A head-to-head comparison of the personality inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5) with the personality diagnostic questionnaire-4 (PDQ-4) in predicting the general level of personality pathology among community dwelling subjects

Andrea Fossati, Antonella Somma, Serena Borroni, Cesare Maffei, Kristian E. Markon, Robert F. Krueger

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In order to evaluate if measures of DSM-5 Alternative PD Model domainspredicted interview-based scores of general personality pathology whencompared to self-report measures of DSM-IV Axis II/DSM-5 Section II PDcriteria, 300 Italian community adults were administered the Iowa PersonalityDisorder Screen (IPDS) interview, the Personality Inventory for DSM-5(PID-5), and the Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire-4+ (PDQ-4+). Multipleregression analyses showed that the five PID-5 domain scales collectivelyexplained an adequate rate of the variance of the IPDS interview total score.This result was slightly lower than the amount of variance in the IPDS totalscore explained by the 10 PDQ-4+ scales. The PID-5 traits scales performedbetter than the PDQ-4+, although the difference was marginal. Hierarchicalregression analyses revealed that the PID-5 domain and trait scales provideda moderate, but significant increase in the prediction of the general level ofpersonality pathology above and beyond the PDQ-4+ scales.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)82-94
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Personality Disorders
Volume30
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 1 2016

Fingerprint

Independent Living
Personality Inventory
Personality
Pathology
Interviews
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
Self Report
Surveys and Questionnaires

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Clinical Psychology

Cite this

A head-to-head comparison of the personality inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5) with the personality diagnostic questionnaire-4 (PDQ-4) in predicting the general level of personality pathology among community dwelling subjects. / Fossati, Andrea; Somma, Antonella; Borroni, Serena; Maffei, Cesare; Markon, Kristian E.; Krueger, Robert F.

In: Journal of Personality Disorders, Vol. 30, No. 1, 01.02.2016, p. 82-94.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{cc9da692e7574b05b59b1c1cd921e436,
title = "A head-to-head comparison of the personality inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5) with the personality diagnostic questionnaire-4 (PDQ-4) in predicting the general level of personality pathology among community dwelling subjects",
abstract = "In order to evaluate if measures of DSM-5 Alternative PD Model domainspredicted interview-based scores of general personality pathology whencompared to self-report measures of DSM-IV Axis II/DSM-5 Section II PDcriteria, 300 Italian community adults were administered the Iowa PersonalityDisorder Screen (IPDS) interview, the Personality Inventory for DSM-5(PID-5), and the Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire-4+ (PDQ-4+). Multipleregression analyses showed that the five PID-5 domain scales collectivelyexplained an adequate rate of the variance of the IPDS interview total score.This result was slightly lower than the amount of variance in the IPDS totalscore explained by the 10 PDQ-4+ scales. The PID-5 traits scales performedbetter than the PDQ-4+, although the difference was marginal. Hierarchicalregression analyses revealed that the PID-5 domain and trait scales provideda moderate, but significant increase in the prediction of the general level ofpersonality pathology above and beyond the PDQ-4+ scales.",
author = "Andrea Fossati and Antonella Somma and Serena Borroni and Cesare Maffei and Markon, {Kristian E.} and Krueger, {Robert F.}",
year = "2016",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1521/pedi_2015_29_184",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "82--94",
journal = "Journal of Personality Disorders",
issn = "0885-579X",
publisher = "Guilford Publications",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A head-to-head comparison of the personality inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5) with the personality diagnostic questionnaire-4 (PDQ-4) in predicting the general level of personality pathology among community dwelling subjects

AU - Fossati, Andrea

AU - Somma, Antonella

AU - Borroni, Serena

AU - Maffei, Cesare

AU - Markon, Kristian E.

AU - Krueger, Robert F.

PY - 2016/2/1

Y1 - 2016/2/1

N2 - In order to evaluate if measures of DSM-5 Alternative PD Model domainspredicted interview-based scores of general personality pathology whencompared to self-report measures of DSM-IV Axis II/DSM-5 Section II PDcriteria, 300 Italian community adults were administered the Iowa PersonalityDisorder Screen (IPDS) interview, the Personality Inventory for DSM-5(PID-5), and the Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire-4+ (PDQ-4+). Multipleregression analyses showed that the five PID-5 domain scales collectivelyexplained an adequate rate of the variance of the IPDS interview total score.This result was slightly lower than the amount of variance in the IPDS totalscore explained by the 10 PDQ-4+ scales. The PID-5 traits scales performedbetter than the PDQ-4+, although the difference was marginal. Hierarchicalregression analyses revealed that the PID-5 domain and trait scales provideda moderate, but significant increase in the prediction of the general level ofpersonality pathology above and beyond the PDQ-4+ scales.

AB - In order to evaluate if measures of DSM-5 Alternative PD Model domainspredicted interview-based scores of general personality pathology whencompared to self-report measures of DSM-IV Axis II/DSM-5 Section II PDcriteria, 300 Italian community adults were administered the Iowa PersonalityDisorder Screen (IPDS) interview, the Personality Inventory for DSM-5(PID-5), and the Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire-4+ (PDQ-4+). Multipleregression analyses showed that the five PID-5 domain scales collectivelyexplained an adequate rate of the variance of the IPDS interview total score.This result was slightly lower than the amount of variance in the IPDS totalscore explained by the 10 PDQ-4+ scales. The PID-5 traits scales performedbetter than the PDQ-4+, although the difference was marginal. Hierarchicalregression analyses revealed that the PID-5 domain and trait scales provideda moderate, but significant increase in the prediction of the general level ofpersonality pathology above and beyond the PDQ-4+ scales.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84956957773&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84956957773&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1521/pedi_2015_29_184

DO - 10.1521/pedi_2015_29_184

M3 - Article

C2 - 26828108

AN - SCOPUS:84956957773

VL - 30

SP - 82

EP - 94

JO - Journal of Personality Disorders

JF - Journal of Personality Disorders

SN - 0885-579X

IS - 1

ER -