TY - JOUR
T1 - A ‘machine learning’ technique for discriminating captive-reared from wild Atlantic bluefin tuna, Thunnus thynnus (Osteichthyes
T2 - Scombridae), based on differential fin spine bone resorption
AU - Campobasso, Francesco
AU - Fanizzi, Annarita
AU - Bello, Giambattista
AU - Santamaria, Nicoletta
AU - Corriero, Aldo
PY - 2017/10/1
Y1 - 2017/10/1
N2 - The Atlantic bluefin tuna (ABFT) fishery is regulated by the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT), which establishes the allowable annual yield and the minimum capture size, and allocates capture quotas to the Contracting Parties. Despite fishery monitoring, a considerable amount of captures escapes ICCAT control. In the Mediterranean Sea, the purse seine fishery supports ABFT farming, a capture-based aquaculture activity that involves catching fish from the wild and rearing them in sea cages for a few months. The first spine of the cranial dorsal fin undergoes a continuous bone remodeling process consisting in old bone (primary bone) resorption and new bone (secondary bone) apposition. A marked increase of spine bone resorption was shown in captive-reared ABFT with respect to wild specimens. In this paper, the Random Forest (RF), a Computer Aided Detection system, was applied to distinguish captive-reared from wild ABFT based on fish age, fish fork length, total surface of spine cross section, and surface of remodeled bone tissue in the spine cross section (sum of reabsorbed bone tissue and secondary cancellous bone). The RF system was also compared to the Logistic Regression method (LR). The percentages of properly classified animals, either wild or captive-reared, with respect to the overall number of animals, i.e. accuracy, was 95.3 ± 2.6% and 79.0 ± 5.1% for RF and LR, respectively. The percentages of the properly classified captive-reared specimens, i.e. sensitivity, were 93.5 ± 3.1% and 75.8 ± 5.3% for RF and LR, respectively. The percentages of the properly classified wild specimens was 96.7 ± 2.2% and 81.4 ± 4.9%, for RF and LR, respectively. The proposed technique appears to be a reliable investigation tool anytime the suspicion arises that illegally caught ABFT are sold as aquaculture products.
AB - The Atlantic bluefin tuna (ABFT) fishery is regulated by the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT), which establishes the allowable annual yield and the minimum capture size, and allocates capture quotas to the Contracting Parties. Despite fishery monitoring, a considerable amount of captures escapes ICCAT control. In the Mediterranean Sea, the purse seine fishery supports ABFT farming, a capture-based aquaculture activity that involves catching fish from the wild and rearing them in sea cages for a few months. The first spine of the cranial dorsal fin undergoes a continuous bone remodeling process consisting in old bone (primary bone) resorption and new bone (secondary bone) apposition. A marked increase of spine bone resorption was shown in captive-reared ABFT with respect to wild specimens. In this paper, the Random Forest (RF), a Computer Aided Detection system, was applied to distinguish captive-reared from wild ABFT based on fish age, fish fork length, total surface of spine cross section, and surface of remodeled bone tissue in the spine cross section (sum of reabsorbed bone tissue and secondary cancellous bone). The RF system was also compared to the Logistic Regression method (LR). The percentages of properly classified animals, either wild or captive-reared, with respect to the overall number of animals, i.e. accuracy, was 95.3 ± 2.6% and 79.0 ± 5.1% for RF and LR, respectively. The percentages of the properly classified captive-reared specimens, i.e. sensitivity, were 93.5 ± 3.1% and 75.8 ± 5.3% for RF and LR, respectively. The percentages of the properly classified wild specimens was 96.7 ± 2.2% and 81.4 ± 4.9%, for RF and LR, respectively. The proposed technique appears to be a reliable investigation tool anytime the suspicion arises that illegally caught ABFT are sold as aquaculture products.
KW - Atlantic bluefin tuna
KW - Random forest
KW - Spine bone resorption
KW - Supervised classification
KW - Tuna farming
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85019606127&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85019606127&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.fishres.2017.05.008
DO - 10.1016/j.fishres.2017.05.008
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85019606127
VL - 194
SP - 42
EP - 49
JO - Fisheries Research
JF - Fisheries Research
SN - 0165-7836
ER -