Acute Pain Service e terapia multimodale per il controllo del dolore postoperatorio: Valutazione dell'efficacia dei protocolli

Translated title of the contribution: Acute Pain Service and multimodal therapy for postsurgical pain control: Evaluation of protocol efficacy

Elena Moizo, M. Berti, C. Marchetti, F. Deni, A. Albertin, F. Muzzolon, A. Antonino

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aim. The institution of a postoperative Acute Pain Control Service is mandatory to improve the control of pain induced by surgical injury. Treatment of postoperative pain may be achieved using a combination of analgesic agents and techniques, reducing the incidence of side effects owing to the lower doses of the individual drugs. In 1997 we established an Acute Pain Service (APS) at the San Raffaele Hospital in Milan. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of our APS both in terms of treatment protocols and organisational issues. Methods. In this prospective observational study we included 592 patients undergoing abdominal, gynecological, or orthopedic surgery with severe expected pain. According to general guidelines on pain treatment, the patients were assigned to different treatment protocols based on the kind of operation. All protocols were based on the multimodal therapy, with the association of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDS), opioids and regional anesthesia techniques. During the first 48 h of the postoperative period we recorded vital signs, level of pain and occurrence of any side effect. Results. Our analgesic protocols proved to be effective and safe (low incidence of side effects) for every surgery. The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting was higher in patients receiving patient-controlled morphine than that with continuous epidural or nerve block. After lower abdominal surgery, pain at movement at 24 h was significantly lower in the epidural group than in the Patient Control Analgesia group. Nausea and vomiting, numbness and paresthesias at the lower limbs were higher in gynecological patients. A larger percentage of orthopedic patients in the epidural group reported numbness and paresthesias at the lower limbs in comparison with patients receiving continuous peripheral nerve block. Conclusion. In agreement with previous literature, this study confirmed that a multimodal approach to pain treatment provides an adequate control of postoperative pain, minimizing side effects.

Original languageItalian
Pages (from-to)779-787
Number of pages9
JournalMinerva Anestesiologica
Volume70
Issue number11
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2004

Fingerprint

Pain Clinics
Pain
Postoperative Pain
Hypesthesia
Nerve Block
Paresthesia
Therapeutics
Clinical Protocols
Orthopedics
Analgesics
Lower Extremity
Incidence
Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting
Gynecologic Surgical Procedures
Conduction Anesthesia
Vital Signs
Intraoperative Complications
Peripheral Nerves
Postoperative Period
Pharmaceutical Preparations

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

Moizo, E., Berti, M., Marchetti, C., Deni, F., Albertin, A., Muzzolon, F., & Antonino, A. (2004). Acute Pain Service e terapia multimodale per il controllo del dolore postoperatorio: Valutazione dell'efficacia dei protocolli. Minerva Anestesiologica, 70(11), 779-787.

Acute Pain Service e terapia multimodale per il controllo del dolore postoperatorio : Valutazione dell'efficacia dei protocolli. / Moizo, Elena; Berti, M.; Marchetti, C.; Deni, F.; Albertin, A.; Muzzolon, F.; Antonino, A.

In: Minerva Anestesiologica, Vol. 70, No. 11, 11.2004, p. 779-787.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Moizo, E, Berti, M, Marchetti, C, Deni, F, Albertin, A, Muzzolon, F & Antonino, A 2004, 'Acute Pain Service e terapia multimodale per il controllo del dolore postoperatorio: Valutazione dell'efficacia dei protocolli', Minerva Anestesiologica, vol. 70, no. 11, pp. 779-787.
Moizo, Elena ; Berti, M. ; Marchetti, C. ; Deni, F. ; Albertin, A. ; Muzzolon, F. ; Antonino, A. / Acute Pain Service e terapia multimodale per il controllo del dolore postoperatorio : Valutazione dell'efficacia dei protocolli. In: Minerva Anestesiologica. 2004 ; Vol. 70, No. 11. pp. 779-787.
@article{5f37a5bf4fcb440181b0622d27f265a0,
title = "Acute Pain Service e terapia multimodale per il controllo del dolore postoperatorio: Valutazione dell'efficacia dei protocolli",
abstract = "Aim. The institution of a postoperative Acute Pain Control Service is mandatory to improve the control of pain induced by surgical injury. Treatment of postoperative pain may be achieved using a combination of analgesic agents and techniques, reducing the incidence of side effects owing to the lower doses of the individual drugs. In 1997 we established an Acute Pain Service (APS) at the San Raffaele Hospital in Milan. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of our APS both in terms of treatment protocols and organisational issues. Methods. In this prospective observational study we included 592 patients undergoing abdominal, gynecological, or orthopedic surgery with severe expected pain. According to general guidelines on pain treatment, the patients were assigned to different treatment protocols based on the kind of operation. All protocols were based on the multimodal therapy, with the association of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDS), opioids and regional anesthesia techniques. During the first 48 h of the postoperative period we recorded vital signs, level of pain and occurrence of any side effect. Results. Our analgesic protocols proved to be effective and safe (low incidence of side effects) for every surgery. The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting was higher in patients receiving patient-controlled morphine than that with continuous epidural or nerve block. After lower abdominal surgery, pain at movement at 24 h was significantly lower in the epidural group than in the Patient Control Analgesia group. Nausea and vomiting, numbness and paresthesias at the lower limbs were higher in gynecological patients. A larger percentage of orthopedic patients in the epidural group reported numbness and paresthesias at the lower limbs in comparison with patients receiving continuous peripheral nerve block. Conclusion. In agreement with previous literature, this study confirmed that a multimodal approach to pain treatment provides an adequate control of postoperative pain, minimizing side effects.",
keywords = "Abdomen surgery, Analgesia, epidural, Analgesia, perineural, side effects, Combined modality therapy, Gynecologic surgical procedures, Orthopedics, Pain, postoperative, prevention and control, Postoperative pain",
author = "Elena Moizo and M. Berti and C. Marchetti and F. Deni and A. Albertin and F. Muzzolon and A. Antonino",
year = "2004",
month = "11",
language = "Italian",
volume = "70",
pages = "779--787",
journal = "Minerva Anestesiologica",
issn = "0375-9393",
publisher = "Edizioni Minerva Medica S.p.A.",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Acute Pain Service e terapia multimodale per il controllo del dolore postoperatorio

