A prospective evaluation of laparoscopic versus open left lateral hepatic sectionectomy

Luca Aldrighetti, Carlo Pulitanò, Marco Catena, Marcella Arru, Eleonora Guzzetti, Massimiliano Casati, Laura Comotti, Gianfranco Ferla

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

93 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Left lateral sectionectomy is one of the most commonly performed laparoscopic liver resections, but limited clinical data are actually available to support the advantage of laparoscopic versus open-liver surgery. The present study compared the short-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open surgery in a case-matched analysis. Surgical outcome of 20 patients who underwent left lateral sectionectomy by laparoscopic approach (LHR group) from September 2005 to January 2007 were compared in a case-control analysis with those of 20 patients who underwent open left lateral sectionectomy (OHR group). Both groups were similar for: tumor size, preoperative laboratory data, presence of cirrhosis, and histology of the lesion. Surgical procedures were performed in both groups combining the ultrasonic dissector and the ultrasonic coagulating cutter without portal clamping. Compared with OHR, the LHR group had a decreased blood loss (165 mL versus 214 mL, P∈=∈0.001), and earlier postoperative recovery (4.5 versus 5.8 days, P∈=∈0.003). There were no significant differences in terms of surgical margin and operative time. Morbidity was comparable between the two groups, but two cases of postoperative ascites were recorded in two cirrhotic patients in the OHR. Major complications were not observed in either groups. Laparoscopic resection results in reduced operative blood loss and earlier recovery with oncologic clearance and operative time comparable with open surgery. Laparoscopic liver surgery may be considered the approach of choice for tumors located in the left hepatic lobe.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)457-462
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
Volume12
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2008

Fingerprint

Liver
Operative Time
Ultrasonics
Ascites
Constriction
Laparoscopy
Neoplasms
Histology
Fibrosis
Morbidity
Margins of Excision

Keywords

  • Laparoscopic liver resection
  • Liver surgery
  • Ultrasonic coagulating cutter
  • Ultrasonic dissector

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

A prospective evaluation of laparoscopic versus open left lateral hepatic sectionectomy. / Aldrighetti, Luca; Pulitanò, Carlo; Catena, Marco; Arru, Marcella; Guzzetti, Eleonora; Casati, Massimiliano; Comotti, Laura; Ferla, Gianfranco.

In: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Vol. 12, No. 3, 03.2008, p. 457-462.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Aldrighetti, L, Pulitanò, C, Catena, M, Arru, M, Guzzetti, E, Casati, M, Comotti, L & Ferla, G 2008, 'A prospective evaluation of laparoscopic versus open left lateral hepatic sectionectomy', Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 457-462. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-007-0244-6
Aldrighetti, Luca ; Pulitanò, Carlo ; Catena, Marco ; Arru, Marcella ; Guzzetti, Eleonora ; Casati, Massimiliano ; Comotti, Laura ; Ferla, Gianfranco. / A prospective evaluation of laparoscopic versus open left lateral hepatic sectionectomy. In: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery. 2008 ; Vol. 12, No. 3. pp. 457-462.
@article{1c0d1eb16e964a5da56561809a4897ea,
title = "A prospective evaluation of laparoscopic versus open left lateral hepatic sectionectomy",
abstract = "Left lateral sectionectomy is one of the most commonly performed laparoscopic liver resections, but limited clinical data are actually available to support the advantage of laparoscopic versus open-liver surgery. The present study compared the short-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open surgery in a case-matched analysis. Surgical outcome of 20 patients who underwent left lateral sectionectomy by laparoscopic approach (LHR group) from September 2005 to January 2007 were compared in a case-control analysis with those of 20 patients who underwent open left lateral sectionectomy (OHR group). Both groups were similar for: tumor size, preoperative laboratory data, presence of cirrhosis, and histology of the lesion. Surgical procedures were performed in both groups combining the ultrasonic dissector and the ultrasonic coagulating cutter without portal clamping. Compared with OHR, the LHR group had a decreased blood loss (165 mL versus 214 mL, P∈=∈0.001), and earlier postoperative recovery (4.5 versus 5.8 days, P∈=∈0.003). There were no significant differences in terms of surgical margin and operative time. Morbidity was comparable between the two groups, but two cases of postoperative ascites were recorded in two cirrhotic patients in the OHR. Major complications were not observed in either groups. Laparoscopic resection results in reduced operative blood loss and earlier recovery with oncologic clearance and operative time comparable with open surgery. Laparoscopic liver surgery may be considered the approach of choice for tumors located in the left hepatic lobe.",
keywords = "Laparoscopic liver resection, Liver surgery, Ultrasonic coagulating cutter, Ultrasonic dissector",
author = "Luca Aldrighetti and Carlo Pulitan{\`o} and Marco Catena and Marcella Arru and Eleonora Guzzetti and Massimiliano Casati and Laura Comotti and Gianfranco Ferla",
year = "2008",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1007/s11605-007-0244-6",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "457--462",
journal = "Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery",
issn = "1091-255X",
publisher = "Springer New York LLC",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A prospective evaluation of laparoscopic versus open left lateral hepatic sectionectomy

