively assessed for visual evaluation of SWM and calculation of a convexity septal index (CSI) on mid-ventricular short-axis images, defined as b/a (a = minimal distance from anterior to posterior ventricular junctions; b = maximal distance from septum to a), obtained in end-systole (ES) and end-diastole (ED). Cohen κ, Bland-Altman method, Kruskall-Wallis, Mann-Whitney U, Jonckheere-Terpstra, and Spearman statistics were used to compare the two methods. Results At visual evaluation, 73 patients had normal SWM (group A), nine abnormal SWM at ES (group B), and 18 at ES and ED (group C). Median CSI for group A was significantly higher (ES = 0.23, ED = 0.25) than those for group B and C (0.10-0.15) (P <0.001). Inter-reader reproducibility of visual evaluation was high (κ = 0.841, P <0.001) while that for CSI was 77%. Average time for visual analysis was 3 min, for quantitative analysis 4 min. Conclusion CSI is a simple and reproducible way to quantify SWM. ED CSI seems to be sensitive in detecting abnormal SWM in patients with apparently normal SWM at visual evaluation.

AB - Background The definition of abnormal septal wall motion (SWM) is usually performed on a subjective visual assessment with cardiac MR (CMR). Purpose To quantify SWM using a geometric index and to compare this index to the visual inspection in patients with or without abnormal SWM. Material and Methods Cine CMR images of 100 consecutive patients were retrospectively assessed for visual evaluation of SWM and calculation of a convexity septal index (CSI) on mid-ventricular short-axis images, defined as b/a (a = minimal distance from anterior to posterior ventricular junctions; b = maximal distance from septum to a), obtained in end-systole (ES) and end-diastole (ED). Cohen κ, Bland-Altman method, Kruskall-Wallis, Mann-Whitney U, Jonckheere-Terpstra, and Spearman statistics were used to compare the two methods. Results At visual evaluation, 73 patients had normal SWM (group A), nine abnormal SWM at ES (group B), and 18 at ES and ED (group C). Median CSI for group A was significantly higher (ES = 0.23, ED = 0.25) than those for group B and C (0.10-0.15) (P <0.001). Inter-reader reproducibility of visual evaluation was high (κ = 0.841, P <0.001) while that for CSI was 77%. Average time for visual analysis was 3 min, for quantitative analysis 4 min. Conclusion CSI is a simple and reproducible way to quantify SWM. ED CSI seems to be sensitive in detecting abnormal SWM in patients with apparently normal SWM at visual evaluation.

KW - Cardiac MR (CMR)

KW - convexity septal index (CSI)

KW - septal wall motion (SWM)

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84930903923&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84930903923&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0284185114533245

DO - 10.1177/0284185114533245

M3 - Article

C2 - 24847135

AN - SCOPUS:84930903923

VL - 56

SP - 545

EP - 551

JO - Acta Radiologica

JF - Acta Radiologica

SN - 0284-1851

IS - 5

ER -