Accreditation for excellence of cancer research institutes: Recommendations from the Italian Network of Comprehensive Cancer Centers

Pietro Luigi Deriu, Leonardo La Pietra, Marco Pierotti, Raffaele Collazzo, Angelo Paradiso, Filippo Belardelli, Paolo De Paoli, Aldo Nigro, Rosanna Lacalamita, Manlio Ferrarini, Piergiuseppe Pelicci, Anna Roli, Gennaro Ciliberto, Stefania Scala, Alberto Amadori, Daniela Chiusole, Pellegrino Musto, Vincenzo Fusco, Giovanni Storto, Ruggero De MariaStefano Canitano, Giovanni Apolone, Maria Ravelli, Elisa Mazzini, Dino Amadori, Marna Bernabini, Valentina Ancarani, Claudio Lombardo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

A panel of experts from Italian Comprehensive Cancer Centers defines the recommendations for external quality control programs aimed to accreditation to excellence of these institutes. After definition of the process as a systematic, periodic evaluation performed by an external agency to verify whether a health organization possesses certain prerequisites regarding structural, organizational and operational conditions that are thought to affect health care quality, the panel reviews models internationally available and makes final recommendations on aspects considered of main interest. This position paper has been produced within a special project of the Ministry of Health of the Italian Government aimed to accredit, according to OECI model, 11 Italian cancer centers in the period 2012-2014. The Project represents the effort undertaken by this network of Comprehensive Cancer Centers to find a common denominator for the experience of all Institutes in external quality control programs. Fourteen shared "statements" are put forth, designed to offer some indications on the main aspects of this subject, based on literature evidence or expert opinions. They deal with the need for "accountability" and involvement of the entire organization, the effectiveness of self-evaluation, the temporal continuity and the educational value of the experience, the use of indicators and measurement tools, additionally for intra- and inter-organization comparison, the system of evaluation models used, the provision for specific requisites for oncology, and the opportunity for mutual exchange of evaluation experiences. Copyright - Il Pensiero Scientifico Editore.

Original languageEnglish
JournalTumori
Volume99
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2013

Fingerprint

Accreditation
Organizations
Quality Control
Neoplasms
Diagnostic Self Evaluation
Quality of Health Care
Social Responsibility
Health
Expert Testimony

Keywords

  • Accreditation
  • Cancer institute
  • Quality improvement
  • Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cancer Research
  • Oncology

Cite this

Accreditation for excellence of cancer research institutes : Recommendations from the Italian Network of Comprehensive Cancer Centers. / Deriu, Pietro Luigi; La Pietra, Leonardo; Pierotti, Marco; Collazzo, Raffaele; Paradiso, Angelo; Belardelli, Filippo; De Paoli, Paolo; Nigro, Aldo; Lacalamita, Rosanna; Ferrarini, Manlio; Pelicci, Piergiuseppe; Roli, Anna; Ciliberto, Gennaro; Scala, Stefania; Amadori, Alberto; Chiusole, Daniela; Musto, Pellegrino; Fusco, Vincenzo; Storto, Giovanni; De Maria, Ruggero; Canitano, Stefano; Apolone, Giovanni; Ravelli, Maria; Mazzini, Elisa; Amadori, Dino; Bernabini, Marna; Ancarani, Valentina; Lombardo, Claudio.

In: Tumori, Vol. 99, No. 6, 11.2013.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Deriu, PL, La Pietra, L, Pierotti, M, Collazzo, R, Paradiso, A, Belardelli, F, De Paoli, P, Nigro, A, Lacalamita, R, Ferrarini, M, Pelicci, P, Roli, A, Ciliberto, G, Scala, S, Amadori, A, Chiusole, D, Musto, P, Fusco, V, Storto, G, De Maria, R, Canitano, S, Apolone, G, Ravelli, M, Mazzini, E, Amadori, D, Bernabini, M, Ancarani, V & Lombardo, C 2013, 'Accreditation for excellence of cancer research institutes: Recommendations from the Italian Network of Comprehensive Cancer Centers', Tumori, vol. 99, no. 6. https://doi.org/10.1700/1390.15472
Deriu, Pietro Luigi ; La Pietra, Leonardo ; Pierotti, Marco ; Collazzo, Raffaele ; Paradiso, Angelo ; Belardelli, Filippo ; De Paoli, Paolo ; Nigro, Aldo ; Lacalamita, Rosanna ; Ferrarini, Manlio ; Pelicci, Piergiuseppe ; Roli, Anna ; Ciliberto, Gennaro ; Scala, Stefania ; Amadori, Alberto ; Chiusole, Daniela ; Musto, Pellegrino ; Fusco, Vincenzo ; Storto, Giovanni ; De Maria, Ruggero ; Canitano, Stefano ; Apolone, Giovanni ; Ravelli, Maria ; Mazzini, Elisa ; Amadori, Dino ; Bernabini, Marna ; Ancarani, Valentina ; Lombardo, Claudio. / Accreditation for excellence of cancer research institutes : Recommendations from the Italian Network of Comprehensive Cancer Centers. In: Tumori. 2013 ; Vol. 99, No. 6.
@article{868e38b7b7d547f48ec2ee6cc6226896,
title = "Accreditation for excellence of cancer research institutes: Recommendations from the Italian Network of Comprehensive Cancer Centers",
abstract = "A panel of experts from Italian Comprehensive Cancer Centers defines the recommendations for external quality control programs aimed to accreditation to excellence of these institutes. After definition of the process as a systematic, periodic evaluation performed by an external agency to verify whether a health organization possesses certain prerequisites regarding structural, organizational and operational conditions that are thought to affect health care quality, the panel reviews models internationally available and makes final recommendations on aspects considered of main interest. This position paper has been produced within a special project of the Ministry of Health of the Italian Government aimed to accredit, according to OECI model, 11 Italian cancer centers in the period 2012-2014. The Project represents the effort undertaken by this network of Comprehensive Cancer Centers to find a common denominator for the experience of all Institutes in external quality control programs. Fourteen shared {"}statements{"} are put forth, designed to offer some indications on the main aspects of this subject, based on literature evidence or expert opinions. They deal with the need for {"}accountability{"} and involvement of the entire organization, the effectiveness of self-evaluation, the temporal continuity and the educational value of the experience, the use of indicators and measurement tools, additionally for intra- and inter-organization comparison, the system of evaluation models used, the provision for specific requisites for oncology, and the opportunity for mutual exchange of evaluation experiences. Copyright - Il Pensiero Scientifico Editore.",
keywords = "Accreditation, Cancer institute, Quality improvement, Research",
author = "Deriu, {Pietro Luigi} and {La Pietra}, Leonardo and Marco Pierotti and Raffaele Collazzo and Angelo Paradiso and Filippo Belardelli and {De Paoli}, Paolo and Aldo Nigro and Rosanna Lacalamita and Manlio Ferrarini and Piergiuseppe Pelicci and Anna Roli and Gennaro Ciliberto and Stefania Scala and Alberto Amadori and Daniela Chiusole and Pellegrino Musto and Vincenzo Fusco and Giovanni Storto and {De Maria}, Ruggero and Stefano Canitano and Giovanni Apolone and Maria Ravelli and Elisa Mazzini and Dino Amadori and Marna Bernabini and Valentina Ancarani and Claudio Lombardo",
year = "2013",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1700/1390.15472",
language = "English",
volume = "99",
journal = "Tumori",
issn = "0300-8916",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Accreditation for excellence of cancer research institutes

