ACL reconstruction combined with lateral monoloop tenodesis can restore intact knee laxity

Koen C. Lagae, Joris Robberecht, Kiron K. Athwal, Peter C.M. Verdonk, Andrew A. Amis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: An anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury is often combined with injury to the lateral extra-articular structures, which may cause a combined anterior and rotational laxity. It was hypothesised that addition of a ‘monoloop’ lateral extra-articular tenodesis (mLET) to an ACL reconstruction would restore anteroposterior, internal rotation and pivot-shift laxities better than isolated ACL reconstruction in combined injuries. Method: Twelve cadaveric knees were tested, using an optical tracking system to record the kinematics through 0°–100° of knee flexion with no load, anterior and posterior translational forces (90 N), internal and external rotational torques (5 Nm), and a combination of an anterior translational (90 N) plus internal rotational load (5 Nm). They were tested intact, after sectioning the ACL, sectioning anterolateral ligament (ALL), iliotibial band (ITB) graft harvest, releasing deep ITB fibres, hamstrings tendon ACL reconstruction, mLET combined with ACL reconstruction, and isolated mLET. Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA compared laxity data across knee states and flexion angles. When differences were found, paired t tests with Bonferroni correction were performed. Results: In the ACL-deficient knee, cutting the ALL significantly increased anterior laxity only at 20°–30°, and only significantly increased internal rotation at 50°. Additional deep ITB release significantly increased anterior laxity at 40°–90° and caused a large increase of internal rotation at 20°–100°. Isolated ACL reconstruction restored anterior drawer, but significant differences remained in internal rotation at 30°–100°. After adding an mLET there were no remaining differences with anterior translation or internal rotation compared to the intact knee. With the combined injury, isolated mLET allowed abnormal anterior translation and rotation to persist. Conclusions: Cutting the deep fibres of the ITB caused large increases in tibial internal rotation laxity across the range of knee flexion, while cutting the ALL alone did not. With ACL deficiency combined with anterolateral deficiency, ACL reconstruction alone was insufficient to restore native knee rotational laxity. However, combining a ‘monoloop’ lateral extra-articular tenodesis with ACL reconstruction did restore native knee laxity.

Original languageEnglish
JournalKnee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2020
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Tenodesis
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Knee
Joints
Anterior Cruciate Ligament
Ligaments
Wounds and Injuries
Optical Devices
Torque
Biomechanical Phenomena
Analysis of Variance
Transplants

Keywords

  • ACL reconstruction
  • Anterolateral rotational instability
  • Biomechanics
  • Knee laxity
  • Lateral extra-articular tenodesis
  • Monoloop

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

ACL reconstruction combined with lateral monoloop tenodesis can restore intact knee laxity. / Lagae, Koen C.; Robberecht, Joris; Athwal, Kiron K.; Verdonk, Peter C.M.; Amis, Andrew A.

In: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 01.01.2020.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lagae, Koen C. ; Robberecht, Joris ; Athwal, Kiron K. ; Verdonk, Peter C.M. ; Amis, Andrew A. / ACL reconstruction combined with lateral monoloop tenodesis can restore intact knee laxity. In: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2020.
@article{d225c924f9ed4618a6e9a13b2e4f4af9,
title = "ACL reconstruction combined with lateral monoloop tenodesis can restore intact knee laxity",
abstract = "Purpose: An anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury is often combined with injury to the lateral extra-articular structures, which may cause a combined anterior and rotational laxity. It was hypothesised that addition of a ‘monoloop’ lateral extra-articular tenodesis (mLET) to an ACL reconstruction would restore anteroposterior, internal rotation and pivot-shift laxities better than isolated ACL reconstruction in combined injuries. Method: Twelve cadaveric knees were tested, using an optical tracking system to record the kinematics through 0°–100° of knee flexion with no load, anterior and posterior translational forces (90 N), internal and external rotational torques (5 Nm), and a combination of an anterior translational (90 N) plus internal rotational load (5 Nm). They were tested intact, after sectioning the ACL, sectioning anterolateral ligament (ALL), iliotibial band (ITB) graft harvest, releasing deep ITB fibres, hamstrings tendon ACL reconstruction, mLET combined with ACL reconstruction, and isolated mLET. Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA compared laxity data across knee states and flexion angles. When differences were found, paired t tests with Bonferroni correction were performed. Results: In the ACL-deficient knee, cutting the ALL significantly increased anterior laxity only at 20°–30°, and only significantly increased internal rotation at 50°. Additional deep ITB release significantly increased anterior laxity at 40°–90° and caused a large increase of internal rotation at 20°–100°. Isolated ACL reconstruction restored anterior drawer, but significant differences remained in internal rotation at 30°–100°. After adding an mLET there were no remaining differences with anterior translation or internal rotation compared to the intact knee. With the combined injury, isolated mLET allowed abnormal anterior translation and rotation to persist. Conclusions: Cutting the deep fibres of the ITB caused large increases in tibial internal rotation laxity across the range of knee flexion, while cutting the ALL alone did not. With ACL deficiency combined with anterolateral deficiency, ACL reconstruction alone was insufficient to restore native knee rotational laxity. However, combining a ‘monoloop’ lateral extra-articular tenodesis with ACL reconstruction did restore native knee laxity.",
keywords = "ACL reconstruction, Anterolateral rotational instability, Biomechanics, Knee laxity, Lateral extra-articular tenodesis, Monoloop",
author = "Lagae, {Koen C.} and Joris Robberecht and Athwal, {Kiron K.} and Verdonk, {Peter C.M.} and Amis, {Andrew A.}",
year = "2020",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s00167-019-05839-y",
language = "English",
journal = "Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy",
issn = "0942-2056",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - ACL reconstruction combined with lateral monoloop tenodesis can restore intact knee laxity

AU - Lagae, Koen C.

