A novel tool to assess the risk of urinary incontinence after nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy

Firas Abdollah, Maxine Sun, Nazareno Suardi, Andrea Gallina, Manuela Tutolo, Niccolò Passoni, Marco Bianchi, Andrea Salonia, Renzo Colombo, Patrizio Rigatti, Pierre I. Karakiewicz, Francesco Montorsi, Alberto Briganti

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? • Urinary incontinence is one of the most important morbidities after radical prostatectomy that has detrimental effect on the postoperative quality of life. • The present study provides an accurate and dynamic multivariable risk stratification tool that predicts the postoperative urinary incontinence risk after radical prostatectomy based on patient-related as well as surgeon-related variables. Objective: • To develop a multivariable risk classification tool to estimate postoperative urinary incontinence (UI) risk as UI represents one of the most disabling surgical sequelae after radical prostatectomy (RP). Patients and Methods: • We evaluated 1311 patients treated with nerve-sparing RP between 2006 and 2010 at our institution. • Regression tree analysis was used to stratify patients according to their postoperative UI risk. Kaplan-Meier curve estimates were used to assess the UI rate in the novel UI-risk groups. The discrimination of the novel tool was measured with the area under the curve method. Results: • At 3, 6 and 12 months, the UI rates were 44%, 26% and 12%, respectively. Regression tree analysis stratified patients into high risk (International Index of Erectile Function - Erectile Function domain [IIEF-EF] = 1-10), intermediate risk (IIEF-EF > 10 and age ≥ 65 years), low risk (IIEF-EF > 10, age <65 years and body mass index [BMI] ≥ 25 kg/m2) and very low risk (IIEF-EF > 10, age <65 years and BMI <25 kg/m2) groups. • The 3-month UI rates in these groups were 37%, 43%, 45% and 48%, respectively. The 6-month UI rates were 19%, 23%, 29% and 34%, respectively. The 12-month UI rates were 7%, 13%, 14% and 15%, respectively (log-rank P <0.001). • The area under the curve was 71%, 70% and 68% at 3, 6 and 12 months, respectively. Conclusions: • We developed the first risk classification tool that predicts patients at high risk of UI after RP. These consisted mainly of individuals who were impotent before RP, elderly and/or overweight. • This tool can be used for patient counselling.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)905-913
Number of pages9
JournalBJU International
Volume111
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2013

Fingerprint

Urinary Incontinence
Prostatectomy
Area Under Curve
Regression Analysis
Kaplan-Meier Estimate
Counseling
Quality of Life
Morbidity

Keywords

  • prostatectomy/adverse effects
  • risk assessment
  • survival analysis
  • treatment outcome
  • urinary incontinence/aetiology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

A novel tool to assess the risk of urinary incontinence after nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy. / Abdollah, Firas; Sun, Maxine; Suardi, Nazareno; Gallina, Andrea; Tutolo, Manuela; Passoni, Niccolò; Bianchi, Marco; Salonia, Andrea; Colombo, Renzo; Rigatti, Patrizio; Karakiewicz, Pierre I.; Montorsi, Francesco; Briganti, Alberto.

In: BJU International, Vol. 111, No. 6, 05.2013, p. 905-913.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abdollah, Firas ; Sun, Maxine ; Suardi, Nazareno ; Gallina, Andrea ; Tutolo, Manuela ; Passoni, Niccolò ; Bianchi, Marco ; Salonia, Andrea ; Colombo, Renzo ; Rigatti, Patrizio ; Karakiewicz, Pierre I. ; Montorsi, Francesco ; Briganti, Alberto. / A novel tool to assess the risk of urinary incontinence after nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy. In: BJU International. 2013 ; Vol. 111, No. 6. pp. 905-913.
@article{bfa68fbf17104af3872704ff57b06190,
title = "A novel tool to assess the risk of urinary incontinence after nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy",
abstract = "What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? • Urinary incontinence is one of the most important morbidities after radical prostatectomy that has detrimental effect on the postoperative quality of life. • The present study provides an accurate and dynamic multivariable risk stratification tool that predicts the postoperative urinary incontinence risk after radical prostatectomy based on patient-related as well as surgeon-related variables. Objective: • To develop a multivariable risk classification tool to estimate postoperative urinary incontinence (UI) risk as UI represents one of the most disabling surgical sequelae after radical prostatectomy (RP). Patients and Methods: • We evaluated 1311 patients treated with nerve-sparing RP between 2006 and 2010 at our institution. • Regression tree analysis was used to stratify patients according to their postoperative UI risk. Kaplan-Meier curve estimates were used to assess the UI rate in the novel UI-risk groups. The discrimination of the novel tool was measured with the area under the curve method. Results: • At 3, 6 and 12 months, the UI rates were 44{\%}, 26{\%} and 12{\%}, respectively. Regression tree analysis stratified patients into high risk (International Index of Erectile Function - Erectile Function domain [IIEF-EF] = 1-10), intermediate risk (IIEF-EF > 10 and age ≥ 65 years), low risk (IIEF-EF > 10, age <65 years and body mass index [BMI] ≥ 25 kg/m2) and very low risk (IIEF-EF > 10, age <65 years and BMI <25 kg/m2) groups. • The 3-month UI rates in these groups were 37{\%}, 43{\%}, 45{\%} and 48{\%}, respectively. The 6-month UI rates were 19{\%}, 23{\%}, 29{\%} and 34{\%}, respectively. The 12-month UI rates were 7{\%}, 13{\%}, 14{\%} and 15{\%}, respectively (log-rank P <0.001). • The area under the curve was 71{\%}, 70{\%} and 68{\%} at 3, 6 and 12 months, respectively. Conclusions: • We developed the first risk classification tool that predicts patients at high risk of UI after RP. These consisted mainly of individuals who were impotent before RP, elderly and/or overweight. • This tool can be used for patient counselling.",
keywords = "prostatectomy/adverse effects, risk assessment, survival analysis, treatment outcome, urinary incontinence/aetiology",
author = "Firas Abdollah and Maxine Sun and Nazareno Suardi and Andrea Gallina and Manuela Tutolo and Niccol{\`o} Passoni and Marco Bianchi and Andrea Salonia and Renzo Colombo and Patrizio Rigatti and Karakiewicz, {Pierre I.} and Francesco Montorsi and Alberto Briganti",
year = "2013",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11560.x",
language = "English",
volume = "111",
pages = "905--913",
journal = "BJU International",
issn = "1464-4096",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A novel tool to assess the risk of urinary incontinence after nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy

