A survey on infection management practices in Italian ICUs

Matteo Bassetti, Raffaele De Gaudio, Teresita Mazzei, Giulia Morace, Nicola Petrosillo, Pierluigi Viale, Giuseppe Bello, Sofia La Face, Massimo Antonelli

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: An online survey was conducted to characterize current infection management practices in Italian intensive care units (ICUs), including the antibacterial and antifungal drug regimens prescribed for various types of infections.Methods: During February and March 2011, all 450 ICUs in public hospitals in Italy were invited to take part in an online survey. The questionnaire focused on ICU characteristics, methods used to prevent, diagnose, and treat infections, and antimicrobials prescribing policies. The frequency of each reported practice was calculated as a percentage of the total number of units answering the question. The overall response rate to the questionnaire was 38.8% (175 of the 450 ICUs contacted) with homogeneous distribution across the country and in terms of unit type.Results: Eighty-eight percent of the responding facilities performed periodical surveillance cultures on all patients. In 71% of patients, cultures were also collected on admission. Endotracheal/bronchial aspirates were the most frequently cultured specimens at both time points. Two-thirds of the responding units had never performed screening cultures for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Around 67% of the ICUs reported the use of antimicrobial de-escalation strategies during the treatment phase. In general, the use of empirical antimicrobial drug regimens was appropriate. Although the rationale for the choice was not always clearly documented, the use of a combination therapy was preferred over antibiotic monotherapy. The preferred first-line agents for invasive candidiasis were fluconazole and an echinocandin (64% and 25%, respectively). Two-thirds of the ICUs monitored vancomycin serum levels and administered it by continuous infusion in 86% of cases. For certain antibiotics, reported doses were too low to ensure effective treatment of severe infections in critically ill patients; conversely, inappropriately high doses were administered for certain antifungal drugs.Conclusions: Although infection control policies and management practices are generally appropriate in Italian ICUs, certain aspects, such as the extensive use of multidrug empirical regimens and the inappropriate antimicrobial dosing, deserve careful management and closer investigation.

Original languageEnglish
Article numberR221
JournalCritical Care
Volume16
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 15 2012

Fingerprint

Practice Management
Intensive Care Units
Infection
Invasive Candidiasis
Pharmaceutical Preparations
Echinocandins
Anti-Bacterial Agents
Fluconazole
Public Hospitals
Vancomycin
Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus
Infection Control
Surveys and Questionnaires
Critical Illness
Italy
Therapeutics
Serum

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Bassetti, M., De Gaudio, R., Mazzei, T., Morace, G., Petrosillo, N., Viale, P., ... Antonelli, M. (2012). A survey on infection management practices in Italian ICUs. Critical Care, 16(6), [R221]. https://doi.org/10.1186/cc11866

A survey on infection management practices in Italian ICUs. / Bassetti, Matteo; De Gaudio, Raffaele; Mazzei, Teresita; Morace, Giulia; Petrosillo, Nicola; Viale, Pierluigi; Bello, Giuseppe; La Face, Sofia; Antonelli, Massimo.

In: Critical Care, Vol. 16, No. 6, R221, 15.11.2012.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bassetti, M, De Gaudio, R, Mazzei, T, Morace, G, Petrosillo, N, Viale, P, Bello, G, La Face, S & Antonelli, M 2012, 'A survey on infection management practices in Italian ICUs', Critical Care, vol. 16, no. 6, R221. https://doi.org/10.1186/cc11866
Bassetti M, De Gaudio R, Mazzei T, Morace G, Petrosillo N, Viale P et al. A survey on infection management practices in Italian ICUs. Critical Care. 2012 Nov 15;16(6). R221. https://doi.org/10.1186/cc11866
Bassetti, Matteo ; De Gaudio, Raffaele ; Mazzei, Teresita ; Morace, Giulia ; Petrosillo, Nicola ; Viale, Pierluigi ; Bello, Giuseppe ; La Face, Sofia ; Antonelli, Massimo. / A survey on infection management practices in Italian ICUs. In: Critical Care. 2012 ; Vol. 16, No. 6.
@article{bfe407d31fe3438aa3b7ef077e54f1a1,
title = "A survey on infection management practices in Italian ICUs",
abstract = "Introduction: An online survey was conducted to characterize current infection management practices in Italian intensive care units (ICUs), including the antibacterial and antifungal drug regimens prescribed for various types of infections.Methods: During February and March 2011, all 450 ICUs in public hospitals in Italy were invited to take part in an online survey. The questionnaire focused on ICU characteristics, methods used to prevent, diagnose, and treat infections, and antimicrobials prescribing policies. The frequency of each reported practice was calculated as a percentage of the total number of units answering the question. The overall response rate to the questionnaire was 38.8{\%} (175 of the 450 ICUs contacted) with homogeneous distribution across the country and in terms of unit type.Results: Eighty-eight percent of the responding facilities performed periodical surveillance cultures on all patients. In 71{\%} of patients, cultures were also collected on admission. Endotracheal/bronchial aspirates were the most frequently cultured specimens at both time points. Two-thirds of the responding units had never performed screening cultures for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Around 67{\%} of the ICUs reported the use of antimicrobial de-escalation strategies during the treatment phase. In general, the use of empirical antimicrobial drug regimens was appropriate. Although the rationale for the choice was not always clearly documented, the use of a combination therapy was preferred over antibiotic monotherapy. The preferred first-line agents for invasive candidiasis were fluconazole and an echinocandin (64{\%} and 25{\%}, respectively). Two-thirds of the ICUs monitored vancomycin serum levels and administered it by continuous infusion in 86{\%} of cases. For certain antibiotics, reported doses were too low to ensure effective treatment of severe infections in critically ill patients; conversely, inappropriately high doses were administered for certain antifungal drugs.Conclusions: Although infection control policies and management practices are generally appropriate in Italian ICUs, certain aspects, such as the extensive use of multidrug empirical regimens and the inappropriate antimicrobial dosing, deserve careful management and closer investigation.",
author = "Matteo Bassetti and {De Gaudio}, Raffaele and Teresita Mazzei and Giulia Morace and Nicola Petrosillo and Pierluigi Viale and Giuseppe Bello and {La Face}, Sofia and Massimo Antonelli",
year = "2012",
month = "11",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1186/cc11866",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
journal = "Critical Care",
issn = "1466-609X",
publisher = "Springer Science + Business Media",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A survey on infection management practices in Italian ICUs