AU - Robberecht, Joris

AU - Athwal, Kiron K.

AU - Verdonk, Peter C.M.

AU - Amis, Andrew A.

PY - 2020/1/1

Y1 - 2020/1/1

N2 - Purpose: An anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury is often combined with injury to the lateral extra-articular structures, which may cause a combined anterior and rotational laxity. It was hypothesised that addition of a ‘monoloop’ lateral extra-articular tenodesis (mLET) to an ACL reconstruction would restore anteroposterior, internal rotation and pivot-shift laxities better than isolated ACL reconstruction in combined injuries. Method: Twelve cadaveric knees were tested, using an optical tracking system to record the kinematics through 0°–100° of knee flexion with no load, anterior and posterior translational forces (90 N), internal and external rotational torques (5 Nm), and a combination of an anterior translational (90 N) plus internal rotational load (5 Nm). They were tested intact, after sectioning the ACL, sectioning anterolateral ligament (ALL), iliotibial band (ITB) graft harvest, releasing deep ITB fibres, hamstrings tendon ACL reconstruction, mLET combined with ACL reconstruction, and isolated mLET. Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA compared laxity data across knee states and flexion angles. When differences were found, paired t tests with Bonferroni correction were performed. Results: In the ACL-deficient knee, cutting the ALL significantly increased anterior laxity only at 20°–30°, and only significantly increased internal rotation at 50°. Additional deep ITB release significantly increased anterior laxity at 40°–90° and caused a large increase of internal rotation at 20°–100°. Isolated ACL reconstruction restored anterior drawer, but significant differences remained in internal rotation at 30°–100°. After adding an mLET there were no remaining differences with anterior translation or internal rotation compared to the intact knee. With the combined injury, isolated mLET allowed abnormal anterior translation and rotation to persist. Conclusions: Cutting the deep fibres of the ITB caused large increases in tibial internal rotation laxity across the range of knee flexion, while cutting the ALL alone did not. With ACL deficiency combined with anterolateral deficiency, ACL reconstruction alone was insufficient to restore native knee rotational laxity. However, combining a ‘monoloop’ lateral extra-articular tenodesis with ACL reconstruction did restore native knee laxity.

AB - Purpose: An anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury is often combined with injury to the lateral extra-articular structures, which may cause a combined anterior and rotational laxity. It was hypothesised that addition of a ‘monoloop’ lateral extra-articular tenodesis (mLET) to an ACL reconstruction would restore anteroposterior, internal rotation and pivot-shift laxities better than isolated ACL reconstruction in combined injuries. Method: Twelve cadaveric knees were tested, using an optical tracking system to record the kinematics through 0°–100° of knee flexion with no load, anterior and posterior translational forces (90 N), internal and external rotational torques (5 Nm), and a combination of an anterior translational (90 N) plus internal rotational load (5 Nm). They were tested intact, after sectioning the ACL, sectioning anterolateral ligament (ALL), iliotibial band (ITB) graft harvest, releasing deep ITB fibres, hamstrings tendon ACL reconstruction, mLET combined with ACL reconstruction, and isolated mLET. Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA compared laxity data across knee states and flexion angles. When differences were found, paired t tests with Bonferroni correction were performed. Results: In the ACL-deficient knee, cutting the ALL significantly increased anterior laxity only at 20°–30°, and only significantly increased internal rotation at 50°. Additional deep ITB release significantly increased anterior laxity at 40°–90° and caused a large increase of internal rotation at 20°–100°. Isolated ACL reconstruction restored anterior drawer, but significant differences remained in internal rotation at 30°–100°. After adding an mLET there were no remaining differences with anterior translation or internal rotation compared to the intact knee. With the combined injury, isolated mLET allowed abnormal anterior translation and rotation to persist. Conclusions: Cutting the deep fibres of the ITB caused large increases in tibial internal rotation laxity across the range of knee flexion, while cutting the ALL alone did not. With ACL deficiency combined with anterolateral deficiency, ACL reconstruction alone was insufficient to restore native knee rotational laxity. However, combining a ‘monoloop’ lateral extra-articular tenodesis with ACL reconstruction did restore native knee laxity.

KW - ACL reconstruction

KW - Anterolateral rotational instability

KW - Biomechanics

KW - Knee laxity

KW - Lateral extra-articular tenodesis

KW - Monoloop

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85078189566&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85078189566&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00167-019-05839-y

DO - 10.1007/s00167-019-05839-y

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85078189566

JO - Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy

JF - Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy

SN - 0942-2056

ER -