ACI and MACI.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Regenerative procedures aim to recreate a hyaline-like tissue, thus restoring a biologically and biomechanically valid articular surface with durable clinical results. Autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) has been developed two decades ago, and both the production of a hyaline-like articular surface and a satisfactory clinical outcome have been documented at medium-long follow-up. Bioengineering technology further improved this regenerative treatment approach to include matrix-assisted ACI (MACI) techniques. These procedures have been introduced in the clinical practice one decade ago, showing similar results while at the same time overcoming most of the concerns related to the first-generation ACI. The use of scaffolds to create a cartilage-like tissue in a three-dimensional culture system allows for the optimization of the procedure from both the biological and surgical point of view. However, despite thousands of treated patients and many published studies suggesting good clinical results and durability of these procedures, the properties of healthy, normal articular cartilage are still unmatched by any available substitute. Both indications and results of these substitutes are still controversial. The role of many variables that may influence the final outcome still need to be clarified to further improve the potential benefits of these biological regenerative procedures.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)17-22
Number of pages6
JournalThe journal of knee surgery
Volume25
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2012

Fingerprint

Chondrocytes
Hyalin
Joints
Bioengineering
Articular Cartilage
Cartilage
Technology
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

ACI and MACI. / Kon, Elizaveta; Filardo, Giuseppe; Di Martino, Alessandro; Marcacci, Maurilio.

In: The journal of knee surgery, Vol. 25, No. 1, 03.2012, p. 17-22.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{23e6893a253e46cc87b55e7da29bd2b2,
title = "ACI and MACI.",
abstract = "Regenerative procedures aim to recreate a hyaline-like tissue, thus restoring a biologically and biomechanically valid articular surface with durable clinical results. Autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) has been developed two decades ago, and both the production of a hyaline-like articular surface and a satisfactory clinical outcome have been documented at medium-long follow-up. Bioengineering technology further improved this regenerative treatment approach to include matrix-assisted ACI (MACI) techniques. These procedures have been introduced in the clinical practice one decade ago, showing similar results while at the same time overcoming most of the concerns related to the first-generation ACI. The use of scaffolds to create a cartilage-like tissue in a three-dimensional culture system allows for the optimization of the procedure from both the biological and surgical point of view. However, despite thousands of treated patients and many published studies suggesting good clinical results and durability of these procedures, the properties of healthy, normal articular cartilage are still unmatched by any available substitute. Both indications and results of these substitutes are still controversial. The role of many variables that may influence the final outcome still need to be clarified to further improve the potential benefits of these biological regenerative procedures.",
author = "Elizaveta Kon and Giuseppe Filardo and {Di Martino}, Alessandro and Maurilio Marcacci",
year = "2012",
month = "3",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "17--22",
journal = "Journal of Knee Surgery",
issn = "1538-8506",
publisher = "Thieme Medical Publishers",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - ACI and MACI.

AU - Kon, Elizaveta

AU - Filardo, Giuseppe

AU - Di Martino, Alessandro

AU - Marcacci, Maurilio

PY - 2012/3

Y1 - 2012/3

N2 - Regenerative procedures aim to recreate a hyaline-like tissue, thus restoring a biologically and biomechanically valid articular surface with durable clinical results. Autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) has been developed two decades ago, and both the production of a hyaline-like articular surface and a satisfactory clinical outcome have been documented at medium-long follow-up. Bioengineering technology further improved this regenerative treatment approach to include matrix-assisted ACI (MACI) techniques. These procedures have been introduced in the clinical practice one decade ago, showing similar results while at the same time overcoming most of the concerns related to the first-generation ACI. The use of scaffolds to create a cartilage-like tissue in a three-dimensional culture system allows for the optimization of the procedure from both the biological and surgical point of view. However, despite thousands of treated patients and many published studies suggesting good clinical results and durability of these procedures, the properties of healthy, normal articular cartilage are still unmatched by any available substitute. Both indications and results of these substitutes are still controversial. The role of many variables that may influence the final outcome still need to be clarified to further improve the potential benefits of these biological regenerative procedures.

AB - Regenerative procedures aim to recreate a hyaline-like tissue, thus restoring a biologically and biomechanically valid articular surface with durable clinical results. Autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) has been developed two decades ago, and both the production of a hyaline-like articular surface and a satisfactory clinical outcome have been documented at medium-long follow-up. Bioengineering technology further improved this regenerative treatment approach to include matrix-assisted ACI (MACI) techniques. These procedures have been introduced in the clinical practice one decade ago, showing similar results while at the same time overcoming most of the concerns related to the first-generation ACI. The use of scaffolds to create a cartilage-like tissue in a three-dimensional culture system allows for the optimization of the procedure from both the biological and surgical point of view. However, despite thousands of treated patients and many published studies suggesting good clinical results and durability of these procedures, the properties of healthy, normal articular cartilage are still unmatched by any available substitute. Both indications and results of these substitutes are still controversial. The role of many variables that may influence the final outcome still need to be clarified to further improve the potential benefits of these biological regenerative procedures.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84862255910&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84862255910&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 22624243

AN - SCOPUS:84862255910

VL - 25

SP - 17

EP - 22

JO - Journal of Knee Surgery

JF - Journal of Knee Surgery

SN - 1538-8506

IS - 1

ER -