AU - Aldrighetti, Luca

AU - Pulitanò, Carlo

AU - Catena, Marco

AU - Arru, Marcella

AU - Guzzetti, Eleonora

AU - Casati, Massimiliano

AU - Comotti, Laura

AU - Ferla, Gianfranco

PY - 2008/3

Y1 - 2008/3

N2 - Left lateral sectionectomy is one of the most commonly performed laparoscopic liver resections, but limited clinical data are actually available to support the advantage of laparoscopic versus open-liver surgery. The present study compared the short-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open surgery in a case-matched analysis. Surgical outcome of 20 patients who underwent left lateral sectionectomy by laparoscopic approach (LHR group) from September 2005 to January 2007 were compared in a case-control analysis with those of 20 patients who underwent open left lateral sectionectomy (OHR group). Both groups were similar for: tumor size, preoperative laboratory data, presence of cirrhosis, and histology of the lesion. Surgical procedures were performed in both groups combining the ultrasonic dissector and the ultrasonic coagulating cutter without portal clamping. Compared with OHR, the LHR group had a decreased blood loss (165 mL versus 214 mL, P∈=∈0.001), and earlier postoperative recovery (4.5 versus 5.8 days, P∈=∈0.003). There were no significant differences in terms of surgical margin and operative time. Morbidity was comparable between the two groups, but two cases of postoperative ascites were recorded in two cirrhotic patients in the OHR. Major complications were not observed in either groups. Laparoscopic resection results in reduced operative blood loss and earlier recovery with oncologic clearance and operative time comparable with open surgery. Laparoscopic liver surgery may be considered the approach of choice for tumors located in the left hepatic lobe.

AB - Left lateral sectionectomy is one of the most commonly performed laparoscopic liver resections, but limited clinical data are actually available to support the advantage of laparoscopic versus open-liver surgery. The present study compared the short-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open surgery in a case-matched analysis. Surgical outcome of 20 patients who underwent left lateral sectionectomy by laparoscopic approach (LHR group) from September 2005 to January 2007 were compared in a case-control analysis with those of 20 patients who underwent open left lateral sectionectomy (OHR group). Both groups were similar for: tumor size, preoperative laboratory data, presence of cirrhosis, and histology of the lesion. Surgical procedures were performed in both groups combining the ultrasonic dissector and the ultrasonic coagulating cutter without portal clamping. Compared with OHR, the LHR group had a decreased blood loss (165 mL versus 214 mL, P∈=∈0.001), and earlier postoperative recovery (4.5 versus 5.8 days, P∈=∈0.003). There were no significant differences in terms of surgical margin and operative time. Morbidity was comparable between the two groups, but two cases of postoperative ascites were recorded in two cirrhotic patients in the OHR. Major complications were not observed in either groups. Laparoscopic resection results in reduced operative blood loss and earlier recovery with oncologic clearance and operative time comparable with open surgery. Laparoscopic liver surgery may be considered the approach of choice for tumors located in the left hepatic lobe.

KW - Laparoscopic liver resection

KW - Liver surgery

KW - Ultrasonic coagulating cutter

KW - Ultrasonic dissector

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=38949132522&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=38949132522&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11605-007-0244-6

DO - 10.1007/s11605-007-0244-6

M3 - Article

C2 - 17701265

AN - SCOPUS:38949132522

VL - 12

SP - 457

EP - 462

JO - Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

JF - Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

SN - 1091-255X

IS - 3

ER -