A Proposal for Reclassification of the Fuhrman Grading System in Patients with Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma

Maxine Sun, Giovanni Lughezzani, Claudio Jeldres, Hendrik Isbarn, Shahrokh F. Shariat, Philippe Arjane, Hugues Widmer, Daniel Pharand, Mathieu Latour, Paul Perrotte, Jean Jacques Patard, Pierre I. Karakiewicz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

40 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The conventional Fuhrman grading system, which categorizes renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with grades I, II, III, and IV, is the most widely used predictor assessment of RCC cancer-specific mortality (CSM). Objectives: The aim of this study was to test the prognostic ability of simplified Fuhrman grading schemes (FGSs) that rely on two- or three-tiered classifications. Design, setting, and participants: The current study addressed a population of 14 064 patients with clear cell RCC who were treated with partial or radical nephrectomy between 1988-2004, within nine Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) cancer registries. Measurements: Univariable and multivariable analyses as well as prognostic accuracy analyses were performed for various FGSs to test their ability to predict CSM rates. The conventional four-tiered FGS was compared to a modified two-tiered FGS in which grades I and II and grades III and IV were combined. A second simplified three-tiered FGS in which grades I and II were combined but grades III and IV were kept separate was also tested. Results and limitations: The overall 5-yr CSM-free rate was 81.5%. All three FGSs achieved independent predictor status in multivariable analyses. Prognostic accuracy of multivariable models that relied on various FGSs was 83.6% for the modified two-tiered FGS and 83.8% for both the conventional four-tiered and the modified three-tiered FGS. Conclusions: Our findings indicate that the simplified FGSs perform equally as well as the conventional four-tiered FGS. The use of simplified grading schemes may represent an advantage for pathologists as well as for clinicians caring for patients with RCC. Crown

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)775-781
Number of pages7
JournalEuropean Urology
Volume56
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2009

Fingerprint

Renal Cell Carcinoma
Aptitude
Mortality
Neoplasms
Nephrectomy
Crowns
Registries
Epidemiology
Population

Keywords

  • Classification
  • Clear cell renal cell carcinoma
  • Fuhrman grade
  • Mortality
  • Prognosis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

A Proposal for Reclassification of the Fuhrman Grading System in Patients with Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma. / Sun, Maxine; Lughezzani, Giovanni; Jeldres, Claudio; Isbarn, Hendrik; Shariat, Shahrokh F.; Arjane, Philippe; Widmer, Hugues; Pharand, Daniel; Latour, Mathieu; Perrotte, Paul; Patard, Jean Jacques; Karakiewicz, Pierre I.

In: European Urology, Vol. 56, No. 5, 11.2009, p. 775-781.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sun, M, Lughezzani, G, Jeldres, C, Isbarn, H, Shariat, SF, Arjane, P, Widmer, H, Pharand, D, Latour, M, Perrotte, P, Patard, JJ & Karakiewicz, PI 2009, 'A Proposal for Reclassification of the Fuhrman Grading System in Patients with Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma', European Urology, vol. 56, no. 5, pp. 775-781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2009.06.008
Sun, Maxine ; Lughezzani, Giovanni ; Jeldres, Claudio ; Isbarn, Hendrik ; Shariat, Shahrokh F. ; Arjane, Philippe ; Widmer, Hugues ; Pharand, Daniel ; Latour, Mathieu ; Perrotte, Paul ; Patard, Jean Jacques ; Karakiewicz, Pierre I. / A Proposal for Reclassification of the Fuhrman Grading System in Patients with Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma. In: European Urology. 2009 ; Vol. 56, No. 5. pp. 775-781.
@article{151044d32bb3407cb3efadab81266e5e,
title = "A Proposal for Reclassification of the Fuhrman Grading System in Patients with Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma",
abstract = "Background: The conventional Fuhrman grading system, which categorizes renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with grades I, II, III, and IV, is the most widely used predictor assessment of RCC cancer-specific mortality (CSM). Objectives: The aim of this study was to test the prognostic ability of simplified Fuhrman grading schemes (FGSs) that rely on two- or three-tiered classifications. Design, setting, and participants: The current study addressed a population of 14 064 patients with clear cell RCC who were treated with partial or radical nephrectomy between 1988-2004, within nine Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) cancer registries. Measurements: Univariable and multivariable analyses as well as prognostic accuracy analyses were performed for various FGSs to test their ability to predict CSM rates. The conventional four-tiered FGS was compared to a modified two-tiered FGS in which grades I and II and grades III and IV were combined. A second simplified three-tiered FGS in which grades I and II were combined but grades III and IV were kept separate was also tested. Results and limitations: The overall 5-yr CSM-free rate was 81.5{\%}. All three FGSs achieved independent predictor status in multivariable analyses. Prognostic accuracy of multivariable models that relied on various FGSs was 83.6{\%} for the modified two-tiered FGS and 83.8{\%} for both the conventional four-tiered and the modified three-tiered FGS. Conclusions: Our findings indicate that the simplified FGSs perform equally as well as the conventional four-tiered FGS. The use of simplified grading schemes may represent an advantage for pathologists as well as for clinicians caring for patients with RCC. Crown",
keywords = "Classification, Clear cell renal cell carcinoma, Fuhrman grade, Mortality, Prognosis",
author = "Maxine Sun and Giovanni Lughezzani and Claudio Jeldres and Hendrik Isbarn and Shariat, {Shahrokh F.} and Philippe Arjane and Hugues Widmer and Daniel Pharand and Mathieu Latour and Paul Perrotte and Patard, {Jean Jacques} and Karakiewicz, {Pierre I.}",
year = "2009",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1016/j.eururo.2009.06.008",
language = "English",
volume = "56",
pages = "775--781",
journal = "European Urology",
issn = "0302-2838",
publisher = "Elsevier B.V.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Proposal for Reclassification of the Fuhrman Grading System in Patients with Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma

