A-tDCS on the ipsilesional parietal cortex boosts the effects of prism adaptation treatment in neglect

Elisabetta Làdavas, Sara Giulietti, Alessio Avenanti, Caterina Bertini, Eleonora Lorenzini, Cristina Quinquinio, Andrea Serino

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background and objective: The aim of the study is to compare the effects of multiple sessions of cathodal (c-tDCS) or anodal tDCS (a-tDCS) in modulating the beneficial effects of prism adaptation (PA) treatment in neglect patients. Methods: 30 neglect patients were submitted to 10 daily sessions of PA treatment. Patients were pseudo-randomly divided into 3 groups. In the c-tDCS-group, each PA session was coupled with 20 minutes of cathodal stimulation of the left, intact PPC; in the a-tDCS-group, anodal stimulation was applied to PPC of the damaged hemisphere; in the Sham group, sham stimulation was applied. Neglect was evaluated before and after treatment with the Behavioral Inattention Test. Results: Combined tDCS-PA treatment induced stronger neglect improvement in the a-tDCS group as compared to the Sham group. No improvement was found in the c-tDCSgroup, with respect to that normally induced by PA and found in the Sham group. Conclusions: c-tDCS abolished neglect amelioration after PA, possibly because stimulation affected the sensorimotor network controlling prism adaptation. Instead, a-tDCS PPC boosted neglect amelioration after PAprobably thanks to increased excitability of residual tissue in the lesioned hemisphere, which in turn might reduce dysfunctional over-excitability of the intact hemisphere.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)647-662
Number of pages16
JournalRestorative Neurology and Neuroscience
Volume33
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 5 2015

Fingerprint

Parietal Lobe
Therapeutics
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

Keywords

  • Neglect
  • Prism Adaptation
  • tDCS

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neurology
  • Developmental Neuroscience
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

A-tDCS on the ipsilesional parietal cortex boosts the effects of prism adaptation treatment in neglect. / Làdavas, Elisabetta; Giulietti, Sara; Avenanti, Alessio; Bertini, Caterina; Lorenzini, Eleonora; Quinquinio, Cristina; Serino, Andrea.

In: Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, Vol. 33, No. 5, 05.10.2015, p. 647-662.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Làdavas, Elisabetta ; Giulietti, Sara ; Avenanti, Alessio ; Bertini, Caterina ; Lorenzini, Eleonora ; Quinquinio, Cristina ; Serino, Andrea. / A-tDCS on the ipsilesional parietal cortex boosts the effects of prism adaptation treatment in neglect. In: Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience. 2015 ; Vol. 33, No. 5. pp. 647-662.
@article{f516e12b8cc0471eac42916cc9f01563,
title = "A-tDCS on the ipsilesional parietal cortex boosts the effects of prism adaptation treatment in neglect",
abstract = "Background and objective: The aim of the study is to compare the effects of multiple sessions of cathodal (c-tDCS) or anodal tDCS (a-tDCS) in modulating the beneficial effects of prism adaptation (PA) treatment in neglect patients. Methods: 30 neglect patients were submitted to 10 daily sessions of PA treatment. Patients were pseudo-randomly divided into 3 groups. In the c-tDCS-group, each PA session was coupled with 20 minutes of cathodal stimulation of the left, intact PPC; in the a-tDCS-group, anodal stimulation was applied to PPC of the damaged hemisphere; in the Sham group, sham stimulation was applied. Neglect was evaluated before and after treatment with the Behavioral Inattention Test. Results: Combined tDCS-PA treatment induced stronger neglect improvement in the a-tDCS group as compared to the Sham group. No improvement was found in the c-tDCSgroup, with respect to that normally induced by PA and found in the Sham group. Conclusions: c-tDCS abolished neglect amelioration after PA, possibly because stimulation affected the sensorimotor network controlling prism adaptation. Instead, a-tDCS PPC boosted neglect amelioration after PAprobably thanks to increased excitability of residual tissue in the lesioned hemisphere, which in turn might reduce dysfunctional over-excitability of the intact hemisphere.",
keywords = "Neglect, Prism Adaptation, tDCS",
author = "Elisabetta L{\`a}davas and Sara Giulietti and Alessio Avenanti and Caterina Bertini and Eleonora Lorenzini and Cristina Quinquinio and Andrea Serino",
year = "2015",
month = "10",
day = "5",
doi = "10.3233/RNN-140464",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "647--662",
journal = "Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience",
issn = "0922-6028",
publisher = "IOS Press",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A-tDCS on the ipsilesional parietal cortex boosts the effects of prism adaptation treatment in neglect

