Agreement between pentacam and videokeratography in corneal power assessment

Giacomo Savini, Piero Barboni, Michele Carbonelli, Kenneth J. Hoffer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

55 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate agreement between a rotating Scheimpflug camera (Pentacam, Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH) and two corneal topographers (TMS-2 Topography System, Tomey; and Keratron Scout, Optikon 2000 SpA) in measuring the corneal power of normal eyes. METHODS: The mean corneal powers calculated by simulated keratometry (SimK) with each topographer were compared to those provided by the Pentacam in 71 patients. Specifically, the corneal power values of the Pentacam included in this analysis were the SimK (calculated using the measured anterior corneal radius and standard keratometric index of 1.3375) and the True net power (calculated using the anterior and posterior corneal curvatures and Gaussian optics formula for thick lenses, where the actual refractive index of the air, cornea, and aqueous humor are entered). Bland-Altman plots were used to investigate agreement and analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed to detect statistical differences. RESULTS: Although ANOVA did not disclose a statistically significant difference among the mean SimK values (TMS-2: 43.20±1.51 diopters [D], Keratron Scout: 43.29±1.48 D, Pentacam: 43.25±1.53 D), the 95% limits of agreement between the TMS-2 and Pentacam and between the Keratron Scout and Pentacam were wide (-1.05 to +0.94 D and -0.95 to +1.02 D, respectively). Agreement was even poorer when considering the mean True net power (42.00±1.54 D), which was significantly lower than the mean Pentacam SimK (P

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)534-538
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Refractive Surgery
Volume25
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2009

Fingerprint

Corneal Topography
Analysis of Variance
Refractometry
Aqueous Humor
Cornea
Lenses
Air

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology
  • Surgery

Cite this

Agreement between pentacam and videokeratography in corneal power assessment. / Savini, Giacomo; Barboni, Piero; Carbonelli, Michele; Hoffer, Kenneth J.

In: Journal of Refractive Surgery, Vol. 25, No. 6, 06.2009, p. 534-538.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Savini, Giacomo ; Barboni, Piero ; Carbonelli, Michele ; Hoffer, Kenneth J. / Agreement between pentacam and videokeratography in corneal power assessment. In: Journal of Refractive Surgery. 2009 ; Vol. 25, No. 6. pp. 534-538.
@article{e52e2df6dd4a41a58ffa9e3867c4d07d,
title = "Agreement between pentacam and videokeratography in corneal power assessment",
abstract = "PURPOSE: To investigate agreement between a rotating Scheimpflug camera (Pentacam, Oculus Optikger{\"a}te GmbH) and two corneal topographers (TMS-2 Topography System, Tomey; and Keratron Scout, Optikon 2000 SpA) in measuring the corneal power of normal eyes. METHODS: The mean corneal powers calculated by simulated keratometry (SimK) with each topographer were compared to those provided by the Pentacam in 71 patients. Specifically, the corneal power values of the Pentacam included in this analysis were the SimK (calculated using the measured anterior corneal radius and standard keratometric index of 1.3375) and the True net power (calculated using the anterior and posterior corneal curvatures and Gaussian optics formula for thick lenses, where the actual refractive index of the air, cornea, and aqueous humor are entered). Bland-Altman plots were used to investigate agreement and analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed to detect statistical differences. RESULTS: Although ANOVA did not disclose a statistically significant difference among the mean SimK values (TMS-2: 43.20±1.51 diopters [D], Keratron Scout: 43.29±1.48 D, Pentacam: 43.25±1.53 D), the 95{\%} limits of agreement between the TMS-2 and Pentacam and between the Keratron Scout and Pentacam were wide (-1.05 to +0.94 D and -0.95 to +1.02 D, respectively). Agreement was even poorer when considering the mean True net power (42.00±1.54 D), which was significantly lower than the mean Pentacam SimK (P",
author = "Giacomo Savini and Piero Barboni and Michele Carbonelli and Hoffer, {Kenneth J.}",
year = "2009",
month = "6",
doi = "10.3928/1081597X-20090512-07",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "534--538",
journal = "Journal of Refractive Surgery",
issn = "1081-597X",
publisher = "Slack Incorporated",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Agreement between pentacam and videokeratography in corneal power assessment

AU - Savini, Giacomo

AU - Barboni, Piero

AU - Carbonelli, Michele

AU - Hoffer, Kenneth J.

PY - 2009/6

Y1 - 2009/6

N2 - PURPOSE: To investigate agreement between a rotating Scheimpflug camera (Pentacam, Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH) and two corneal topographers (TMS-2 Topography System, Tomey; and Keratron Scout, Optikon 2000 SpA) in measuring the corneal power of normal eyes. METHODS: The mean corneal powers calculated by simulated keratometry (SimK) with each topographer were compared to those provided by the Pentacam in 71 patients. Specifically, the corneal power values of the Pentacam included in this analysis were the SimK (calculated using the measured anterior corneal radius and standard keratometric index of 1.3375) and the True net power (calculated using the anterior and posterior corneal curvatures and Gaussian optics formula for thick lenses, where the actual refractive index of the air, cornea, and aqueous humor are entered). Bland-Altman plots were used to investigate agreement and analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed to detect statistical differences. RESULTS: Although ANOVA did not disclose a statistically significant difference among the mean SimK values (TMS-2: 43.20±1.51 diopters [D], Keratron Scout: 43.29±1.48 D, Pentacam: 43.25±1.53 D), the 95% limits of agreement between the TMS-2 and Pentacam and between the Keratron Scout and Pentacam were wide (-1.05 to +0.94 D and -0.95 to +1.02 D, respectively). Agreement was even poorer when considering the mean True net power (42.00±1.54 D), which was significantly lower than the mean Pentacam SimK (P

AB - PURPOSE: To investigate agreement between a rotating Scheimpflug camera (Pentacam, Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH) and two corneal topographers (TMS-2 Topography System, Tomey; and Keratron Scout, Optikon 2000 SpA) in measuring the corneal power of normal eyes. METHODS: The mean corneal powers calculated by simulated keratometry (SimK) with each topographer were compared to those provided by the Pentacam in 71 patients. Specifically, the corneal power values of the Pentacam included in this analysis were the SimK (calculated using the measured anterior corneal radius and standard keratometric index of 1.3375) and the True net power (calculated using the anterior and posterior corneal curvatures and Gaussian optics formula for thick lenses, where the actual refractive index of the air, cornea, and aqueous humor are entered). Bland-Altman plots were used to investigate agreement and analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed to detect statistical differences. RESULTS: Although ANOVA did not disclose a statistically significant difference among the mean SimK values (TMS-2: 43.20±1.51 diopters [D], Keratron Scout: 43.29±1.48 D, Pentacam: 43.25±1.53 D), the 95% limits of agreement between the TMS-2 and Pentacam and between the Keratron Scout and Pentacam were wide (-1.05 to +0.94 D and -0.95 to +1.02 D, respectively). Agreement was even poorer when considering the mean True net power (42.00±1.54 D), which was significantly lower than the mean Pentacam SimK (P

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67649360554&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=67649360554&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3928/1081597X-20090512-07

DO - 10.3928/1081597X-20090512-07

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 534

EP - 538

JO - Journal of Refractive Surgery

JF - Journal of Refractive Surgery

SN - 1081-597X

IS - 6

ER -