Action observation in infancy: Implications for neuro-rehabilitation

Valentina Burzi, Gessica Tealdi, Roslyn N. Boyd, Andrea Guzzetta

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Action observation therapy has been found to be effective in improving hand motor function in both adults with stroke and children with unilateral cerebral palsy. We here propose a provocative hypothesis arguing that the same therapy might be effective in very early intervention in infants with unilateral or asymmetric brain damage, but through a different underlying mechanism. If the activation of motor networks induced in infancy by action observation enhances the excitability of the damaged sensorimotor cortex, it could also accelerate the maturation of the corticospinal tract and the adaptive shaping of the spinal motor circuits. This hypothesis should be explored carefully in prospective studies and, if confirmed, might support the use of action observation therapy at a much earlier time than experimented so far. What this paper adds: A revision of the literature on AOT in children and adults with unilateral brain damage. The discussion of possible mechanisms of AOT in brain damaged individuals, when applied in early infancy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)74-77
Number of pages4
JournalDevelopmental Medicine and Child Neurology
Volume58
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 1 2016

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Developmental Neuroscience

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Action observation in infancy: Implications for neuro-rehabilitation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this