AU - Bassetti, Matteo

AU - De Gaudio, Raffaele

AU - Mazzei, Teresita

AU - Morace, Giulia

AU - Petrosillo, Nicola

AU - Viale, Pierluigi

AU - Bello, Giuseppe

AU - La Face, Sofia

AU - Antonelli, Massimo

PY - 2012/11/15

Y1 - 2012/11/15

N2 - Introduction: An online survey was conducted to characterize current infection management practices in Italian intensive care units (ICUs), including the antibacterial and antifungal drug regimens prescribed for various types of infections.Methods: During February and March 2011, all 450 ICUs in public hospitals in Italy were invited to take part in an online survey. The questionnaire focused on ICU characteristics, methods used to prevent, diagnose, and treat infections, and antimicrobials prescribing policies. The frequency of each reported practice was calculated as a percentage of the total number of units answering the question. The overall response rate to the questionnaire was 38.8% (175 of the 450 ICUs contacted) with homogeneous distribution across the country and in terms of unit type.Results: Eighty-eight percent of the responding facilities performed periodical surveillance cultures on all patients. In 71% of patients, cultures were also collected on admission. Endotracheal/bronchial aspirates were the most frequently cultured specimens at both time points. Two-thirds of the responding units had never performed screening cultures for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Around 67% of the ICUs reported the use of antimicrobial de-escalation strategies during the treatment phase. In general, the use of empirical antimicrobial drug regimens was appropriate. Although the rationale for the choice was not always clearly documented, the use of a combination therapy was preferred over antibiotic monotherapy. The preferred first-line agents for invasive candidiasis were fluconazole and an echinocandin (64% and 25%, respectively). Two-thirds of the ICUs monitored vancomycin serum levels and administered it by continuous infusion in 86% of cases. For certain antibiotics, reported doses were too low to ensure effective treatment of severe infections in critically ill patients; conversely, inappropriately high doses were administered for certain antifungal drugs.Conclusions: Although infection control policies and management practices are generally appropriate in Italian ICUs, certain aspects, such as the extensive use of multidrug empirical regimens and the inappropriate antimicrobial dosing, deserve careful management and closer investigation.

AB - Introduction: An online survey was conducted to characterize current infection management practices in Italian intensive care units (ICUs), including the antibacterial and antifungal drug regimens prescribed for various types of infections.Methods: During February and March 2011, all 450 ICUs in public hospitals in Italy were invited to take part in an online survey. The questionnaire focused on ICU characteristics, methods used to prevent, diagnose, and treat infections, and antimicrobials prescribing policies. The frequency of each reported practice was calculated as a percentage of the total number of units answering the question. The overall response rate to the questionnaire was 38.8% (175 of the 450 ICUs contacted) with homogeneous distribution across the country and in terms of unit type.Results: Eighty-eight percent of the responding facilities performed periodical surveillance cultures on all patients. In 71% of patients, cultures were also collected on admission. Endotracheal/bronchial aspirates were the most frequently cultured specimens at both time points. Two-thirds of the responding units had never performed screening cultures for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Around 67% of the ICUs reported the use of antimicrobial de-escalation strategies during the treatment phase. In general, the use of empirical antimicrobial drug regimens was appropriate. Although the rationale for the choice was not always clearly documented, the use of a combination therapy was preferred over antibiotic monotherapy. The preferred first-line agents for invasive candidiasis were fluconazole and an echinocandin (64% and 25%, respectively). Two-thirds of the ICUs monitored vancomycin serum levels and administered it by continuous infusion in 86% of cases. For certain antibiotics, reported doses were too low to ensure effective treatment of severe infections in critically ill patients; conversely, inappropriately high doses were administered for certain antifungal drugs.Conclusions: Although infection control policies and management practices are generally appropriate in Italian ICUs, certain aspects, such as the extensive use of multidrug empirical regimens and the inappropriate antimicrobial dosing, deserve careful management and closer investigation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84868681349&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84868681349&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/cc11866

DO - 10.1186/cc11866

M3 - Article

VL - 16

JO - Critical Care

JF - Critical Care

SN - 1466-609X

IS - 6

M1 - R221

ER -