AU - Sun, Maxine

AU - Lughezzani, Giovanni

AU - Jeldres, Claudio

AU - Isbarn, Hendrik

AU - Shariat, Shahrokh F.

AU - Arjane, Philippe

AU - Widmer, Hugues

AU - Pharand, Daniel

AU - Latour, Mathieu

AU - Perrotte, Paul

AU - Patard, Jean Jacques

AU - Karakiewicz, Pierre I.

PY - 2009/11

Y1 - 2009/11

N2 - Background: The conventional Fuhrman grading system, which categorizes renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with grades I, II, III, and IV, is the most widely used predictor assessment of RCC cancer-specific mortality (CSM). Objectives: The aim of this study was to test the prognostic ability of simplified Fuhrman grading schemes (FGSs) that rely on two- or three-tiered classifications. Design, setting, and participants: The current study addressed a population of 14 064 patients with clear cell RCC who were treated with partial or radical nephrectomy between 1988-2004, within nine Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) cancer registries. Measurements: Univariable and multivariable analyses as well as prognostic accuracy analyses were performed for various FGSs to test their ability to predict CSM rates. The conventional four-tiered FGS was compared to a modified two-tiered FGS in which grades I and II and grades III and IV were combined. A second simplified three-tiered FGS in which grades I and II were combined but grades III and IV were kept separate was also tested. Results and limitations: The overall 5-yr CSM-free rate was 81.5%. All three FGSs achieved independent predictor status in multivariable analyses. Prognostic accuracy of multivariable models that relied on various FGSs was 83.6% for the modified two-tiered FGS and 83.8% for both the conventional four-tiered and the modified three-tiered FGS. Conclusions: Our findings indicate that the simplified FGSs perform equally as well as the conventional four-tiered FGS. The use of simplified grading schemes may represent an advantage for pathologists as well as for clinicians caring for patients with RCC. Crown

AB - Background: The conventional Fuhrman grading system, which categorizes renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with grades I, II, III, and IV, is the most widely used predictor assessment of RCC cancer-specific mortality (CSM). Objectives: The aim of this study was to test the prognostic ability of simplified Fuhrman grading schemes (FGSs) that rely on two- or three-tiered classifications. Design, setting, and participants: The current study addressed a population of 14 064 patients with clear cell RCC who were treated with partial or radical nephrectomy between 1988-2004, within nine Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) cancer registries. Measurements: Univariable and multivariable analyses as well as prognostic accuracy analyses were performed for various FGSs to test their ability to predict CSM rates. The conventional four-tiered FGS was compared to a modified two-tiered FGS in which grades I and II and grades III and IV were combined. A second simplified three-tiered FGS in which grades I and II were combined but grades III and IV were kept separate was also tested. Results and limitations: The overall 5-yr CSM-free rate was 81.5%. All three FGSs achieved independent predictor status in multivariable analyses. Prognostic accuracy of multivariable models that relied on various FGSs was 83.6% for the modified two-tiered FGS and 83.8% for both the conventional four-tiered and the modified three-tiered FGS. Conclusions: Our findings indicate that the simplified FGSs perform equally as well as the conventional four-tiered FGS. The use of simplified grading schemes may represent an advantage for pathologists as well as for clinicians caring for patients with RCC. Crown

KW - Classification

KW - Clear cell renal cell carcinoma

KW - Fuhrman grade

KW - Mortality

KW - Prognosis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70349287567&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70349287567&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.06.008

DO - 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.06.008

M3 - Article

C2 - 19573980

AN - SCOPUS:70349287567

VL - 56

SP - 775

EP - 781

JO - European Urology

JF - European Urology

SN - 0302-2838

IS - 5

ER -