Adaptation of non-technical skills behavioural markers for delivery room simulation

Fabrizio Bracco, Michele Masini, Gabriele De Tonetti, Francesca Brogioni, Arianna Amidani, Sara Monichino, Alessandra Maltoni, Andrea Dato, Claudia Grattarola, Massimo Cordone, Giancarlo Torre, Claudio Launo, Carlo Chiorri, Danilo Celleno

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Simulation in healthcare has proved to be a useful method in improving skills and increasing the safety of clinical operations. The debriefing session, after the simulated scenario, is the core of the simulation, since it allows participants to integrate the experience with the theoretical frameworks and the procedural guidelines. There is consistent evidence for the relevance of non-technical skills (NTS) for the safe and efficient accomplishment of operations. However, the observation, assessment and feedback on these skills is particularly complex, because the process needs expert observers and the feedback is often provided in judgmental and ineffective ways. The aim of this study was therefore to develop and test a set of observation and rating forms for the NTS behavioural markers of multi-professional teams involved in delivery room emergency simulations (MINTS-DR, Multi-professional Inventory for Non-Technical Skills in the Delivery Room).

METHODS: The MINTS-DR was developed by adapting the existing tools and, when needed, by designing new tools according to the literature. We followed a bottom-up process accompanied by interviews and co-design between practitioners and psychology experts. The forms were specific for anaesthetists, gynaecologists, nurses/midwives, assistants, plus a global team assessment tool. We administered the tools in five editions of a simulation training course that involved 48 practitioners. Ratings on usability and usefulness were collected.

RESULTS: The mean ratings of the usability and usefulness of the tools were not statistically different to or higher than 4 on a 5-point rating scale. In either case no significant differences were found across professional categories.

CONCLUSION: The MINTS-DR is quick and easy to administer. It is judged to be a useful asset in maximising the learning experience that is provided by the simulation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)89
JournalBMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Volume17
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 17 2017

Fingerprint

Delivery Rooms
Equipment and Supplies
Observation
Nurse Midwives
Emergencies
Learning
Guidelines
Interviews
Psychology
Delivery of Health Care
Safety

Keywords

  • Adult
  • Anesthesiology
  • Clinical Competence
  • Cognition
  • Communication
  • Delivery Rooms
  • Eclampsia
  • Emergencies
  • Female
  • Formative Feedback
  • Humans
  • Interprofessional Relations
  • Male
  • Maternal-Child Nursing
  • Middle Aged
  • Midwifery
  • Obstetrics
  • Patient Care Team
  • Postpartum Hemorrhage
  • Pregnancy
  • Seizures
  • Simulation Training
  • Social Skills
  • Uterine Hemorrhage
  • Uterine Inertia
  • Young Adult
  • Journal Article

Cite this

Adaptation of non-technical skills behavioural markers for delivery room simulation. / Bracco, Fabrizio; Masini, Michele; De Tonetti, Gabriele; Brogioni, Francesca; Amidani, Arianna; Monichino, Sara; Maltoni, Alessandra; Dato, Andrea; Grattarola, Claudia; Cordone, Massimo; Torre, Giancarlo; Launo, Claudio; Chiorri, Carlo; Celleno, Danilo.

In: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, Vol. 17, No. 1, 17.03.2017, p. 89.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{295baf1c8ae24870a74ae94acc79bebb,
title = "Adaptation of non-technical skills behavioural markers for delivery room simulation",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Simulation in healthcare has proved to be a useful method in improving skills and increasing the safety of clinical operations. The debriefing session, after the simulated scenario, is the core of the simulation, since it allows participants to integrate the experience with the theoretical frameworks and the procedural guidelines. There is consistent evidence for the relevance of non-technical skills (NTS) for the safe and efficient accomplishment of operations. However, the observation, assessment and feedback on these skills is particularly complex, because the process needs expert observers and the feedback is often provided in judgmental and ineffective ways. The aim of this study was therefore to develop and test a set of observation and rating forms for the NTS behavioural markers of multi-professional teams involved in delivery room emergency simulations (MINTS-DR, Multi-professional Inventory for Non-Technical Skills in the Delivery Room).METHODS: The MINTS-DR was developed by adapting the existing tools and, when needed, by designing new tools according to the literature. We followed a bottom-up process accompanied by interviews and co-design between practitioners and psychology experts. The forms were specific for anaesthetists, gynaecologists, nurses/midwives, assistants, plus a global team assessment tool. We administered the tools in five editions of a simulation training course that involved 48 practitioners. Ratings on usability and usefulness were collected.RESULTS: The mean ratings of the usability and usefulness of the tools were not statistically different to or higher than 4 on a 5-point rating scale. In either case no significant differences were found across professional categories.CONCLUSION: The MINTS-DR is quick and easy to administer. It is judged to be a useful asset in maximising the learning experience that is provided by the simulation.",
keywords = "Adult, Anesthesiology, Clinical Competence, Cognition, Communication, Delivery Rooms, Eclampsia, Emergencies, Female, Formative Feedback, Humans, Interprofessional Relations, Male, Maternal-Child Nursing, Middle Aged, Midwifery, Obstetrics, Patient Care Team, Postpartum Hemorrhage, Pregnancy, Seizures, Simulation Training, Social Skills, Uterine Hemorrhage, Uterine Inertia, Young Adult, Journal Article",
author = "Fabrizio Bracco and Michele Masini and {De Tonetti}, Gabriele and Francesca Brogioni and Arianna Amidani and Sara Monichino and Alessandra Maltoni and Andrea Dato and Claudia Grattarola and Massimo Cordone and Giancarlo Torre and Claudio Launo and Carlo Chiorri and Danilo Celleno",
year = "2017",
month = "3",
day = "17",
doi = "10.1186/s12884-017-1274-z",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "89",
journal = "BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth",
issn = "1471-2393",
publisher = "BioMed Central",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Adaptation of non-technical skills behavioural markers for delivery room simulation

