Acute effects of direct inhibitory pressure over the biceps brachii myotendinous junction on skeletal muscle activation and force output

Emiliano Cè, Stefano Longo, Emily McCoy, Angela Valentina Bisconti, Davide Tironi, Eloisa Limonta, Susanna Rampichini, Marco Rabuffetti, Fabio Esposito

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Force (F) reduction is reported with myotendinous junction (MTJ) manipulation. Autogenic inhibition reflex (AIR) activation is supposed to be the main mechanism. Still, its role remains unclear. The study aimed at assessing the effects of MTJ direct inhibitory pressure (DIP) on neuromuscular activation and F in the elbow flexor (agonist) and extensor (antagonist) muscles. After maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) assessment, thirty-five participants randomly performed submaximal contractions at 20, 40, 60, and 80% MVC. Electromyographic (EMG), mechanomyographic (MMG), and F signals were recorded. Protocol was repeated under (i) DIP (10-s pressure on the biceps brachii MTJ) with the elbow at 120° (DIP120), (ii) DIP with the elbow at 180° (DIP180), and (iii) without DIP (Ctrl). Electromechanical delay (EMD) components, EMG and MMG root mean square (RMS), and rate of force development (RFD) were calculated. Independently from the angle, DIP induced decrements in MVC, RFD, and RMS of EMG and MMG signals and lengthened the EMD components in agonist muscles (P < 0.05). The DIP-induced decrease in F output of the agonist muscles seems to be possibly due to a concomitant impairment of the neuromuscular activation and a transient decrease in stiffness. After DIP, the antagonist muscle displayed no changes; therefore, the intervention of AIR remains questionable.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)25-34
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Electromyography and Kinesiology
Volume37
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 1 2017

Fingerprint

Skeletal Muscle
Pressure
Elbow
Muscles
Reflex

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience (miscellaneous)
  • Biophysics
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Acute effects of direct inhibitory pressure over the biceps brachii myotendinous junction on skeletal muscle activation and force output. / Cè, Emiliano; Longo, Stefano; McCoy, Emily; Bisconti, Angela Valentina; Tironi, Davide; Limonta, Eloisa; Rampichini, Susanna; Rabuffetti, Marco; Esposito, Fabio.

In: Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, Vol. 37, 01.12.2017, p. 25-34.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cè, Emiliano ; Longo, Stefano ; McCoy, Emily ; Bisconti, Angela Valentina ; Tironi, Davide ; Limonta, Eloisa ; Rampichini, Susanna ; Rabuffetti, Marco ; Esposito, Fabio. / Acute effects of direct inhibitory pressure over the biceps brachii myotendinous junction on skeletal muscle activation and force output. In: Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology. 2017 ; Vol. 37. pp. 25-34.
@article{de8a53455f6f4a2592cc7b353ca70d28,
title = "Acute effects of direct inhibitory pressure over the biceps brachii myotendinous junction on skeletal muscle activation and force output",
abstract = "Force (F) reduction is reported with myotendinous junction (MTJ) manipulation. Autogenic inhibition reflex (AIR) activation is supposed to be the main mechanism. Still, its role remains unclear. The study aimed at assessing the effects of MTJ direct inhibitory pressure (DIP) on neuromuscular activation and F in the elbow flexor (agonist) and extensor (antagonist) muscles. After maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) assessment, thirty-five participants randomly performed submaximal contractions at 20, 40, 60, and 80{\%} MVC. Electromyographic (EMG), mechanomyographic (MMG), and F signals were recorded. Protocol was repeated under (i) DIP (10-s pressure on the biceps brachii MTJ) with the elbow at 120° (DIP120), (ii) DIP with the elbow at 180° (DIP180), and (iii) without DIP (Ctrl). Electromechanical delay (EMD) components, EMG and MMG root mean square (RMS), and rate of force development (RFD) were calculated. Independently from the angle, DIP induced decrements in MVC, RFD, and RMS of EMG and MMG signals and lengthened the EMD components in agonist muscles (P < 0.05). The DIP-induced decrease in F output of the agonist muscles seems to be possibly due to a concomitant impairment of the neuromuscular activation and a transient decrease in stiffness. After DIP, the antagonist muscle displayed no changes; therefore, the intervention of AIR remains questionable.",
author = "Emiliano C{\`e} and Stefano Longo and Emily McCoy and Bisconti, {Angela Valentina} and Davide Tironi and Eloisa Limonta and Susanna Rampichini and Marco Rabuffetti and Fabio Esposito",
year = "2017",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jelekin.2017.08.002",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
pages = "25--34",
journal = "Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology",
issn = "1050-6411",
publisher = "Elsevier Ltd",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Acute effects of direct inhibitory pressure over the biceps brachii myotendinous junction on skeletal muscle activation and force output

