A methodological approach for determination of maximal inspiratory pressure in patients undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation

S. Spadaro, E. Marangoni, R. Ragazzi, F. Mojoli, M. Verri, L. Longo, L. Astolfi, C. A. Volta

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background. Maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) can help to evaluate inspiratory muscle strength. However its determination in ventilated patients is cumbersome and needs special equipment. We hypothesized that MIP could be obtained by using the expiratory hold knob of the ventilator. The aim of this study was to verify whether: 1) the end expiratory occlusion technique can be used for MIP determination; and 2) if this technique provides different results compared to those obtained by the traditional method of MIP calculation. Methods. We studied 23 consecutive patients undergoing mechanical ventilation for acute respiratory failure. The MIP was determined by two different methods, both based on occluding the airway for 20 seconds. This occlusion was obtained either by pressing the expiratory hold knob of the ventilator; or by detaching the patient from the ventilator circuit and using a noiseless pneumatic shutter placed on the inspiratory line of a two-way valve that allows expiration but prevents inspiration. Results. The average values of MIP obtained by using either the hold knob of the ventilator or the noiseless pneumatic shutter were -46±14 cmH2O and -56±13 cmH2O, respectively. The linear regression analysis showed a significant correlation between MIPVent and MIPOcc (r2=0.95), although the Bland- Altman analysis revealed that they are not clinically comparable. Conclusion. MIP can be easily determined at the bedside by pressing the expiratory hold knob of ventilator. However, MIPVent and MIPOcc are different in terms of absolute value probably because they were determined at diverse lung volume.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)33-38
Number of pages6
JournalMinerva Anestesiologica
Volume81
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - Jan 1 2015

Fingerprint

Artificial Respiration
Mechanical Ventilators
Muscle Strength
Maximal Respiratory Pressures
Respiratory Insufficiency
Linear Models
Regression Analysis
Equipment and Supplies
Lung

Keywords

  • Intensive care unit
  • Muscle strength
  • Respiration artificial

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

A methodological approach for determination of maximal inspiratory pressure in patients undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation. / Spadaro, S.; Marangoni, E.; Ragazzi, R.; Mojoli, F.; Verri, M.; Longo, L.; Astolfi, L.; Volta, C. A.

In: Minerva Anestesiologica, Vol. 81, No. 1, 01.01.2015, p. 33-38.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Spadaro, S, Marangoni, E, Ragazzi, R, Mojoli, F, Verri, M, Longo, L, Astolfi, L & Volta, CA 2015, 'A methodological approach for determination of maximal inspiratory pressure in patients undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation', Minerva Anestesiologica, vol. 81, no. 1, pp. 33-38.
Spadaro, S. ; Marangoni, E. ; Ragazzi, R. ; Mojoli, F. ; Verri, M. ; Longo, L. ; Astolfi, L. ; Volta, C. A. / A methodological approach for determination of maximal inspiratory pressure in patients undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation. In: Minerva Anestesiologica. 2015 ; Vol. 81, No. 1. pp. 33-38.
@article{6ef9e3e1e2754b1bb369ad814a335ee7,
title = "A methodological approach for determination of maximal inspiratory pressure in patients undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation",
abstract = "Background. Maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) can help to evaluate inspiratory muscle strength. However its determination in ventilated patients is cumbersome and needs special equipment. We hypothesized that MIP could be obtained by using the expiratory hold knob of the ventilator. The aim of this study was to verify whether: 1) the end expiratory occlusion technique can be used for MIP determination; and 2) if this technique provides different results compared to those obtained by the traditional method of MIP calculation. Methods. We studied 23 consecutive patients undergoing mechanical ventilation for acute respiratory failure. The MIP was determined by two different methods, both based on occluding the airway for 20 seconds. This occlusion was obtained either by pressing the expiratory hold knob of the ventilator; or by detaching the patient from the ventilator circuit and using a noiseless pneumatic shutter placed on the inspiratory line of a two-way valve that allows expiration but prevents inspiration. Results. The average values of MIP obtained by using either the hold knob of the ventilator or the noiseless pneumatic shutter were -46±14 cmH2O and -56±13 cmH2O, respectively. The linear regression analysis showed a significant correlation between MIPVent and MIPOcc (r2=0.95), although the Bland- Altman analysis revealed that they are not clinically comparable. Conclusion. MIP can be easily determined at the bedside by pressing the expiratory hold knob of ventilator. However, MIPVent and MIPOcc are different in terms of absolute value probably because they were determined at diverse lung volume.",
keywords = "Intensive care unit, Muscle strength, Respiration artificial",
author = "S. Spadaro and E. Marangoni and R. Ragazzi and F. Mojoli and M. Verri and L. Longo and L. Astolfi and Volta, {C. A.}",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "81",
pages = "33--38",
journal = "Minerva Anestesiologica",
issn = "0375-9393",
publisher = "Edizioni Minerva Medica S.p.A.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A methodological approach for determination of maximal inspiratory pressure in patients undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation

