Accidental removal of devices in intensive care unit: An eight-year observational study

Alessandro Galazzi, Ileana Adamini, Dario Consonni, Paola Roselli, Daniela Rancati, Gianluca Ghilardi, Giovanni Greco, Gianluca Salinaro, Dario Laquintana

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: In the intensive care unit, invasive devices can be accidentally removed by the patient or by the operators, increasing workload, staff stress level and hospitalisation costs. Objective: to know the incidence of accidental removal of devices in critical patients, to identify their cause, when they occur and if they are repositioned. Methods: Retrospective observational study carried out in an academic, tertiary-level critical care department composed of three intensive care units. All adult patients recovered between 2011 and 2018 were enrolled. We calculated rates per 1000 device-years. Results: In the study period 10514 patients (194372 device-days) were admitted to the intensive care units and the number of reported accidental removal of devices was 451, corresponding to a rate of 2.3 episodes per 1000 device-days (95% confidence interval: 2.1–2-5). The overall rates of accidental removals were as follows: gastric tubes 10.2 (n = 270), intracranial devices 3.9 (n = 9), endotracheal tubes 2.4 (n = 27), central venous catheters and arterial catheters 1.5 (n = 92), peripheral intravenous catheters 1.2 (n = 25), surgical drains 0.5 (n = 15), urinary catheters 0.4 (n = 11), Extra Corporeal Membrane Oxygenation cannulas 0.4 (n = 1), tracheostomy cannulas 0.1 (n = 1). Conclusion: Compared to the literature, this study shows fewer incidents of accidental removal of devices. The number of accidental removals could be an indicator of the quality and safety of the care.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)34-38
JournalIntensive and Critical Care Nursing
Volume54
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Device Removal
Observational Studies
Intensive Care Units
Equipment and Supplies
Catheters
Urinary Catheters
Central Venous Catheters
Quality of Health Care
Tracheostomy
Critical Care
Workload
Stomach
Hospitalization
Retrospective Studies
Confidence Intervals
Safety
Costs and Cost Analysis
Membranes
Incidence

Keywords

  • Adverse events
  • Central venous catheter
  • Nonvascular catheter
  • Physical restraint
  • Quality of care
  • Unplanned extubation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Critical Care

Cite this

Accidental removal of devices in intensive care unit : An eight-year observational study. / Galazzi, Alessandro; Adamini, Ileana; Consonni, Dario; Roselli, Paola; Rancati, Daniela; Ghilardi, Gianluca; Greco, Giovanni; Salinaro, Gianluca; Laquintana, Dario.

In: Intensive and Critical Care Nursing, Vol. 54, 01.01.2019, p. 34-38.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Galazzi, Alessandro ; Adamini, Ileana ; Consonni, Dario ; Roselli, Paola ; Rancati, Daniela ; Ghilardi, Gianluca ; Greco, Giovanni ; Salinaro, Gianluca ; Laquintana, Dario. / Accidental removal of devices in intensive care unit : An eight-year observational study. In: Intensive and Critical Care Nursing. 2019 ; Vol. 54. pp. 34-38.
@article{be0b0ca3264f43e39154d32bc5aca385,
title = "Accidental removal of devices in intensive care unit: An eight-year observational study",
abstract = "Background: In the intensive care unit, invasive devices can be accidentally removed by the patient or by the operators, increasing workload, staff stress level and hospitalisation costs. Objective: to know the incidence of accidental removal of devices in critical patients, to identify their cause, when they occur and if they are repositioned. Methods: Retrospective observational study carried out in an academic, tertiary-level critical care department composed of three intensive care units. All adult patients recovered between 2011 and 2018 were enrolled. We calculated rates per 1000 device-years. Results: In the study period 10514 patients (194372 device-days) were admitted to the intensive care units and the number of reported accidental removal of devices was 451, corresponding to a rate of 2.3 episodes per 1000 device-days (95{\%} confidence interval: 2.1–2-5). The overall rates of accidental removals were as follows: gastric tubes 10.2 (n = 270), intracranial devices 3.9 (n = 9), endotracheal tubes 2.4 (n = 27), central venous catheters and arterial catheters 1.5 (n = 92), peripheral intravenous catheters 1.2 (n = 25), surgical drains 0.5 (n = 15), urinary catheters 0.4 (n = 11), Extra Corporeal Membrane Oxygenation cannulas 0.4 (n = 1), tracheostomy cannulas 0.1 (n = 1). Conclusion: Compared to the literature, this study shows fewer incidents of accidental removal of devices. The number of accidental removals could be an indicator of the quality and safety of the care.",
keywords = "Adverse events, Central venous catheter, Nonvascular catheter, Physical restraint, Quality of care, Unplanned extubation",
author = "Alessandro Galazzi and Ileana Adamini and Dario Consonni and Paola Roselli and Daniela Rancati and Gianluca Ghilardi and Giovanni Greco and Gianluca Salinaro and Dario Laquintana",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.iccn.2019.06.002",
language = "English",
volume = "54",
pages = "34--38",
journal = "Intensive and Critical Care Nursing",
issn = "0964-3397",
publisher = "Churchill Livingstone",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Accidental removal of devices in intensive care unit