AU - Làdavas, Elisabetta

AU - Giulietti, Sara

AU - Avenanti, Alessio

AU - Bertini, Caterina

AU - Lorenzini, Eleonora

AU - Quinquinio, Cristina

AU - Serino, Andrea

PY - 2015/10/5

Y1 - 2015/10/5

N2 - Background and objective: The aim of the study is to compare the effects of multiple sessions of cathodal (c-tDCS) or anodal tDCS (a-tDCS) in modulating the beneficial effects of prism adaptation (PA) treatment in neglect patients. Methods: 30 neglect patients were submitted to 10 daily sessions of PA treatment. Patients were pseudo-randomly divided into 3 groups. In the c-tDCS-group, each PA session was coupled with 20 minutes of cathodal stimulation of the left, intact PPC; in the a-tDCS-group, anodal stimulation was applied to PPC of the damaged hemisphere; in the Sham group, sham stimulation was applied. Neglect was evaluated before and after treatment with the Behavioral Inattention Test. Results: Combined tDCS-PA treatment induced stronger neglect improvement in the a-tDCS group as compared to the Sham group. No improvement was found in the c-tDCSgroup, with respect to that normally induced by PA and found in the Sham group. Conclusions: c-tDCS abolished neglect amelioration after PA, possibly because stimulation affected the sensorimotor network controlling prism adaptation. Instead, a-tDCS PPC boosted neglect amelioration after PAprobably thanks to increased excitability of residual tissue in the lesioned hemisphere, which in turn might reduce dysfunctional over-excitability of the intact hemisphere.

AB - Background and objective: The aim of the study is to compare the effects of multiple sessions of cathodal (c-tDCS) or anodal tDCS (a-tDCS) in modulating the beneficial effects of prism adaptation (PA) treatment in neglect patients. Methods: 30 neglect patients were submitted to 10 daily sessions of PA treatment. Patients were pseudo-randomly divided into 3 groups. In the c-tDCS-group, each PA session was coupled with 20 minutes of cathodal stimulation of the left, intact PPC; in the a-tDCS-group, anodal stimulation was applied to PPC of the damaged hemisphere; in the Sham group, sham stimulation was applied. Neglect was evaluated before and after treatment with the Behavioral Inattention Test. Results: Combined tDCS-PA treatment induced stronger neglect improvement in the a-tDCS group as compared to the Sham group. No improvement was found in the c-tDCSgroup, with respect to that normally induced by PA and found in the Sham group. Conclusions: c-tDCS abolished neglect amelioration after PA, possibly because stimulation affected the sensorimotor network controlling prism adaptation. Instead, a-tDCS PPC boosted neglect amelioration after PAprobably thanks to increased excitability of residual tissue in the lesioned hemisphere, which in turn might reduce dysfunctional over-excitability of the intact hemisphere.

KW - Neglect

KW - Prism Adaptation

KW - tDCS

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84943803325&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84943803325&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3233/RNN-140464

DO - 10.3233/RNN-140464

M3 - Article

C2 - 25855132

AN - SCOPUS:84943803325

VL - 33

SP - 647

EP - 662

JO - Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience

JF - Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience

SN - 0922-6028

IS - 5

ER -