A randomized trial on breast self-examination in Faenza (Northern-Italy)

Salvatore Ferro, Annalisa Caroli, Oriana Nanni, Annibale Biggeri, Angelo Gambi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Aims and background: The aim of this randomized controlled trial was to compare two methods for teaching breast self-examination: theoretical and practical session versus mailed material. Methods: A random sample of women aged 20-64 years was drawn from the demographic file of the city of Faenza (Northern-Italy). Of 825 sampled eligible women, 168 declined participation, 657 were randomly assigned, after completing a pretest questionnaire aimed at evaluating practice and quality of breast self-examination. Individualised instruction was administered to the treatment group invited to be taught breast self-examination in a medical practice setting. The control group received mailed information about breast self-examination. One year later, 443 women completed the posttest questionnaire. Results: As far as concerns the first outcome of the trial (change in practice of breast-self examination) our study showed, after adjusting for lost-to-follow-up, no difference between the treatment and the control group. The analysis performed to evaluate the second outcome (change in quality of breast self-examination practice) showed that women of the treatment group improved the quality of breast self-examination practice more than the control group (Wilcoxon test, z = 2.4, P <0.01). The same results have been confirmed by multiple regression analyses taking into account all potential confounders. No selection bias affected these results. Conclusion: Theoretical and practical sessions resulted in an improved quality of examination technique than did mailed material.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)329-334
Number of pages6
JournalTumori
Volume82
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - Jul 1996

Fingerprint

Breast Self-Examination
Italy
Control Groups
Selection Bias
Lost to Follow-Up
Teaching
Therapeutics
Randomized Controlled Trials
Regression Analysis
Demography

Keywords

  • breast cancer
  • breast self-examination
  • randomized controlled trials

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cancer Research

Cite this

Ferro, S., Caroli, A., Nanni, O., Biggeri, A., & Gambi, A. (1996). A randomized trial on breast self-examination in Faenza (Northern-Italy). Tumori, 82(4), 329-334.

A randomized trial on breast self-examination in Faenza (Northern-Italy). / Ferro, Salvatore; Caroli, Annalisa; Nanni, Oriana; Biggeri, Annibale; Gambi, Angelo.

In: Tumori, Vol. 82, No. 4, 07.1996, p. 329-334.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ferro, S, Caroli, A, Nanni, O, Biggeri, A & Gambi, A 1996, 'A randomized trial on breast self-examination in Faenza (Northern-Italy)', Tumori, vol. 82, no. 4, pp. 329-334.
Ferro S, Caroli A, Nanni O, Biggeri A, Gambi A. A randomized trial on breast self-examination in Faenza (Northern-Italy). Tumori. 1996 Jul;82(4):329-334.
Ferro, Salvatore ; Caroli, Annalisa ; Nanni, Oriana ; Biggeri, Annibale ; Gambi, Angelo. / A randomized trial on breast self-examination in Faenza (Northern-Italy). In: Tumori. 1996 ; Vol. 82, No. 4. pp. 329-334.
@article{a67cabeef1c64ae9823cd90a57a13c8f,
title = "A randomized trial on breast self-examination in Faenza (Northern-Italy)",
abstract = "Aims and background: The aim of this randomized controlled trial was to compare two methods for teaching breast self-examination: theoretical and practical session versus mailed material. Methods: A random sample of women aged 20-64 years was drawn from the demographic file of the city of Faenza (Northern-Italy). Of 825 sampled eligible women, 168 declined participation, 657 were randomly assigned, after completing a pretest questionnaire aimed at evaluating practice and quality of breast self-examination. Individualised instruction was administered to the treatment group invited to be taught breast self-examination in a medical practice setting. The control group received mailed information about breast self-examination. One year later, 443 women completed the posttest questionnaire. Results: As far as concerns the first outcome of the trial (change in practice of breast-self examination) our study showed, after adjusting for lost-to-follow-up, no difference between the treatment and the control group. The analysis performed to evaluate the second outcome (change in quality of breast self-examination practice) showed that women of the treatment group improved the quality of breast self-examination practice more than the control group (Wilcoxon test, z = 2.4, P <0.01). The same results have been confirmed by multiple regression analyses taking into account all potential confounders. No selection bias affected these results. Conclusion: Theoretical and practical sessions resulted in an improved quality of examination technique than did mailed material.",
keywords = "breast cancer, breast self-examination, randomized controlled trials",
author = "Salvatore Ferro and Annalisa Caroli and Oriana Nanni and Annibale Biggeri and Angelo Gambi",
year = "1996",
month = "7",
language = "English",
volume = "82",
pages = "329--334",
journal = "Tumori",
issn = "0300-8916",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A randomized trial on breast self-examination in Faenza (Northern-Italy)

AU - Ferro, Salvatore

AU - Caroli, Annalisa

AU - Nanni, Oriana

AU - Biggeri, Annibale

AU - Gambi, Angelo

PY - 1996/7

Y1 - 1996/7

N2 - Aims and background: The aim of this randomized controlled trial was to compare two methods for teaching breast self-examination: theoretical and practical session versus mailed material. Methods: A random sample of women aged 20-64 years was drawn from the demographic file of the city of Faenza (Northern-Italy). Of 825 sampled eligible women, 168 declined participation, 657 were randomly assigned, after completing a pretest questionnaire aimed at evaluating practice and quality of breast self-examination. Individualised instruction was administered to the treatment group invited to be taught breast self-examination in a medical practice setting. The control group received mailed information about breast self-examination. One year later, 443 women completed the posttest questionnaire. Results: As far as concerns the first outcome of the trial (change in practice of breast-self examination) our study showed, after adjusting for lost-to-follow-up, no difference between the treatment and the control group. The analysis performed to evaluate the second outcome (change in quality of breast self-examination practice) showed that women of the treatment group improved the quality of breast self-examination practice more than the control group (Wilcoxon test, z = 2.4, P <0.01). The same results have been confirmed by multiple regression analyses taking into account all potential confounders. No selection bias affected these results. Conclusion: Theoretical and practical sessions resulted in an improved quality of examination technique than did mailed material.

AB - Aims and background: The aim of this randomized controlled trial was to compare two methods for teaching breast self-examination: theoretical and practical session versus mailed material. Methods: A random sample of women aged 20-64 years was drawn from the demographic file of the city of Faenza (Northern-Italy). Of 825 sampled eligible women, 168 declined participation, 657 were randomly assigned, after completing a pretest questionnaire aimed at evaluating practice and quality of breast self-examination. Individualised instruction was administered to the treatment group invited to be taught breast self-examination in a medical practice setting. The control group received mailed information about breast self-examination. One year later, 443 women completed the posttest questionnaire. Results: As far as concerns the first outcome of the trial (change in practice of breast-self examination) our study showed, after adjusting for lost-to-follow-up, no difference between the treatment and the control group. The analysis performed to evaluate the second outcome (change in quality of breast self-examination practice) showed that women of the treatment group improved the quality of breast self-examination practice more than the control group (Wilcoxon test, z = 2.4, P <0.01). The same results have been confirmed by multiple regression analyses taking into account all potential confounders. No selection bias affected these results. Conclusion: Theoretical and practical sessions resulted in an improved quality of examination technique than did mailed material.

KW - breast cancer

KW - breast self-examination

KW - randomized controlled trials

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029828490&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029828490&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 8890965

AN - SCOPUS:0029828490

VL - 82

SP - 329

EP - 334

JO - Tumori

JF - Tumori

SN - 0300-8916

IS - 4

ER -