A prospective randomized comparison between laparoscopic and laparotomic approaches in women with early stage endometrial cancer: A focus on the quality of life

Fulvio Zullo, Stefano Palomba, Tiziana Russo, Angela Falbo, Marilena Costantino, Achille Tolino, Errico Zupi, Piersandro Tagliaferri, Salvatore Venuta

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

119 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: This study was undertaken to compare the quality of life (QoL) in women with early stage endometrial cancer treated with 2 different surgical approaches. Study design: Eighty-four women with clinical stage I endometrial cancer were enrolled in a prospective randomized controlled trial design and treated with laparoscopic or laparotomic approach. Another 40 women matched for demographic characteristics were studied as controls. In patients, before and after surgery, and in their matched controls, QoL was evaluated by using the Short-Form Healthy Survey (SF-36) and the climacteric symptoms using the Kupperman Index (KI). Results: After randomization, no difference was detected in data recorded between the groups. At entry, QoL was similar in both treatment groups but significantly (P <.05) worse in comparison with controls. Throughout the study, QoL was significantly (P <.05) higher in laparoscopic group versus laparotomic group. After KI adjustment our data did not change. Conclusion: In early stage endometrial cancer, the laparoscopic approach provides significant benefits compared with laparotomy in terms of QoL.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1344-1352
Number of pages9
JournalAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Volume193
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2005

Fingerprint

Endometrial Neoplasms
Quality of Life
Random Allocation
Laparotomy
Research Design
Randomized Controlled Trials
Demography
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Endometrial cancer
  • Laparoscopy
  • Laparotomy
  • Quality of life
  • Surgery

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Cite this

A prospective randomized comparison between laparoscopic and laparotomic approaches in women with early stage endometrial cancer : A focus on the quality of life. / Zullo, Fulvio; Palomba, Stefano; Russo, Tiziana; Falbo, Angela; Costantino, Marilena; Tolino, Achille; Zupi, Errico; Tagliaferri, Piersandro; Venuta, Salvatore.

In: American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vol. 193, No. 4, 10.2005, p. 1344-1352.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Zullo, Fulvio ; Palomba, Stefano ; Russo, Tiziana ; Falbo, Angela ; Costantino, Marilena ; Tolino, Achille ; Zupi, Errico ; Tagliaferri, Piersandro ; Venuta, Salvatore. / A prospective randomized comparison between laparoscopic and laparotomic approaches in women with early stage endometrial cancer : A focus on the quality of life. In: American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2005 ; Vol. 193, No. 4. pp. 1344-1352.
@article{2efeb39fc5a14a5b9fd344a00b61e43e,
title = "A prospective randomized comparison between laparoscopic and laparotomic approaches in women with early stage endometrial cancer: A focus on the quality of life",
abstract = "Objective: This study was undertaken to compare the quality of life (QoL) in women with early stage endometrial cancer treated with 2 different surgical approaches. Study design: Eighty-four women with clinical stage I endometrial cancer were enrolled in a prospective randomized controlled trial design and treated with laparoscopic or laparotomic approach. Another 40 women matched for demographic characteristics were studied as controls. In patients, before and after surgery, and in their matched controls, QoL was evaluated by using the Short-Form Healthy Survey (SF-36) and the climacteric symptoms using the Kupperman Index (KI). Results: After randomization, no difference was detected in data recorded between the groups. At entry, QoL was similar in both treatment groups but significantly (P <.05) worse in comparison with controls. Throughout the study, QoL was significantly (P <.05) higher in laparoscopic group versus laparotomic group. After KI adjustment our data did not change. Conclusion: In early stage endometrial cancer, the laparoscopic approach provides significant benefits compared with laparotomy in terms of QoL.",
keywords = "Endometrial cancer, Laparoscopy, Laparotomy, Quality of life, Surgery",
author = "Fulvio Zullo and Stefano Palomba and Tiziana Russo and Angela Falbo and Marilena Costantino and Achille Tolino and Errico Zupi and Piersandro Tagliaferri and Salvatore Venuta",
year = "2005",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1016/j.ajog.2005.02.131",
language = "English",
volume = "193",
pages = "1344--1352",
journal = "American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology",
issn = "0002-9378",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A prospective randomized comparison between laparoscopic and laparotomic approaches in women with early stage endometrial cancer

T2 - A focus on the quality of life

AU - Zullo, Fulvio

AU - Palomba, Stefano

AU - Russo, Tiziana

AU - Falbo, Angela

AU - Costantino, Marilena

AU - Tolino, Achille

AU - Zupi, Errico

AU - Tagliaferri, Piersandro

AU - Venuta, Salvatore

PY - 2005/10

Y1 - 2005/10

N2 - Objective: This study was undertaken to compare the quality of life (QoL) in women with early stage endometrial cancer treated with 2 different surgical approaches. Study design: Eighty-four women with clinical stage I endometrial cancer were enrolled in a prospective randomized controlled trial design and treated with laparoscopic or laparotomic approach. Another 40 women matched for demographic characteristics were studied as controls. In patients, before and after surgery, and in their matched controls, QoL was evaluated by using the Short-Form Healthy Survey (SF-36) and the climacteric symptoms using the Kupperman Index (KI). Results: After randomization, no difference was detected in data recorded between the groups. At entry, QoL was similar in both treatment groups but significantly (P <.05) worse in comparison with controls. Throughout the study, QoL was significantly (P <.05) higher in laparoscopic group versus laparotomic group. After KI adjustment our data did not change. Conclusion: In early stage endometrial cancer, the laparoscopic approach provides significant benefits compared with laparotomy in terms of QoL.

AB - Objective: This study was undertaken to compare the quality of life (QoL) in women with early stage endometrial cancer treated with 2 different surgical approaches. Study design: Eighty-four women with clinical stage I endometrial cancer were enrolled in a prospective randomized controlled trial design and treated with laparoscopic or laparotomic approach. Another 40 women matched for demographic characteristics were studied as controls. In patients, before and after surgery, and in their matched controls, QoL was evaluated by using the Short-Form Healthy Survey (SF-36) and the climacteric symptoms using the Kupperman Index (KI). Results: After randomization, no difference was detected in data recorded between the groups. At entry, QoL was similar in both treatment groups but significantly (P <.05) worse in comparison with controls. Throughout the study, QoL was significantly (P <.05) higher in laparoscopic group versus laparotomic group. After KI adjustment our data did not change. Conclusion: In early stage endometrial cancer, the laparoscopic approach provides significant benefits compared with laparotomy in terms of QoL.

KW - Endometrial cancer

KW - Laparoscopy

KW - Laparotomy

KW - Quality of life

KW - Surgery

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=25844529454&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=25844529454&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.02.131

DO - 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.02.131

M3 - Article

C2 - 16202724

AN - SCOPUS:25844529454

VL - 193

SP - 1344

EP - 1352

JO - American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

JF - American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

SN - 0002-9378

IS - 4

ER -