AU - Cè, Emiliano

AU - Longo, Stefano

AU - McCoy, Emily

AU - Bisconti, Angela Valentina

AU - Tironi, Davide

AU - Limonta, Eloisa

AU - Rampichini, Susanna

AU - Rabuffetti, Marco

AU - Esposito, Fabio

PY - 2017/12/1

Y1 - 2017/12/1

N2 - Force (F) reduction is reported with myotendinous junction (MTJ) manipulation. Autogenic inhibition reflex (AIR) activation is supposed to be the main mechanism. Still, its role remains unclear. The study aimed at assessing the effects of MTJ direct inhibitory pressure (DIP) on neuromuscular activation and F in the elbow flexor (agonist) and extensor (antagonist) muscles. After maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) assessment, thirty-five participants randomly performed submaximal contractions at 20, 40, 60, and 80% MVC. Electromyographic (EMG), mechanomyographic (MMG), and F signals were recorded. Protocol was repeated under (i) DIP (10-s pressure on the biceps brachii MTJ) with the elbow at 120° (DIP120), (ii) DIP with the elbow at 180° (DIP180), and (iii) without DIP (Ctrl). Electromechanical delay (EMD) components, EMG and MMG root mean square (RMS), and rate of force development (RFD) were calculated. Independently from the angle, DIP induced decrements in MVC, RFD, and RMS of EMG and MMG signals and lengthened the EMD components in agonist muscles (P < 0.05). The DIP-induced decrease in F output of the agonist muscles seems to be possibly due to a concomitant impairment of the neuromuscular activation and a transient decrease in stiffness. After DIP, the antagonist muscle displayed no changes; therefore, the intervention of AIR remains questionable.

AB - Force (F) reduction is reported with myotendinous junction (MTJ) manipulation. Autogenic inhibition reflex (AIR) activation is supposed to be the main mechanism. Still, its role remains unclear. The study aimed at assessing the effects of MTJ direct inhibitory pressure (DIP) on neuromuscular activation and F in the elbow flexor (agonist) and extensor (antagonist) muscles. After maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) assessment, thirty-five participants randomly performed submaximal contractions at 20, 40, 60, and 80% MVC. Electromyographic (EMG), mechanomyographic (MMG), and F signals were recorded. Protocol was repeated under (i) DIP (10-s pressure on the biceps brachii MTJ) with the elbow at 120° (DIP120), (ii) DIP with the elbow at 180° (DIP180), and (iii) without DIP (Ctrl). Electromechanical delay (EMD) components, EMG and MMG root mean square (RMS), and rate of force development (RFD) were calculated. Independently from the angle, DIP induced decrements in MVC, RFD, and RMS of EMG and MMG signals and lengthened the EMD components in agonist muscles (P < 0.05). The DIP-induced decrease in F output of the agonist muscles seems to be possibly due to a concomitant impairment of the neuromuscular activation and a transient decrease in stiffness. After DIP, the antagonist muscle displayed no changes; therefore, the intervention of AIR remains questionable.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85028560074&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85028560074&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jelekin.2017.08.002

DO - 10.1016/j.jelekin.2017.08.002

M3 - Article

VL - 37

SP - 25

EP - 34

JO - Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology

JF - Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology

SN - 1050-6411

ER -