Action observation and motor imagery in performance of complex movements: Evidence from EEG and kinematics analysis

Javier J. Gonzalez-Rosa, Fabrizio Natali, Andrea Tettamanti, Marco Cursi, Svetla Velikova, Giancarlo Comi, Roberto Gatti, Letizia Leocani

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Motor imagery (MI) and action observation (AO) are considered effective cognitive tools for motor learning, but little work directly compared their cortical activation correlate in relation with subsequent performance. We compared AO and MI in promoting early learning of a complex four-limb, hand-foot coordination task, using electroencephalographic (EEG) and kinematic analysis. Thirty healthy subjects were randomly assigned into three groups to perform a training period in which AO watched a video of the task, MI had to imagine it, and Control (C) was involved in a distracting computation task. Subjects were then asked to actually perform the motor task with kinematic measurement of error time with respect to the correct motor performance. EEG was recorded during baseline, training and task execution, with task-related power (TRPow) calculation for sensorimotor (alpha and beta) rhythms reactive with respect to rest. During training, the AO group had a stronger alpha desynchronization than the MI and C over frontocentral and bilateral parietal areas. However, during task execution, AO group had greater beta synchronization over bilateral parietal regions than MI and C groups. This beta synchrony furthermore demonstrated the strongest association with kinematic errors, which was also significantly lower in AO than in MI. These data suggest that sensorimotor activation elicited by action observation enhanced motor learning according to motor performance, corresponding to a more efficient activation of cortical resources during task execution. Action observation may be more effective than motor imagery in promoting early learning of a new complex coordination task.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)290-300
Number of pages11
JournalBehavioural Brain Research
Volume281
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 5 2015

Fingerprint

Imagery (Psychotherapy)
Biomechanical Phenomena
Observation
Learning
Beta Rhythm
Alpha Rhythm
Parietal Lobe
Coordination Complexes
Foot
Healthy Volunteers
Extremities
Hand

Keywords

  • Action observation
  • Alpha desynchronization
  • Beta synchronization
  • EEG
  • Motor imagery
  • Sensorimotor brain area

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Behavioral Neuroscience
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Action observation and motor imagery in performance of complex movements : Evidence from EEG and kinematics analysis. / Gonzalez-Rosa, Javier J.; Natali, Fabrizio; Tettamanti, Andrea; Cursi, Marco; Velikova, Svetla; Comi, Giancarlo; Gatti, Roberto; Leocani, Letizia.

In: Behavioural Brain Research, Vol. 281, 05.03.2015, p. 290-300.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gonzalez-Rosa, Javier J. ; Natali, Fabrizio ; Tettamanti, Andrea ; Cursi, Marco ; Velikova, Svetla ; Comi, Giancarlo ; Gatti, Roberto ; Leocani, Letizia. / Action observation and motor imagery in performance of complex movements : Evidence from EEG and kinematics analysis. In: Behavioural Brain Research. 2015 ; Vol. 281. pp. 290-300.
@article{ab0c3310b04b4f6ba7b56fda40066378,
title = "Action observation and motor imagery in performance of complex movements: Evidence from EEG and kinematics analysis",
abstract = "Motor imagery (MI) and action observation (AO) are considered effective cognitive tools for motor learning, but little work directly compared their cortical activation correlate in relation with subsequent performance. We compared AO and MI in promoting early learning of a complex four-limb, hand-foot coordination task, using electroencephalographic (EEG) and kinematic analysis. Thirty healthy subjects were randomly assigned into three groups to perform a training period in which AO watched a video of the task, MI had to imagine it, and Control (C) was involved in a distracting computation task. Subjects were then asked to actually perform the motor task with kinematic measurement of error time with respect to the correct motor performance. EEG was recorded during baseline, training and task execution, with task-related power (TRPow) calculation for sensorimotor (alpha and beta) rhythms reactive with respect to rest. During training, the AO group had a stronger alpha desynchronization than the MI and C over frontocentral and bilateral parietal areas. However, during task execution, AO group had greater beta synchronization over bilateral parietal regions than MI and C groups. This beta synchrony furthermore demonstrated the strongest association with kinematic errors, which was also significantly lower in AO than in MI. These data suggest that sensorimotor activation elicited by action observation enhanced motor learning according to motor performance, corresponding to a more efficient activation of cortical resources during task execution. Action observation may be more effective than motor imagery in promoting early learning of a new complex coordination task.",
keywords = "Action observation, Alpha desynchronization, Beta synchronization, EEG, Motor imagery, Sensorimotor brain area",
author = "Gonzalez-Rosa, {Javier J.} and Fabrizio Natali and Andrea Tettamanti and Marco Cursi and Svetla Velikova and Giancarlo Comi and Roberto Gatti and Letizia Leocani",
year = "2015",
month = "3",
day = "5",
doi = "10.1016/j.bbr.2014.12.016",
language = "English",
volume = "281",
pages = "290--300",
journal = "Behavioural Brain Research",
issn = "0166-4328",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Action observation and motor imagery in performance of complex movements