AU - Spadaro, S.

AU - Marangoni, E.

AU - Ragazzi, R.

AU - Mojoli, F.

AU - Verri, M.

AU - Longo, L.

AU - Astolfi, L.

AU - Volta, C. A.

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Background. Maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) can help to evaluate inspiratory muscle strength. However its determination in ventilated patients is cumbersome and needs special equipment. We hypothesized that MIP could be obtained by using the expiratory hold knob of the ventilator. The aim of this study was to verify whether: 1) the end expiratory occlusion technique can be used for MIP determination; and 2) if this technique provides different results compared to those obtained by the traditional method of MIP calculation. Methods. We studied 23 consecutive patients undergoing mechanical ventilation for acute respiratory failure. The MIP was determined by two different methods, both based on occluding the airway for 20 seconds. This occlusion was obtained either by pressing the expiratory hold knob of the ventilator; or by detaching the patient from the ventilator circuit and using a noiseless pneumatic shutter placed on the inspiratory line of a two-way valve that allows expiration but prevents inspiration. Results. The average values of MIP obtained by using either the hold knob of the ventilator or the noiseless pneumatic shutter were -46±14 cmH2O and -56±13 cmH2O, respectively. The linear regression analysis showed a significant correlation between MIPVent and MIPOcc (r2=0.95), although the Bland- Altman analysis revealed that they are not clinically comparable. Conclusion. MIP can be easily determined at the bedside by pressing the expiratory hold knob of ventilator. However, MIPVent and MIPOcc are different in terms of absolute value probably because they were determined at diverse lung volume.

AB - Background. Maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) can help to evaluate inspiratory muscle strength. However its determination in ventilated patients is cumbersome and needs special equipment. We hypothesized that MIP could be obtained by using the expiratory hold knob of the ventilator. The aim of this study was to verify whether: 1) the end expiratory occlusion technique can be used for MIP determination; and 2) if this technique provides different results compared to those obtained by the traditional method of MIP calculation. Methods. We studied 23 consecutive patients undergoing mechanical ventilation for acute respiratory failure. The MIP was determined by two different methods, both based on occluding the airway for 20 seconds. This occlusion was obtained either by pressing the expiratory hold knob of the ventilator; or by detaching the patient from the ventilator circuit and using a noiseless pneumatic shutter placed on the inspiratory line of a two-way valve that allows expiration but prevents inspiration. Results. The average values of MIP obtained by using either the hold knob of the ventilator or the noiseless pneumatic shutter were -46±14 cmH2O and -56±13 cmH2O, respectively. The linear regression analysis showed a significant correlation between MIPVent and MIPOcc (r2=0.95), although the Bland- Altman analysis revealed that they are not clinically comparable. Conclusion. MIP can be easily determined at the bedside by pressing the expiratory hold knob of ventilator. However, MIPVent and MIPOcc are different in terms of absolute value probably because they were determined at diverse lung volume.

KW - Intensive care unit

KW - Muscle strength

KW - Respiration artificial

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84925433470&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84925433470&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84925433470

VL - 81

SP - 33

EP - 38

JO - Minerva Anestesiologica

JF - Minerva Anestesiologica

SN - 0375-9393

IS - 1

ER -