Ambulatory blood pressure normalcy

The PAMELA study

G. Cesana, G. De Vito, M. Ferrario, A. Libretti, G. Mancia, P. Mocarelli, R. Sega, F. Valagussa, A. Zanchetti

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

60 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Although ambulatory blood pressure monitoring is gaining in popularity, it still has important limitations in clinical use, particularly for the definition and diagnosis of hypertension. Various attempts have been made to calculate 'normal' or 'reference' values for ambulatory blood pressure, mostly by 24-h non-invasive monitoring in groups of 'normal' subjects. The most appropriate approach, however, is to compare 24-h ambulatory blood pressure values and casual or clinic blood pressure values in a random sample of a suitably large population. The PAMELA Study has been planned to obtain an epidemiological evaluation of 24-h ambulatory blood pressure values, and its design is described here. In the city of Monza, 2400 subjects aged between 25 and 64 years have been randomly selected according to World Health Organization Monitoring Cardiovascular Diseases (WHO-MONICA) project criteria within sex and age strata. In these subjects, clinic blood pressure, random-zero blood pressure, ambulatory blood pressure (24-h monitoring with SpaceLabs 90207; Redmond, Washington, USA), home blood pressure, electrocardiographic and echocardiographic indices, cardiovascular risk factors and psychological variables are being measured.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Hypertension
Volume9
Issue numberSUPPL. 3
Publication statusPublished - 1991

Fingerprint

Blood Pressure
Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring
Reference Values
Cardiovascular Diseases
Psychology
Hypertension
Population

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Endocrinology
  • Internal Medicine

Cite this

Cesana, G., De Vito, G., Ferrario, M., Libretti, A., Mancia, G., Mocarelli, P., ... Zanchetti, A. (1991). Ambulatory blood pressure normalcy: The PAMELA study. Journal of Hypertension, 9(SUPPL. 3).

Ambulatory blood pressure normalcy : The PAMELA study. / Cesana, G.; De Vito, G.; Ferrario, M.; Libretti, A.; Mancia, G.; Mocarelli, P.; Sega, R.; Valagussa, F.; Zanchetti, A.

In: Journal of Hypertension, Vol. 9, No. SUPPL. 3, 1991.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cesana, G, De Vito, G, Ferrario, M, Libretti, A, Mancia, G, Mocarelli, P, Sega, R, Valagussa, F & Zanchetti, A 1991, 'Ambulatory blood pressure normalcy: The PAMELA study', Journal of Hypertension, vol. 9, no. SUPPL. 3.
Cesana G, De Vito G, Ferrario M, Libretti A, Mancia G, Mocarelli P et al. Ambulatory blood pressure normalcy: The PAMELA study. Journal of Hypertension. 1991;9(SUPPL. 3).
Cesana, G. ; De Vito, G. ; Ferrario, M. ; Libretti, A. ; Mancia, G. ; Mocarelli, P. ; Sega, R. ; Valagussa, F. ; Zanchetti, A. / Ambulatory blood pressure normalcy : The PAMELA study. In: Journal of Hypertension. 1991 ; Vol. 9, No. SUPPL. 3.
@article{c1616eb82dfa4c5cb79cbe17f35cfde5,
title = "Ambulatory blood pressure normalcy: The PAMELA study",
abstract = "Although ambulatory blood pressure monitoring is gaining in popularity, it still has important limitations in clinical use, particularly for the definition and diagnosis of hypertension. Various attempts have been made to calculate 'normal' or 'reference' values for ambulatory blood pressure, mostly by 24-h non-invasive monitoring in groups of 'normal' subjects. The most appropriate approach, however, is to compare 24-h ambulatory blood pressure values and casual or clinic blood pressure values in a random sample of a suitably large population. The PAMELA Study has been planned to obtain an epidemiological evaluation of 24-h ambulatory blood pressure values, and its design is described here. In the city of Monza, 2400 subjects aged between 25 and 64 years have been randomly selected according to World Health Organization Monitoring Cardiovascular Diseases (WHO-MONICA) project criteria within sex and age strata. In these subjects, clinic blood pressure, random-zero blood pressure, ambulatory blood pressure (24-h monitoring with SpaceLabs 90207; Redmond, Washington, USA), home blood pressure, electrocardiographic and echocardiographic indices, cardiovascular risk factors and psychological variables are being measured.",
author = "G. Cesana and {De Vito}, G. and M. Ferrario and A. Libretti and G. Mancia and P. Mocarelli and R. Sega and F. Valagussa and A. Zanchetti",
year = "1991",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
journal = "Journal of Hypertension",
issn = "0263-6352",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "SUPPL. 3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ambulatory blood pressure normalcy

T2 - The PAMELA study

AU - Cesana, G.

AU - De Vito, G.

AU - Ferrario, M.

AU - Libretti, A.

AU - Mancia, G.

AU - Mocarelli, P.

AU - Sega, R.

AU - Valagussa, F.

AU - Zanchetti, A.

PY - 1991

Y1 - 1991

N2 - Although ambulatory blood pressure monitoring is gaining in popularity, it still has important limitations in clinical use, particularly for the definition and diagnosis of hypertension. Various attempts have been made to calculate 'normal' or 'reference' values for ambulatory blood pressure, mostly by 24-h non-invasive monitoring in groups of 'normal' subjects. The most appropriate approach, however, is to compare 24-h ambulatory blood pressure values and casual or clinic blood pressure values in a random sample of a suitably large population. The PAMELA Study has been planned to obtain an epidemiological evaluation of 24-h ambulatory blood pressure values, and its design is described here. In the city of Monza, 2400 subjects aged between 25 and 64 years have been randomly selected according to World Health Organization Monitoring Cardiovascular Diseases (WHO-MONICA) project criteria within sex and age strata. In these subjects, clinic blood pressure, random-zero blood pressure, ambulatory blood pressure (24-h monitoring with SpaceLabs 90207; Redmond, Washington, USA), home blood pressure, electrocardiographic and echocardiographic indices, cardiovascular risk factors and psychological variables are being measured.

AB - Although ambulatory blood pressure monitoring is gaining in popularity, it still has important limitations in clinical use, particularly for the definition and diagnosis of hypertension. Various attempts have been made to calculate 'normal' or 'reference' values for ambulatory blood pressure, mostly by 24-h non-invasive monitoring in groups of 'normal' subjects. The most appropriate approach, however, is to compare 24-h ambulatory blood pressure values and casual or clinic blood pressure values in a random sample of a suitably large population. The PAMELA Study has been planned to obtain an epidemiological evaluation of 24-h ambulatory blood pressure values, and its design is described here. In the city of Monza, 2400 subjects aged between 25 and 64 years have been randomly selected according to World Health Organization Monitoring Cardiovascular Diseases (WHO-MONICA) project criteria within sex and age strata. In these subjects, clinic blood pressure, random-zero blood pressure, ambulatory blood pressure (24-h monitoring with SpaceLabs 90207; Redmond, Washington, USA), home blood pressure, electrocardiographic and echocardiographic indices, cardiovascular risk factors and psychological variables are being measured.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=17344395379&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=17344395379&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 9

JO - Journal of Hypertension

JF - Journal of Hypertension

SN - 0263-6352

IS - SUPPL. 3

ER -