A systematic review of factors associated with accidental falls in people with multiple sclerosis

A meta-analytic approach

Costanza Giannì, Luca Prosperini, Johanna Jonsdottir, Davide Cattaneo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

45 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether there are demographic, clinical, and instrumental variables useful to detect fall status of patients with multiple sclerosis. Data sources: PubMed and the Cochrane Library. Review methods: Eligible studies were identified by two independent investigators. Only studies having a clear distinction between fallers and non-fallers were included and meta-analysed. Odds ratios (ORs) and standard mean differences (SMDs) were calculated and pooled using fixed effect models. Results: Among 115 screened articles, 15 fulfilled criteria for meta-analyses, with a total of 2425 patients included. Proportion of fallers may vary from 30% to 63% in a time frame from 1 to 12 months. No significant publication bias was found, even though 12/15 studies relied on retrospective reports of falls, thus introducing recall biases. Risk factors for falls varied across studies, owing to heterogeneity of populations included and clinical instruments used. The meta-analytic approach found that, compared with non-fallers, fallers had longer disease duration (SMD = 0.14, p = 0.02), progressive course of disease (OR = 2.02, p <0.0001), assistive device for walking (OR = 3.16, p <0.0001), greater overall disability level (SMD = 0.74, p <0.0001), slower walking speed (SMD = 0.45, p = 0.0005), and worse performances in balance tests (Berg Balance Scale: SMD = -0.48, p = 0.002; Timed up-and-go test, SMD = 0.31, p = 0.04), and force-platform measures (postural sway) with eyes opened (SMD = 0.71, p = 0.006) and closed (SMD = 0.83, p = 0.01), respectively. Conclusion: Elucidations regarding risk factors for accidental falls in patients with multiple sclerosis (PwMs) are provided here, with worse disability score, progressive course, use of walking aid, and poorer performances in static and dynamic balance tests strongly associated with fall status.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)704-716
Number of pages13
JournalClinical Rehabilitation
Volume28
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Accidental Falls
Multiple Sclerosis
Odds Ratio
Walking
Self-Help Devices
Publication Bias
Information Storage and Retrieval
Population Characteristics
PubMed
Libraries
Meta-Analysis
Research Personnel
Demography

Keywords

  • Accidental falls
  • disability
  • imbalance
  • meta-analysis
  • multiple sclerosis
  • systematic review

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rehabilitation
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

A systematic review of factors associated with accidental falls in people with multiple sclerosis : A meta-analytic approach. / Giannì, Costanza; Prosperini, Luca; Jonsdottir, Johanna; Cattaneo, Davide.

In: Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 28, No. 7, 2014, p. 704-716.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0ead9f569d014326a4acbc298f9ac9b0,
title = "A systematic review of factors associated with accidental falls in people with multiple sclerosis: A meta-analytic approach",
abstract = "Objective: To determine whether there are demographic, clinical, and instrumental variables useful to detect fall status of patients with multiple sclerosis. Data sources: PubMed and the Cochrane Library. Review methods: Eligible studies were identified by two independent investigators. Only studies having a clear distinction between fallers and non-fallers were included and meta-analysed. Odds ratios (ORs) and standard mean differences (SMDs) were calculated and pooled using fixed effect models. Results: Among 115 screened articles, 15 fulfilled criteria for meta-analyses, with a total of 2425 patients included. Proportion of fallers may vary from 30{\%} to 63{\%} in a time frame from 1 to 12 months. No significant publication bias was found, even though 12/15 studies relied on retrospective reports of falls, thus introducing recall biases. Risk factors for falls varied across studies, owing to heterogeneity of populations included and clinical instruments used. The meta-analytic approach found that, compared with non-fallers, fallers had longer disease duration (SMD = 0.14, p = 0.02), progressive course of disease (OR = 2.02, p <0.0001), assistive device for walking (OR = 3.16, p <0.0001), greater overall disability level (SMD = 0.74, p <0.0001), slower walking speed (SMD = 0.45, p = 0.0005), and worse performances in balance tests (Berg Balance Scale: SMD = -0.48, p = 0.002; Timed up-and-go test, SMD = 0.31, p = 0.04), and force-platform measures (postural sway) with eyes opened (SMD = 0.71, p = 0.006) and closed (SMD = 0.83, p = 0.01), respectively. Conclusion: Elucidations regarding risk factors for accidental falls in patients with multiple sclerosis (PwMs) are provided here, with worse disability score, progressive course, use of walking aid, and poorer performances in static and dynamic balance tests strongly associated with fall status.",
keywords = "Accidental falls, disability, imbalance, meta-analysis, multiple sclerosis, systematic review",
author = "Costanza Giann{\`i} and Luca Prosperini and Johanna Jonsdottir and Davide Cattaneo",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1177/0269215513517575",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "704--716",
journal = "Clinical Rehabilitation",
issn = "0269-2155",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd STM",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A systematic review of factors associated with accidental falls in people with multiple sclerosis

