Accuracy of calculated serum low-density lipoprotein cholesterol for the assessment of coronary heart disease risk in NIDDM patients

Adriana Branchi, Angelo Rovellini, Adriana Torri, Domenico Sommariva

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

OBJECTIVE - To evaluate the accuracy of LDL cholesterol calculated with Friedewald's equation in the assessment of cardiovascular risk in NIDDM patients. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - The calculation of LDL cholesterol according to Friedewald's formula was compared with the measurement of LDL cholesterol separated by ultracentrifugation in 151 NIDDM patients with fairly good metabolic control (HbA(1c) ≤10%) and in 405 nondiabetic subjects. RESULTS - Measured and calculated LDL cholesterol was found to be well correlated in both diabetic (r = 0.95) and nondiabetic (r = 0.97) subjects. Compared with measured LDL cholesterol, the calculated LDL cholesterol differed by ≤ 10% in 34% of samples from diabetic patients and in 26% of samples from nondiabetic subjects (χ2 = 3.885, P <0.05). The percentage of error increased when the serum triglyceride (TG) level was ≤200 mg/dl (2.26 mmol/l) and when the ratio of VLDL cholesterol to TG was 0.29 in both groups of subjects. Although the percentage of error from calculated LDL cholesterol was greater in diabetic than in nondiabetic subjects because of the greater prevalence of hypertrigtyceridemia in the former group, the misclassification of coronary heart disease risk, according to the cutoff points of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP), was similar in the two groups (25% in diabetic and 22% in nondiabetic subjects). In both groups of patients, the misclassification of coronary heart disease risk was higher when calculation of LDL cholesterol produced values near the cutoff points. CONCLUSIONS - Although accuracy in the estimation of LDL cholesterol is less than ideal, Friedewald's equation seems to be of value in the correct assignment of coronary heart disease risk classes in the great majority of diabetic as well as nondiabetic subjects. Caution must be exercised for subjects in whom calculated LDL cholesterol is close to the cut off points of the NCEP guidelines.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1397-1402
Number of pages6
JournalDiabetes Care
Volume21
Issue number9
Publication statusPublished - 1998

Fingerprint

LDL Cholesterol
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Coronary Disease
Serum
Triglycerides
Cholesterol
Education
VLDL Cholesterol
Ultracentrifugation
Research Design
Guidelines

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
  • Internal Medicine

Cite this

Accuracy of calculated serum low-density lipoprotein cholesterol for the assessment of coronary heart disease risk in NIDDM patients. / Branchi, Adriana; Rovellini, Angelo; Torri, Adriana; Sommariva, Domenico.

In: Diabetes Care, Vol. 21, No. 9, 1998, p. 1397-1402.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{92cf5f1d98a94afea9b81130edecd8f7,
title = "Accuracy of calculated serum low-density lipoprotein cholesterol for the assessment of coronary heart disease risk in NIDDM patients",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE - To evaluate the accuracy of LDL cholesterol calculated with Friedewald's equation in the assessment of cardiovascular risk in NIDDM patients. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - The calculation of LDL cholesterol according to Friedewald's formula was compared with the measurement of LDL cholesterol separated by ultracentrifugation in 151 NIDDM patients with fairly good metabolic control (HbA(1c) ≤10{\%}) and in 405 nondiabetic subjects. RESULTS - Measured and calculated LDL cholesterol was found to be well correlated in both diabetic (r = 0.95) and nondiabetic (r = 0.97) subjects. Compared with measured LDL cholesterol, the calculated LDL cholesterol differed by ≤ 10{\%} in 34{\%} of samples from diabetic patients and in 26{\%} of samples from nondiabetic subjects (χ2 = 3.885, P <0.05). The percentage of error increased when the serum triglyceride (TG) level was ≤200 mg/dl (2.26 mmol/l) and when the ratio of VLDL cholesterol to TG was 0.29 in both groups of subjects. Although the percentage of error from calculated LDL cholesterol was greater in diabetic than in nondiabetic subjects because of the greater prevalence of hypertrigtyceridemia in the former group, the misclassification of coronary heart disease risk, according to the cutoff points of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP), was similar in the two groups (25{\%} in diabetic and 22{\%} in nondiabetic subjects). In both groups of patients, the misclassification of coronary heart disease risk was higher when calculation of LDL cholesterol produced values near the cutoff points. CONCLUSIONS - Although accuracy in the estimation of LDL cholesterol is less than ideal, Friedewald's equation seems to be of value in the correct assignment of coronary heart disease risk classes in the great majority of diabetic as well as nondiabetic subjects. Caution must be exercised for subjects in whom calculated LDL cholesterol is close to the cut off points of the NCEP guidelines.",
author = "Adriana Branchi and Angelo Rovellini and Adriana Torri and Domenico Sommariva",
year = "1998",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "1397--1402",
journal = "Diabetes Care",
issn = "1935-5548",
publisher = "American Diabetes Association Inc.",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Accuracy of calculated serum low-density lipoprotein cholesterol for the assessment of coronary heart disease risk in NIDDM patients