AU - Bracco, Fabrizio

AU - Masini, Michele

AU - De Tonetti, Gabriele

AU - Brogioni, Francesca

AU - Amidani, Arianna

AU - Monichino, Sara

AU - Maltoni, Alessandra

AU - Dato, Andrea

AU - Grattarola, Claudia

AU - Cordone, Massimo

AU - Torre, Giancarlo

AU - Launo, Claudio

AU - Chiorri, Carlo

AU - Celleno, Danilo

PY - 2017/3/17

Y1 - 2017/3/17

N2 - BACKGROUND: Simulation in healthcare has proved to be a useful method in improving skills and increasing the safety of clinical operations. The debriefing session, after the simulated scenario, is the core of the simulation, since it allows participants to integrate the experience with the theoretical frameworks and the procedural guidelines. There is consistent evidence for the relevance of non-technical skills (NTS) for the safe and efficient accomplishment of operations. However, the observation, assessment and feedback on these skills is particularly complex, because the process needs expert observers and the feedback is often provided in judgmental and ineffective ways. The aim of this study was therefore to develop and test a set of observation and rating forms for the NTS behavioural markers of multi-professional teams involved in delivery room emergency simulations (MINTS-DR, Multi-professional Inventory for Non-Technical Skills in the Delivery Room).METHODS: The MINTS-DR was developed by adapting the existing tools and, when needed, by designing new tools according to the literature. We followed a bottom-up process accompanied by interviews and co-design between practitioners and psychology experts. The forms were specific for anaesthetists, gynaecologists, nurses/midwives, assistants, plus a global team assessment tool. We administered the tools in five editions of a simulation training course that involved 48 practitioners. Ratings on usability and usefulness were collected.RESULTS: The mean ratings of the usability and usefulness of the tools were not statistically different to or higher than 4 on a 5-point rating scale. In either case no significant differences were found across professional categories.CONCLUSION: The MINTS-DR is quick and easy to administer. It is judged to be a useful asset in maximising the learning experience that is provided by the simulation.

AB - BACKGROUND: Simulation in healthcare has proved to be a useful method in improving skills and increasing the safety of clinical operations. The debriefing session, after the simulated scenario, is the core of the simulation, since it allows participants to integrate the experience with the theoretical frameworks and the procedural guidelines. There is consistent evidence for the relevance of non-technical skills (NTS) for the safe and efficient accomplishment of operations. However, the observation, assessment and feedback on these skills is particularly complex, because the process needs expert observers and the feedback is often provided in judgmental and ineffective ways. The aim of this study was therefore to develop and test a set of observation and rating forms for the NTS behavioural markers of multi-professional teams involved in delivery room emergency simulations (MINTS-DR, Multi-professional Inventory for Non-Technical Skills in the Delivery Room).METHODS: The MINTS-DR was developed by adapting the existing tools and, when needed, by designing new tools according to the literature. We followed a bottom-up process accompanied by interviews and co-design between practitioners and psychology experts. The forms were specific for anaesthetists, gynaecologists, nurses/midwives, assistants, plus a global team assessment tool. We administered the tools in five editions of a simulation training course that involved 48 practitioners. Ratings on usability and usefulness were collected.RESULTS: The mean ratings of the usability and usefulness of the tools were not statistically different to or higher than 4 on a 5-point rating scale. In either case no significant differences were found across professional categories.CONCLUSION: The MINTS-DR is quick and easy to administer. It is judged to be a useful asset in maximising the learning experience that is provided by the simulation.

KW - Adult

KW - Anesthesiology

KW - Clinical Competence

KW - Cognition

KW - Communication

KW - Delivery Rooms

KW - Eclampsia

KW - Emergencies

KW - Female

KW - Formative Feedback

KW - Humans

KW - Interprofessional Relations

KW - Male

KW - Maternal-Child Nursing

KW - Middle Aged

KW - Midwifery

KW - Obstetrics

KW - Patient Care Team

KW - Postpartum Hemorrhage

KW - Pregnancy

KW - Seizures

KW - Simulation Training

KW - Social Skills

KW - Uterine Hemorrhage

KW - Uterine Inertia

KW - Young Adult

KW - Journal Article

U2 - 10.1186/s12884-017-1274-z

DO - 10.1186/s12884-017-1274-z

M3 - Article

C2 - 28302085

VL - 17

SP - 89

JO - BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

JF - BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

SN - 1471-2393

IS - 1

ER -