T2 - Valutazione dell'efficacia dei protocolli

AU - Moizo, Elena

AU - Berti, M.

AU - Marchetti, C.

AU - Deni, F.

AU - Albertin, A.

AU - Muzzolon, F.

AU - Antonino, A.

PY - 2004/11

Y1 - 2004/11

N2 - Aim. The institution of a postoperative Acute Pain Control Service is mandatory to improve the control of pain induced by surgical injury. Treatment of postoperative pain may be achieved using a combination of analgesic agents and techniques, reducing the incidence of side effects owing to the lower doses of the individual drugs. In 1997 we established an Acute Pain Service (APS) at the San Raffaele Hospital in Milan. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of our APS both in terms of treatment protocols and organisational issues. Methods. In this prospective observational study we included 592 patients undergoing abdominal, gynecological, or orthopedic surgery with severe expected pain. According to general guidelines on pain treatment, the patients were assigned to different treatment protocols based on the kind of operation. All protocols were based on the multimodal therapy, with the association of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDS), opioids and regional anesthesia techniques. During the first 48 h of the postoperative period we recorded vital signs, level of pain and occurrence of any side effect. Results. Our analgesic protocols proved to be effective and safe (low incidence of side effects) for every surgery. The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting was higher in patients receiving patient-controlled morphine than that with continuous epidural or nerve block. After lower abdominal surgery, pain at movement at 24 h was significantly lower in the epidural group than in the Patient Control Analgesia group. Nausea and vomiting, numbness and paresthesias at the lower limbs were higher in gynecological patients. A larger percentage of orthopedic patients in the epidural group reported numbness and paresthesias at the lower limbs in comparison with patients receiving continuous peripheral nerve block. Conclusion. In agreement with previous literature, this study confirmed that a multimodal approach to pain treatment provides an adequate control of postoperative pain, minimizing side effects.

AB - Aim. The institution of a postoperative Acute Pain Control Service is mandatory to improve the control of pain induced by surgical injury. Treatment of postoperative pain may be achieved using a combination of analgesic agents and techniques, reducing the incidence of side effects owing to the lower doses of the individual drugs. In 1997 we established an Acute Pain Service (APS) at the San Raffaele Hospital in Milan. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of our APS both in terms of treatment protocols and organisational issues. Methods. In this prospective observational study we included 592 patients undergoing abdominal, gynecological, or orthopedic surgery with severe expected pain. According to general guidelines on pain treatment, the patients were assigned to different treatment protocols based on the kind of operation. All protocols were based on the multimodal therapy, with the association of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDS), opioids and regional anesthesia techniques. During the first 48 h of the postoperative period we recorded vital signs, level of pain and occurrence of any side effect. Results. Our analgesic protocols proved to be effective and safe (low incidence of side effects) for every surgery. The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting was higher in patients receiving patient-controlled morphine than that with continuous epidural or nerve block. After lower abdominal surgery, pain at movement at 24 h was significantly lower in the epidural group than in the Patient Control Analgesia group. Nausea and vomiting, numbness and paresthesias at the lower limbs were higher in gynecological patients. A larger percentage of orthopedic patients in the epidural group reported numbness and paresthesias at the lower limbs in comparison with patients receiving continuous peripheral nerve block. Conclusion. In agreement with previous literature, this study confirmed that a multimodal approach to pain treatment provides an adequate control of postoperative pain, minimizing side effects.

KW - Abdomen surgery

KW - Analgesia, epidural

KW - Analgesia, perineural, side effects

KW - Combined modality therapy

KW - Gynecologic surgical procedures

KW - Orthopedics

KW - Pain, postoperative, prevention and control

KW - Postoperative pain

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=14044252260&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=14044252260&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Articolo

C2 - 15699914

AN - SCOPUS:14044252260

VL - 70

SP - 779

EP - 787

JO - Minerva Anestesiologica

JF - Minerva Anestesiologica

SN - 0375-9393

IS - 11

ER -