AU - Branchi, Adriana

AU - Rovellini, Angelo

AU - Torri, Adriana

AU - Sommariva, Domenico

PY - 1998

Y1 - 1998

N2 - OBJECTIVE - To evaluate the accuracy of LDL cholesterol calculated with Friedewald's equation in the assessment of cardiovascular risk in NIDDM patients. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - The calculation of LDL cholesterol according to Friedewald's formula was compared with the measurement of LDL cholesterol separated by ultracentrifugation in 151 NIDDM patients with fairly good metabolic control (HbA(1c) ≤10%) and in 405 nondiabetic subjects. RESULTS - Measured and calculated LDL cholesterol was found to be well correlated in both diabetic (r = 0.95) and nondiabetic (r = 0.97) subjects. Compared with measured LDL cholesterol, the calculated LDL cholesterol differed by ≤ 10% in 34% of samples from diabetic patients and in 26% of samples from nondiabetic subjects (χ2 = 3.885, P <0.05). The percentage of error increased when the serum triglyceride (TG) level was ≤200 mg/dl (2.26 mmol/l) and when the ratio of VLDL cholesterol to TG was 0.29 in both groups of subjects. Although the percentage of error from calculated LDL cholesterol was greater in diabetic than in nondiabetic subjects because of the greater prevalence of hypertrigtyceridemia in the former group, the misclassification of coronary heart disease risk, according to the cutoff points of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP), was similar in the two groups (25% in diabetic and 22% in nondiabetic subjects). In both groups of patients, the misclassification of coronary heart disease risk was higher when calculation of LDL cholesterol produced values near the cutoff points. CONCLUSIONS - Although accuracy in the estimation of LDL cholesterol is less than ideal, Friedewald's equation seems to be of value in the correct assignment of coronary heart disease risk classes in the great majority of diabetic as well as nondiabetic subjects. Caution must be exercised for subjects in whom calculated LDL cholesterol is close to the cut off points of the NCEP guidelines.

AB - OBJECTIVE - To evaluate the accuracy of LDL cholesterol calculated with Friedewald's equation in the assessment of cardiovascular risk in NIDDM patients. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - The calculation of LDL cholesterol according to Friedewald's formula was compared with the measurement of LDL cholesterol separated by ultracentrifugation in 151 NIDDM patients with fairly good metabolic control (HbA(1c) ≤10%) and in 405 nondiabetic subjects. RESULTS - Measured and calculated LDL cholesterol was found to be well correlated in both diabetic (r = 0.95) and nondiabetic (r = 0.97) subjects. Compared with measured LDL cholesterol, the calculated LDL cholesterol differed by ≤ 10% in 34% of samples from diabetic patients and in 26% of samples from nondiabetic subjects (χ2 = 3.885, P <0.05). The percentage of error increased when the serum triglyceride (TG) level was ≤200 mg/dl (2.26 mmol/l) and when the ratio of VLDL cholesterol to TG was 0.29 in both groups of subjects. Although the percentage of error from calculated LDL cholesterol was greater in diabetic than in nondiabetic subjects because of the greater prevalence of hypertrigtyceridemia in the former group, the misclassification of coronary heart disease risk, according to the cutoff points of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP), was similar in the two groups (25% in diabetic and 22% in nondiabetic subjects). In both groups of patients, the misclassification of coronary heart disease risk was higher when calculation of LDL cholesterol produced values near the cutoff points. CONCLUSIONS - Although accuracy in the estimation of LDL cholesterol is less than ideal, Friedewald's equation seems to be of value in the correct assignment of coronary heart disease risk classes in the great majority of diabetic as well as nondiabetic subjects. Caution must be exercised for subjects in whom calculated LDL cholesterol is close to the cut off points of the NCEP guidelines.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=3543001022&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=3543001022&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 9727883

AN - SCOPUS:3543001022

VL - 21

SP - 1397

EP - 1402

JO - Diabetes Care

JF - Diabetes Care

SN - 1935-5548

IS - 9

ER -