T2 - An eight-year observational study

AU - Galazzi, Alessandro

AU - Adamini, Ileana

AU - Consonni, Dario

AU - Roselli, Paola

AU - Rancati, Daniela

AU - Ghilardi, Gianluca

AU - Greco, Giovanni

AU - Salinaro, Gianluca

AU - Laquintana, Dario

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Background: In the intensive care unit, invasive devices can be accidentally removed by the patient or by the operators, increasing workload, staff stress level and hospitalisation costs. Objective: to know the incidence of accidental removal of devices in critical patients, to identify their cause, when they occur and if they are repositioned. Methods: Retrospective observational study carried out in an academic, tertiary-level critical care department composed of three intensive care units. All adult patients recovered between 2011 and 2018 were enrolled. We calculated rates per 1000 device-years. Results: In the study period 10514 patients (194372 device-days) were admitted to the intensive care units and the number of reported accidental removal of devices was 451, corresponding to a rate of 2.3 episodes per 1000 device-days (95% confidence interval: 2.1–2-5). The overall rates of accidental removals were as follows: gastric tubes 10.2 (n = 270), intracranial devices 3.9 (n = 9), endotracheal tubes 2.4 (n = 27), central venous catheters and arterial catheters 1.5 (n = 92), peripheral intravenous catheters 1.2 (n = 25), surgical drains 0.5 (n = 15), urinary catheters 0.4 (n = 11), Extra Corporeal Membrane Oxygenation cannulas 0.4 (n = 1), tracheostomy cannulas 0.1 (n = 1). Conclusion: Compared to the literature, this study shows fewer incidents of accidental removal of devices. The number of accidental removals could be an indicator of the quality and safety of the care.

AB - Background: In the intensive care unit, invasive devices can be accidentally removed by the patient or by the operators, increasing workload, staff stress level and hospitalisation costs. Objective: to know the incidence of accidental removal of devices in critical patients, to identify their cause, when they occur and if they are repositioned. Methods: Retrospective observational study carried out in an academic, tertiary-level critical care department composed of three intensive care units. All adult patients recovered between 2011 and 2018 were enrolled. We calculated rates per 1000 device-years. Results: In the study period 10514 patients (194372 device-days) were admitted to the intensive care units and the number of reported accidental removal of devices was 451, corresponding to a rate of 2.3 episodes per 1000 device-days (95% confidence interval: 2.1–2-5). The overall rates of accidental removals were as follows: gastric tubes 10.2 (n = 270), intracranial devices 3.9 (n = 9), endotracheal tubes 2.4 (n = 27), central venous catheters and arterial catheters 1.5 (n = 92), peripheral intravenous catheters 1.2 (n = 25), surgical drains 0.5 (n = 15), urinary catheters 0.4 (n = 11), Extra Corporeal Membrane Oxygenation cannulas 0.4 (n = 1), tracheostomy cannulas 0.1 (n = 1). Conclusion: Compared to the literature, this study shows fewer incidents of accidental removal of devices. The number of accidental removals could be an indicator of the quality and safety of the care.

KW - Adverse events

KW - Central venous catheter

KW - Nonvascular catheter

KW - Physical restraint

KW - Quality of care

KW - Unplanned extubation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85067493705&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85067493705&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.iccn.2019.06.002

DO - 10.1016/j.iccn.2019.06.002

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85067493705

VL - 54

SP - 34

EP - 38

JO - Intensive and Critical Care Nursing

JF - Intensive and Critical Care Nursing

SN - 0964-3397

ER -