A new “keyhole” approach for multilevel anterior lumbar interbody fusion: the perinavel approach—technical note and literature review

R. Bassani, A. M. Querenghi, R. Cecchinato, C. Morselli, G. Casero, D. Gavino, S. Brock, C. Ferlinghetti

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the feasibility and the safety of a new skin incision for minimally invasive anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF): the perinavel incision. Methods: Demographic and clinical data from patients who underwent ALIF with the perinavel incision were collected. Indications to surgery, preoperative symptoms, radiological data, number of treated levels, intraoperative and early postoperative complications and wound-related problems were analysed. Result: Ninety-seven patients underwent ALIF with this new skin incision. One hundred fifty-seven levels were treated (mean 1.7 level per patient) being L4–L5 the most frequently treated. Intraoperative complications were represented only by the venous injury with a rate of 3.09% (3 cases). Postoperative complications were all linked to skin incision issues: a case of wound dehiscence and a case of superficial infection. No case of skin necrosis occurs at 3-month follow-up. Conclusions: In this paper, the perinavel skin incision was demonstrated to be as safe as traditional approaches for ALIF. Furthermore, with this incision it is possible to perform multilevel (L3–S1) ALIF, which means a good option in minimally invasive surgery as well as revision surgery. Graphical abstract: These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.[Figure not available: see fulltext.].

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1956-1963
Number of pages8
JournalEuropean Spine Journal
Volume27
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 1 2018

Fingerprint

Skin
Wounds and Injuries
Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures
Intraoperative Complications
Reoperation
Necrosis
Demography
Safety
Infection

Keywords

  • ALIF
  • Lumbar fusion
  • Minimally invasive spine surgery
  • Perinavel approach
  • Retroperitoneal approach

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Bassani, R., Querenghi, A. M., Cecchinato, R., Morselli, C., Casero, G., Gavino, D., ... Ferlinghetti, C. (2018). A new “keyhole” approach for multilevel anterior lumbar interbody fusion: the perinavel approach—technical note and literature review. European Spine Journal, 27(8), 1956-1963. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-018-5659-0

A new “keyhole” approach for multilevel anterior lumbar interbody fusion : the perinavel approach—technical note and literature review. / Bassani, R.; Querenghi, A. M.; Cecchinato, R.; Morselli, C.; Casero, G.; Gavino, D.; Brock, S.; Ferlinghetti, C.

In: European Spine Journal, Vol. 27, No. 8, 01.08.2018, p. 1956-1963.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bassani, R, Querenghi, AM, Cecchinato, R, Morselli, C, Casero, G, Gavino, D, Brock, S & Ferlinghetti, C 2018, 'A new “keyhole” approach for multilevel anterior lumbar interbody fusion: the perinavel approach—technical note and literature review', European Spine Journal, vol. 27, no. 8, pp. 1956-1963. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-018-5659-0
Bassani, R. ; Querenghi, A. M. ; Cecchinato, R. ; Morselli, C. ; Casero, G. ; Gavino, D. ; Brock, S. ; Ferlinghetti, C. / A new “keyhole” approach for multilevel anterior lumbar interbody fusion : the perinavel approach—technical note and literature review. In: European Spine Journal. 2018 ; Vol. 27, No. 8. pp. 1956-1963.
@article{fad571e1dd96405ea5998c4a4d710ef7,
title = "A new “keyhole” approach for multilevel anterior lumbar interbody fusion: the perinavel approach—technical note and literature review",
abstract = "Purpose: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the feasibility and the safety of a new skin incision for minimally invasive anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF): the perinavel incision. Methods: Demographic and clinical data from patients who underwent ALIF with the perinavel incision were collected. Indications to surgery, preoperative symptoms, radiological data, number of treated levels, intraoperative and early postoperative complications and wound-related problems were analysed. Result: Ninety-seven patients underwent ALIF with this new skin incision. One hundred fifty-seven levels were treated (mean 1.7 level per patient) being L4–L5 the most frequently treated. Intraoperative complications were represented only by the venous injury with a rate of 3.09{\%} (3 cases). Postoperative complications were all linked to skin incision issues: a case of wound dehiscence and a case of superficial infection. No case of skin necrosis occurs at 3-month follow-up. Conclusions: In this paper, the perinavel skin incision was demonstrated to be as safe as traditional approaches for ALIF. Furthermore, with this incision it is possible to perform multilevel (L3–S1) ALIF, which means a good option in minimally invasive surgery as well as revision surgery. Graphical abstract: These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.[Figure not available: see fulltext.].",
keywords = "ALIF, Lumbar fusion, Minimally invasive spine surgery, Perinavel approach, Retroperitoneal approach",
author = "R. Bassani and Querenghi, {A. M.} and R. Cecchinato and C. Morselli and G. Casero and D. Gavino and S. Brock and C. Ferlinghetti",
year = "2018",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s00586-018-5659-0",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "1956--1963",
journal = "European Spine Journal",
issn = "0940-6719",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A new “keyhole” approach for multilevel anterior lumbar interbody fusion

