Adenomyosis: epidemiological factors

Paolo Vercellini, Paola Viganò, Edgar Somigliana, Raffaella Daguati, Annalisa Abbiati, Luigi Fedele

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

131 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Epidemiological studies of adenomyosis are difficult to interpret because the diagnostic criteria vary so widely that the disease may be easily over-diagnosed. This would severely hamper any attempt to define incidence and prevalence of the condition and the related risk factors, and would limit the possibility of clarifying to what extent adenomyosis contributes to clinical symptoms. There is a need for stringent and widely accepted diagnostic criteria in order to define not only the presence of adenomyosis but also depth of penetration and degree of spread of foci. Moreover, the evidence available on epidemiological characteristics of women with adenomyosis is greatly biased by the type of population studied, i.e. women undergoing hysterectomy. Therefore, a consensus on non-surgical diagnostic criteria at transvaginal ultrasonography and MRI is indispensable and urgently needed in order to be able to conduct epidemiological studies in women younger than those evaluated until now.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)465-477
Number of pages13
JournalBest Practice and Research: Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Volume20
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2006

Fingerprint

Adenomyosis
Epidemiologic Studies
Hysterectomy
Ultrasonography
Incidence
Population

Keywords

  • adenomyosis
  • hysterectomy
  • infertility
  • menhorragia
  • pelvic pain

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Cite this

Adenomyosis : epidemiological factors. / Vercellini, Paolo; Viganò, Paola; Somigliana, Edgar; Daguati, Raffaella; Abbiati, Annalisa; Fedele, Luigi.

In: Best Practice and Research: Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Vol. 20, No. 4, 08.2006, p. 465-477.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{935819e3862d414a8ebe49bc33e30074,
title = "Adenomyosis: epidemiological factors",
abstract = "Epidemiological studies of adenomyosis are difficult to interpret because the diagnostic criteria vary so widely that the disease may be easily over-diagnosed. This would severely hamper any attempt to define incidence and prevalence of the condition and the related risk factors, and would limit the possibility of clarifying to what extent adenomyosis contributes to clinical symptoms. There is a need for stringent and widely accepted diagnostic criteria in order to define not only the presence of adenomyosis but also depth of penetration and degree of spread of foci. Moreover, the evidence available on epidemiological characteristics of women with adenomyosis is greatly biased by the type of population studied, i.e. women undergoing hysterectomy. Therefore, a consensus on non-surgical diagnostic criteria at transvaginal ultrasonography and MRI is indispensable and urgently needed in order to be able to conduct epidemiological studies in women younger than those evaluated until now.",
keywords = "adenomyosis, hysterectomy, infertility, menhorragia, pelvic pain",
author = "Paolo Vercellini and Paola Vigan{\`o} and Edgar Somigliana and Raffaella Daguati and Annalisa Abbiati and Luigi Fedele",
year = "2006",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2006.01.017",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "465--477",
journal = "Best Practice and Research in Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology",
issn = "1521-6934",
publisher = "Bailliere Tindall Ltd",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Adenomyosis

T2 - epidemiological factors

AU - Vercellini, Paolo

AU - Viganò, Paola

AU - Somigliana, Edgar

AU - Daguati, Raffaella

AU - Abbiati, Annalisa

AU - Fedele, Luigi

PY - 2006/8

Y1 - 2006/8

N2 - Epidemiological studies of adenomyosis are difficult to interpret because the diagnostic criteria vary so widely that the disease may be easily over-diagnosed. This would severely hamper any attempt to define incidence and prevalence of the condition and the related risk factors, and would limit the possibility of clarifying to what extent adenomyosis contributes to clinical symptoms. There is a need for stringent and widely accepted diagnostic criteria in order to define not only the presence of adenomyosis but also depth of penetration and degree of spread of foci. Moreover, the evidence available on epidemiological characteristics of women with adenomyosis is greatly biased by the type of population studied, i.e. women undergoing hysterectomy. Therefore, a consensus on non-surgical diagnostic criteria at transvaginal ultrasonography and MRI is indispensable and urgently needed in order to be able to conduct epidemiological studies in women younger than those evaluated until now.

AB - Epidemiological studies of adenomyosis are difficult to interpret because the diagnostic criteria vary so widely that the disease may be easily over-diagnosed. This would severely hamper any attempt to define incidence and prevalence of the condition and the related risk factors, and would limit the possibility of clarifying to what extent adenomyosis contributes to clinical symptoms. There is a need for stringent and widely accepted diagnostic criteria in order to define not only the presence of adenomyosis but also depth of penetration and degree of spread of foci. Moreover, the evidence available on epidemiological characteristics of women with adenomyosis is greatly biased by the type of population studied, i.e. women undergoing hysterectomy. Therefore, a consensus on non-surgical diagnostic criteria at transvaginal ultrasonography and MRI is indispensable and urgently needed in order to be able to conduct epidemiological studies in women younger than those evaluated until now.

KW - adenomyosis

KW - hysterectomy

KW - infertility

KW - menhorragia

KW - pelvic pain

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33750610747&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33750610747&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2006.01.017

DO - 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2006.01.017

M3 - Article

C2 - 16563868

AN - SCOPUS:33750610747

VL - 20

SP - 465

EP - 477

JO - Best Practice and Research in Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology

JF - Best Practice and Research in Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology

SN - 1521-6934

IS - 4

ER -