Un metodo quantitativo di valutazione dell'utilita delle informazioni fornite al medico da un servizio di informazione sul farmaco

Risultati di uno studio pilota condotto dal servizio DOCTORline

Translated title of the contribution: A quantitative method for evaluating the usefulness of drug information

A. Nobili, G. Macario, M. Tettamanti, V. Cola, S. Papa

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Many articles were recently published in the British Medical Journal concerning information in the clinical practice; they also discussed the application of the Shaughnessy's formula on evaluating different kinds of informations retrieved. Objectives. To test the the capability of the formula to evaluate and rate each response given in a medical information service. Methods. The factors of the formula (Utility = Relevance x Validity / Work) were rated according to a 5 point scale, obtaining results ranging between 0.20 to 25. Then the implementation of the formula was tested on a sequential sample of 80 requests of drug information received by the DOCTORline service in July-August 1997. Results. Mean values of relevance, validity and work were respectively 3.1 (±0.8), 3.2 (±1.3) and 3.2 (±1.5). No correlation was found between the factors (relevance vs. validity r=0.10; relevance vs. work r=0.03; validity vs. work r=0.08). Mean value of the answers given to the 80 questions was 4.8 (±5) and their distribution seemed bimodal. Conclusions. We discuss how monitoring and controlling the quality of an information system for the physicians can benefit from the applications of this formula, and the problems related to the low number of answers we analized and the difficulty in standardizing the values to be given to the factors.

Original languageItalian
Pages (from-to)10-15
Number of pages6
JournalGiornale Italiano di Farmacia Clinica
Volume12
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 1998

Fingerprint

Pharmaceutical Preparations
Information Services
Information Systems
Physicians

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pharmacology (medical)

Cite this

@article{bba50a904e4c4bfda433f42fda4ff1f8,
title = "Un metodo quantitativo di valutazione dell'utilita delle informazioni fornite al medico da un servizio di informazione sul farmaco: Risultati di uno studio pilota condotto dal servizio DOCTORline",
abstract = "Many articles were recently published in the British Medical Journal concerning information in the clinical practice; they also discussed the application of the Shaughnessy's formula on evaluating different kinds of informations retrieved. Objectives. To test the the capability of the formula to evaluate and rate each response given in a medical information service. Methods. The factors of the formula (Utility = Relevance x Validity / Work) were rated according to a 5 point scale, obtaining results ranging between 0.20 to 25. Then the implementation of the formula was tested on a sequential sample of 80 requests of drug information received by the DOCTORline service in July-August 1997. Results. Mean values of relevance, validity and work were respectively 3.1 (±0.8), 3.2 (±1.3) and 3.2 (±1.5). No correlation was found between the factors (relevance vs. validity r=0.10; relevance vs. work r=0.03; validity vs. work r=0.08). Mean value of the answers given to the 80 questions was 4.8 (±5) and their distribution seemed bimodal. Conclusions. We discuss how monitoring and controlling the quality of an information system for the physicians can benefit from the applications of this formula, and the problems related to the low number of answers we analized and the difficulty in standardizing the values to be given to the factors.",
keywords = "Drug information services, Evaluation methodology, Medical, Models, Usefulness",
author = "A. Nobili and G. Macario and M. Tettamanti and V. Cola and S. Papa",
year = "1998",
language = "Italian",
volume = "12",
pages = "10--15",
journal = "Giornale Italiano di Farmacia Clinica",
issn = "1120-3749",
publisher = "Il Pensiero Scientifico Editore s.r.l.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Un metodo quantitativo di valutazione dell'utilita delle informazioni fornite al medico da un servizio di informazione sul farmaco

T2 - Risultati di uno studio pilota condotto dal servizio DOCTORline

AU - Nobili, A.

AU - Macario, G.

AU - Tettamanti, M.

AU - Cola, V.

AU - Papa, S.

PY - 1998

Y1 - 1998

N2 - Many articles were recently published in the British Medical Journal concerning information in the clinical practice; they also discussed the application of the Shaughnessy's formula on evaluating different kinds of informations retrieved. Objectives. To test the the capability of the formula to evaluate and rate each response given in a medical information service. Methods. The factors of the formula (Utility = Relevance x Validity / Work) were rated according to a 5 point scale, obtaining results ranging between 0.20 to 25. Then the implementation of the formula was tested on a sequential sample of 80 requests of drug information received by the DOCTORline service in July-August 1997. Results. Mean values of relevance, validity and work were respectively 3.1 (±0.8), 3.2 (±1.3) and 3.2 (±1.5). No correlation was found between the factors (relevance vs. validity r=0.10; relevance vs. work r=0.03; validity vs. work r=0.08). Mean value of the answers given to the 80 questions was 4.8 (±5) and their distribution seemed bimodal. Conclusions. We discuss how monitoring and controlling the quality of an information system for the physicians can benefit from the applications of this formula, and the problems related to the low number of answers we analized and the difficulty in standardizing the values to be given to the factors.

AB - Many articles were recently published in the British Medical Journal concerning information in the clinical practice; they also discussed the application of the Shaughnessy's formula on evaluating different kinds of informations retrieved. Objectives. To test the the capability of the formula to evaluate and rate each response given in a medical information service. Methods. The factors of the formula (Utility = Relevance x Validity / Work) were rated according to a 5 point scale, obtaining results ranging between 0.20 to 25. Then the implementation of the formula was tested on a sequential sample of 80 requests of drug information received by the DOCTORline service in July-August 1997. Results. Mean values of relevance, validity and work were respectively 3.1 (±0.8), 3.2 (±1.3) and 3.2 (±1.5). No correlation was found between the factors (relevance vs. validity r=0.10; relevance vs. work r=0.03; validity vs. work r=0.08). Mean value of the answers given to the 80 questions was 4.8 (±5) and their distribution seemed bimodal. Conclusions. We discuss how monitoring and controlling the quality of an information system for the physicians can benefit from the applications of this formula, and the problems related to the low number of answers we analized and the difficulty in standardizing the values to be given to the factors.

KW - Drug information services

KW - Evaluation methodology

KW - Medical

KW - Models

KW - Usefulness

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031831169&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031831169&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Articolo

VL - 12

SP - 10

EP - 15

JO - Giornale Italiano di Farmacia Clinica

JF - Giornale Italiano di Farmacia Clinica

SN - 1120-3749

IS - 1

ER -