AU - Abdollah, Firas

AU - Sun, Maxine

AU - Suardi, Nazareno

AU - Gallina, Andrea

AU - Tutolo, Manuela

AU - Passoni, Niccolò

AU - Bianchi, Marco

AU - Salonia, Andrea

AU - Colombo, Renzo

AU - Rigatti, Patrizio

AU - Karakiewicz, Pierre I.

AU - Montorsi, Francesco

AU - Briganti, Alberto

PY - 2013/5

Y1 - 2013/5

N2 - What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? • Urinary incontinence is one of the most important morbidities after radical prostatectomy that has detrimental effect on the postoperative quality of life. • The present study provides an accurate and dynamic multivariable risk stratification tool that predicts the postoperative urinary incontinence risk after radical prostatectomy based on patient-related as well as surgeon-related variables. Objective: • To develop a multivariable risk classification tool to estimate postoperative urinary incontinence (UI) risk as UI represents one of the most disabling surgical sequelae after radical prostatectomy (RP). Patients and Methods: • We evaluated 1311 patients treated with nerve-sparing RP between 2006 and 2010 at our institution. • Regression tree analysis was used to stratify patients according to their postoperative UI risk. Kaplan-Meier curve estimates were used to assess the UI rate in the novel UI-risk groups. The discrimination of the novel tool was measured with the area under the curve method. Results: • At 3, 6 and 12 months, the UI rates were 44%, 26% and 12%, respectively. Regression tree analysis stratified patients into high risk (International Index of Erectile Function - Erectile Function domain [IIEF-EF] = 1-10), intermediate risk (IIEF-EF > 10 and age ≥ 65 years), low risk (IIEF-EF > 10, age <65 years and body mass index [BMI] ≥ 25 kg/m2) and very low risk (IIEF-EF > 10, age <65 years and BMI <25 kg/m2) groups. • The 3-month UI rates in these groups were 37%, 43%, 45% and 48%, respectively. The 6-month UI rates were 19%, 23%, 29% and 34%, respectively. The 12-month UI rates were 7%, 13%, 14% and 15%, respectively (log-rank P <0.001). • The area under the curve was 71%, 70% and 68% at 3, 6 and 12 months, respectively. Conclusions: • We developed the first risk classification tool that predicts patients at high risk of UI after RP. These consisted mainly of individuals who were impotent before RP, elderly and/or overweight. • This tool can be used for patient counselling.

AB - What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? • Urinary incontinence is one of the most important morbidities after radical prostatectomy that has detrimental effect on the postoperative quality of life. • The present study provides an accurate and dynamic multivariable risk stratification tool that predicts the postoperative urinary incontinence risk after radical prostatectomy based on patient-related as well as surgeon-related variables. Objective: • To develop a multivariable risk classification tool to estimate postoperative urinary incontinence (UI) risk as UI represents one of the most disabling surgical sequelae after radical prostatectomy (RP). Patients and Methods: • We evaluated 1311 patients treated with nerve-sparing RP between 2006 and 2010 at our institution. • Regression tree analysis was used to stratify patients according to their postoperative UI risk. Kaplan-Meier curve estimates were used to assess the UI rate in the novel UI-risk groups. The discrimination of the novel tool was measured with the area under the curve method. Results: • At 3, 6 and 12 months, the UI rates were 44%, 26% and 12%, respectively. Regression tree analysis stratified patients into high risk (International Index of Erectile Function - Erectile Function domain [IIEF-EF] = 1-10), intermediate risk (IIEF-EF > 10 and age ≥ 65 years), low risk (IIEF-EF > 10, age <65 years and body mass index [BMI] ≥ 25 kg/m2) and very low risk (IIEF-EF > 10, age <65 years and BMI <25 kg/m2) groups. • The 3-month UI rates in these groups were 37%, 43%, 45% and 48%, respectively. The 6-month UI rates were 19%, 23%, 29% and 34%, respectively. The 12-month UI rates were 7%, 13%, 14% and 15%, respectively (log-rank P <0.001). • The area under the curve was 71%, 70% and 68% at 3, 6 and 12 months, respectively. Conclusions: • We developed the first risk classification tool that predicts patients at high risk of UI after RP. These consisted mainly of individuals who were impotent before RP, elderly and/or overweight. • This tool can be used for patient counselling.

KW - prostatectomy/adverse effects

KW - risk assessment

KW - survival analysis

KW - treatment outcome

KW - urinary incontinence/aetiology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84876894429&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84876894429&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11560.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11560.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 23331334

AN - SCOPUS:84876894429

VL - 111

SP - 905

EP - 913

JO - BJU International

JF - BJU International

SN - 1464-4096

IS - 6

ER -