T2 - Recommendations from the Italian Network of Comprehensive Cancer Centers

AU - Deriu, Pietro Luigi

AU - La Pietra, Leonardo

AU - Pierotti, Marco

AU - Collazzo, Raffaele

AU - Paradiso, Angelo

AU - Belardelli, Filippo

AU - De Paoli, Paolo

AU - Nigro, Aldo

AU - Lacalamita, Rosanna

AU - Ferrarini, Manlio

AU - Pelicci, Piergiuseppe

AU - Roli, Anna

AU - Ciliberto, Gennaro

AU - Scala, Stefania

AU - Amadori, Alberto

AU - Chiusole, Daniela

AU - Musto, Pellegrino

AU - Fusco, Vincenzo

AU - Storto, Giovanni

AU - De Maria, Ruggero

AU - Canitano, Stefano

AU - Apolone, Giovanni

AU - Ravelli, Maria

AU - Mazzini, Elisa

AU - Amadori, Dino

AU - Bernabini, Marna

AU - Ancarani, Valentina

AU - Lombardo, Claudio

PY - 2013/11

Y1 - 2013/11

N2 - A panel of experts from Italian Comprehensive Cancer Centers defines the recommendations for external quality control programs aimed to accreditation to excellence of these institutes. After definition of the process as a systematic, periodic evaluation performed by an external agency to verify whether a health organization possesses certain prerequisites regarding structural, organizational and operational conditions that are thought to affect health care quality, the panel reviews models internationally available and makes final recommendations on aspects considered of main interest. This position paper has been produced within a special project of the Ministry of Health of the Italian Government aimed to accredit, according to OECI model, 11 Italian cancer centers in the period 2012-2014. The Project represents the effort undertaken by this network of Comprehensive Cancer Centers to find a common denominator for the experience of all Institutes in external quality control programs. Fourteen shared "statements" are put forth, designed to offer some indications on the main aspects of this subject, based on literature evidence or expert opinions. They deal with the need for "accountability" and involvement of the entire organization, the effectiveness of self-evaluation, the temporal continuity and the educational value of the experience, the use of indicators and measurement tools, additionally for intra- and inter-organization comparison, the system of evaluation models used, the provision for specific requisites for oncology, and the opportunity for mutual exchange of evaluation experiences. Copyright - Il Pensiero Scientifico Editore.

AB - A panel of experts from Italian Comprehensive Cancer Centers defines the recommendations for external quality control programs aimed to accreditation to excellence of these institutes. After definition of the process as a systematic, periodic evaluation performed by an external agency to verify whether a health organization possesses certain prerequisites regarding structural, organizational and operational conditions that are thought to affect health care quality, the panel reviews models internationally available and makes final recommendations on aspects considered of main interest. This position paper has been produced within a special project of the Ministry of Health of the Italian Government aimed to accredit, according to OECI model, 11 Italian cancer centers in the period 2012-2014. The Project represents the effort undertaken by this network of Comprehensive Cancer Centers to find a common denominator for the experience of all Institutes in external quality control programs. Fourteen shared "statements" are put forth, designed to offer some indications on the main aspects of this subject, based on literature evidence or expert opinions. They deal with the need for "accountability" and involvement of the entire organization, the effectiveness of self-evaluation, the temporal continuity and the educational value of the experience, the use of indicators and measurement tools, additionally for intra- and inter-organization comparison, the system of evaluation models used, the provision for specific requisites for oncology, and the opportunity for mutual exchange of evaluation experiences. Copyright - Il Pensiero Scientifico Editore.

KW - Accreditation

KW - Cancer institute

KW - Quality improvement

KW - Research

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84894237472&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84894237472&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1700/1390.15472

DO - 10.1700/1390.15472

M3 - Article

C2 - 24503807

AN - SCOPUS:84894237472

VL - 99

JO - Tumori

JF - Tumori

SN - 0300-8916

IS - 6

ER -