T2 - Evidence from EEG and kinematics analysis

AU - Gonzalez-Rosa, Javier J.

AU - Natali, Fabrizio

AU - Tettamanti, Andrea

AU - Cursi, Marco

AU - Velikova, Svetla

AU - Comi, Giancarlo

AU - Gatti, Roberto

AU - Leocani, Letizia

PY - 2015/3/5

Y1 - 2015/3/5

N2 - Motor imagery (MI) and action observation (AO) are considered effective cognitive tools for motor learning, but little work directly compared their cortical activation correlate in relation with subsequent performance. We compared AO and MI in promoting early learning of a complex four-limb, hand-foot coordination task, using electroencephalographic (EEG) and kinematic analysis. Thirty healthy subjects were randomly assigned into three groups to perform a training period in which AO watched a video of the task, MI had to imagine it, and Control (C) was involved in a distracting computation task. Subjects were then asked to actually perform the motor task with kinematic measurement of error time with respect to the correct motor performance. EEG was recorded during baseline, training and task execution, with task-related power (TRPow) calculation for sensorimotor (alpha and beta) rhythms reactive with respect to rest. During training, the AO group had a stronger alpha desynchronization than the MI and C over frontocentral and bilateral parietal areas. However, during task execution, AO group had greater beta synchronization over bilateral parietal regions than MI and C groups. This beta synchrony furthermore demonstrated the strongest association with kinematic errors, which was also significantly lower in AO than in MI. These data suggest that sensorimotor activation elicited by action observation enhanced motor learning according to motor performance, corresponding to a more efficient activation of cortical resources during task execution. Action observation may be more effective than motor imagery in promoting early learning of a new complex coordination task.

AB - Motor imagery (MI) and action observation (AO) are considered effective cognitive tools for motor learning, but little work directly compared their cortical activation correlate in relation with subsequent performance. We compared AO and MI in promoting early learning of a complex four-limb, hand-foot coordination task, using electroencephalographic (EEG) and kinematic analysis. Thirty healthy subjects were randomly assigned into three groups to perform a training period in which AO watched a video of the task, MI had to imagine it, and Control (C) was involved in a distracting computation task. Subjects were then asked to actually perform the motor task with kinematic measurement of error time with respect to the correct motor performance. EEG was recorded during baseline, training and task execution, with task-related power (TRPow) calculation for sensorimotor (alpha and beta) rhythms reactive with respect to rest. During training, the AO group had a stronger alpha desynchronization than the MI and C over frontocentral and bilateral parietal areas. However, during task execution, AO group had greater beta synchronization over bilateral parietal regions than MI and C groups. This beta synchrony furthermore demonstrated the strongest association with kinematic errors, which was also significantly lower in AO than in MI. These data suggest that sensorimotor activation elicited by action observation enhanced motor learning according to motor performance, corresponding to a more efficient activation of cortical resources during task execution. Action observation may be more effective than motor imagery in promoting early learning of a new complex coordination task.

KW - Action observation

KW - Alpha desynchronization

KW - Beta synchronization

KW - EEG

KW - Motor imagery

KW - Sensorimotor brain area

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84920277928&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84920277928&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.bbr.2014.12.016

DO - 10.1016/j.bbr.2014.12.016

M3 - Article

C2 - 25532912

AN - SCOPUS:84920277928

VL - 281

SP - 290

EP - 300

JO - Behavioural Brain Research

JF - Behavioural Brain Research

SN - 0166-4328

ER -