T2 - the perinavel approach—technical note and literature review

AU - Bassani, R.

AU - Querenghi, A. M.

AU - Cecchinato, R.

AU - Morselli, C.

AU - Casero, G.

AU - Gavino, D.

AU - Brock, S.

AU - Ferlinghetti, C.

PY - 2018/8/1

Y1 - 2018/8/1

N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the feasibility and the safety of a new skin incision for minimally invasive anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF): the perinavel incision. Methods: Demographic and clinical data from patients who underwent ALIF with the perinavel incision were collected. Indications to surgery, preoperative symptoms, radiological data, number of treated levels, intraoperative and early postoperative complications and wound-related problems were analysed. Result: Ninety-seven patients underwent ALIF with this new skin incision. One hundred fifty-seven levels were treated (mean 1.7 level per patient) being L4–L5 the most frequently treated. Intraoperative complications were represented only by the venous injury with a rate of 3.09% (3 cases). Postoperative complications were all linked to skin incision issues: a case of wound dehiscence and a case of superficial infection. No case of skin necrosis occurs at 3-month follow-up. Conclusions: In this paper, the perinavel skin incision was demonstrated to be as safe as traditional approaches for ALIF. Furthermore, with this incision it is possible to perform multilevel (L3–S1) ALIF, which means a good option in minimally invasive surgery as well as revision surgery. Graphical abstract: These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.[Figure not available: see fulltext.].

AB - Purpose: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the feasibility and the safety of a new skin incision for minimally invasive anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF): the perinavel incision. Methods: Demographic and clinical data from patients who underwent ALIF with the perinavel incision were collected. Indications to surgery, preoperative symptoms, radiological data, number of treated levels, intraoperative and early postoperative complications and wound-related problems were analysed. Result: Ninety-seven patients underwent ALIF with this new skin incision. One hundred fifty-seven levels were treated (mean 1.7 level per patient) being L4–L5 the most frequently treated. Intraoperative complications were represented only by the venous injury with a rate of 3.09% (3 cases). Postoperative complications were all linked to skin incision issues: a case of wound dehiscence and a case of superficial infection. No case of skin necrosis occurs at 3-month follow-up. Conclusions: In this paper, the perinavel skin incision was demonstrated to be as safe as traditional approaches for ALIF. Furthermore, with this incision it is possible to perform multilevel (L3–S1) ALIF, which means a good option in minimally invasive surgery as well as revision surgery. Graphical abstract: These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.[Figure not available: see fulltext.].

KW - ALIF

KW - Lumbar fusion

KW - Minimally invasive spine surgery

KW - Perinavel approach

KW - Retroperitoneal approach

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048295256&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85048295256&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00586-018-5659-0

DO - 10.1007/s00586-018-5659-0

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85048295256

VL - 27

SP - 1956

EP - 1963

JO - European Spine Journal

JF - European Spine Journal

SN - 0940-6719

IS - 8

ER -