T2 - A meta-analytic approach

AU - Giannì, Costanza

AU - Prosperini, Luca

AU - Jonsdottir, Johanna

AU - Cattaneo, Davide

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Objective: To determine whether there are demographic, clinical, and instrumental variables useful to detect fall status of patients with multiple sclerosis. Data sources: PubMed and the Cochrane Library. Review methods: Eligible studies were identified by two independent investigators. Only studies having a clear distinction between fallers and non-fallers were included and meta-analysed. Odds ratios (ORs) and standard mean differences (SMDs) were calculated and pooled using fixed effect models. Results: Among 115 screened articles, 15 fulfilled criteria for meta-analyses, with a total of 2425 patients included. Proportion of fallers may vary from 30% to 63% in a time frame from 1 to 12 months. No significant publication bias was found, even though 12/15 studies relied on retrospective reports of falls, thus introducing recall biases. Risk factors for falls varied across studies, owing to heterogeneity of populations included and clinical instruments used. The meta-analytic approach found that, compared with non-fallers, fallers had longer disease duration (SMD = 0.14, p = 0.02), progressive course of disease (OR = 2.02, p <0.0001), assistive device for walking (OR = 3.16, p <0.0001), greater overall disability level (SMD = 0.74, p <0.0001), slower walking speed (SMD = 0.45, p = 0.0005), and worse performances in balance tests (Berg Balance Scale: SMD = -0.48, p = 0.002; Timed up-and-go test, SMD = 0.31, p = 0.04), and force-platform measures (postural sway) with eyes opened (SMD = 0.71, p = 0.006) and closed (SMD = 0.83, p = 0.01), respectively. Conclusion: Elucidations regarding risk factors for accidental falls in patients with multiple sclerosis (PwMs) are provided here, with worse disability score, progressive course, use of walking aid, and poorer performances in static and dynamic balance tests strongly associated with fall status.

AB - Objective: To determine whether there are demographic, clinical, and instrumental variables useful to detect fall status of patients with multiple sclerosis. Data sources: PubMed and the Cochrane Library. Review methods: Eligible studies were identified by two independent investigators. Only studies having a clear distinction between fallers and non-fallers were included and meta-analysed. Odds ratios (ORs) and standard mean differences (SMDs) were calculated and pooled using fixed effect models. Results: Among 115 screened articles, 15 fulfilled criteria for meta-analyses, with a total of 2425 patients included. Proportion of fallers may vary from 30% to 63% in a time frame from 1 to 12 months. No significant publication bias was found, even though 12/15 studies relied on retrospective reports of falls, thus introducing recall biases. Risk factors for falls varied across studies, owing to heterogeneity of populations included and clinical instruments used. The meta-analytic approach found that, compared with non-fallers, fallers had longer disease duration (SMD = 0.14, p = 0.02), progressive course of disease (OR = 2.02, p <0.0001), assistive device for walking (OR = 3.16, p <0.0001), greater overall disability level (SMD = 0.74, p <0.0001), slower walking speed (SMD = 0.45, p = 0.0005), and worse performances in balance tests (Berg Balance Scale: SMD = -0.48, p = 0.002; Timed up-and-go test, SMD = 0.31, p = 0.04), and force-platform measures (postural sway) with eyes opened (SMD = 0.71, p = 0.006) and closed (SMD = 0.83, p = 0.01), respectively. Conclusion: Elucidations regarding risk factors for accidental falls in patients with multiple sclerosis (PwMs) are provided here, with worse disability score, progressive course, use of walking aid, and poorer performances in static and dynamic balance tests strongly associated with fall status.

KW - Accidental falls

KW - disability

KW - imbalance

KW - meta-analysis

KW - multiple sclerosis

KW - systematic review

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84902346988&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84902346988&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0269215513517575

DO - 10.1177/0269215513517575

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 704

EP - 716

JO - Clinical Rehabilitation

JF - Clinical Rehabilitation

SN - 0269-2155

IS - 7

ER -