Amebic infections due to the Entamoeba histolytica-Entamoeba dispar complex: A study of the incidence in a remote rural area of Ecuador

Simonetta Gatti, Giovanni Swierczynski, Francisco Robinson, Mariella Anselmi, Javier Corrales, Juan Moreira, Gregorio Montalvo, Antonella Bruno, Roberta Maserati, Zeno Bisoffi, Massimo Scaglia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

An epidemiologic field study was conducted in the village of Borbòn in Esmeraldas province in northern Ecuador to compare different parasitologic methods in the diagnosis of infection with the Entamoeba histolytica/Entamoeba dispar complex. The results of two stool antigen detection assays (the Prospect™ Entamoeba histolytica microplate assay and the E. histolytica II™ assay) were compared with isoenzyme characterization of the amebic isolates. Nearly all (176 of 178, 98.9%) subjects were positive for intestinal parasites on direct microscopic examination, and cysts and/or vegetative forms morphologically consistent with the E. histolytica/E dispar complex were recorded in 48 of 178 cases (27%). Culture in Robinson's medium was positive for amebic stocks in 89 (50%) of the 178 samples tested. Of the 37 isolates successfully stabilized, cloned, and characterized by zymodeme analysis, seven (18.9%) showed isoenzyme patterns of E. histolytica, whereas 26 (70.3%) showed patterns of E. dispar. The remaining four strains were identified as Entamoeba coli (three isolates; 8.1%) and Dientamoeba fragilis (one strain; 2.7%). The immunochromatographic tests showed different degrees of sensitivity and specificity when compared with isoenzyme characterization as the reference technique. The microplate assay, which does not discriminate between E. histolytica and E.dispar, showed a sensitivity of 54.5% and a specificity of 94% for both these amebic species. In contrast, the second-generation E. histolytica II test had a sensitivity of 14.3% and a specificity of 98.4% for E. histolytica sensu stricto. Our survey clearly demonstrated that more specific and sensitive diagnostic tests, such as stool antigen detection assays and isoenzyme analysis, are needed to establish the actual worldwide distribution of E. histolytica and E. dispar.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)123-127
Number of pages5
JournalAmerican Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
Volume67
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2002

Fingerprint

Entamoeba
Ecuador
Entamoeba histolytica
Cohort Studies
Infection
Isoenzymes
Dientamoeba
Antigens
Routine Diagnostic Tests
Cysts
Epidemiologic Studies
Parasites
Sensitivity and Specificity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Parasitology
  • Infectious Diseases

Cite this

Gatti, S., Swierczynski, G., Robinson, F., Anselmi, M., Corrales, J., Moreira, J., ... Scaglia, M. (2002). Amebic infections due to the Entamoeba histolytica-Entamoeba dispar complex: A study of the incidence in a remote rural area of Ecuador. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 67(1), 123-127.

Amebic infections due to the Entamoeba histolytica-Entamoeba dispar complex : A study of the incidence in a remote rural area of Ecuador. / Gatti, Simonetta; Swierczynski, Giovanni; Robinson, Francisco; Anselmi, Mariella; Corrales, Javier; Moreira, Juan; Montalvo, Gregorio; Bruno, Antonella; Maserati, Roberta; Bisoffi, Zeno; Scaglia, Massimo.

In: American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, Vol. 67, No. 1, 07.2002, p. 123-127.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gatti, S, Swierczynski, G, Robinson, F, Anselmi, M, Corrales, J, Moreira, J, Montalvo, G, Bruno, A, Maserati, R, Bisoffi, Z & Scaglia, M 2002, 'Amebic infections due to the Entamoeba histolytica-Entamoeba dispar complex: A study of the incidence in a remote rural area of Ecuador', American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 123-127.
Gatti, Simonetta ; Swierczynski, Giovanni ; Robinson, Francisco ; Anselmi, Mariella ; Corrales, Javier ; Moreira, Juan ; Montalvo, Gregorio ; Bruno, Antonella ; Maserati, Roberta ; Bisoffi, Zeno ; Scaglia, Massimo. / Amebic infections due to the Entamoeba histolytica-Entamoeba dispar complex : A study of the incidence in a remote rural area of Ecuador. In: American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 2002 ; Vol. 67, No. 1. pp. 123-127.
@article{0d4908d18e5344cc83ea2d7630b09478,
title = "Amebic infections due to the Entamoeba histolytica-Entamoeba dispar complex: A study of the incidence in a remote rural area of Ecuador",
abstract = "An epidemiologic field study was conducted in the village of Borb{\`o}n in Esmeraldas province in northern Ecuador to compare different parasitologic methods in the diagnosis of infection with the Entamoeba histolytica/Entamoeba dispar complex. The results of two stool antigen detection assays (the Prospect™ Entamoeba histolytica microplate assay and the E. histolytica II™ assay) were compared with isoenzyme characterization of the amebic isolates. Nearly all (176 of 178, 98.9{\%}) subjects were positive for intestinal parasites on direct microscopic examination, and cysts and/or vegetative forms morphologically consistent with the E. histolytica/E dispar complex were recorded in 48 of 178 cases (27{\%}). Culture in Robinson's medium was positive for amebic stocks in 89 (50{\%}) of the 178 samples tested. Of the 37 isolates successfully stabilized, cloned, and characterized by zymodeme analysis, seven (18.9{\%}) showed isoenzyme patterns of E. histolytica, whereas 26 (70.3{\%}) showed patterns of E. dispar. The remaining four strains were identified as Entamoeba coli (three isolates; 8.1{\%}) and Dientamoeba fragilis (one strain; 2.7{\%}). The immunochromatographic tests showed different degrees of sensitivity and specificity when compared with isoenzyme characterization as the reference technique. The microplate assay, which does not discriminate between E. histolytica and E.dispar, showed a sensitivity of 54.5{\%} and a specificity of 94{\%} for both these amebic species. In contrast, the second-generation E. histolytica II test had a sensitivity of 14.3{\%} and a specificity of 98.4{\%} for E. histolytica sensu stricto. Our survey clearly demonstrated that more specific and sensitive diagnostic tests, such as stool antigen detection assays and isoenzyme analysis, are needed to establish the actual worldwide distribution of E. histolytica and E. dispar.",
author = "Simonetta Gatti and Giovanni Swierczynski and Francisco Robinson and Mariella Anselmi and Javier Corrales and Juan Moreira and Gregorio Montalvo and Antonella Bruno and Roberta Maserati and Zeno Bisoffi and Massimo Scaglia",
year = "2002",
month = "7",
language = "English",
volume = "67",
pages = "123--127",
journal = "American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene",
issn = "0002-9637",
publisher = "American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Amebic infections due to the Entamoeba histolytica-Entamoeba dispar complex

T2 - A study of the incidence in a remote rural area of Ecuador

AU - Gatti, Simonetta

AU - Swierczynski, Giovanni

AU - Robinson, Francisco

AU - Anselmi, Mariella

AU - Corrales, Javier

AU - Moreira, Juan

AU - Montalvo, Gregorio

AU - Bruno, Antonella

AU - Maserati, Roberta

AU - Bisoffi, Zeno

AU - Scaglia, Massimo

PY - 2002/7

Y1 - 2002/7

N2 - An epidemiologic field study was conducted in the village of Borbòn in Esmeraldas province in northern Ecuador to compare different parasitologic methods in the diagnosis of infection with the Entamoeba histolytica/Entamoeba dispar complex. The results of two stool antigen detection assays (the Prospect™ Entamoeba histolytica microplate assay and the E. histolytica II™ assay) were compared with isoenzyme characterization of the amebic isolates. Nearly all (176 of 178, 98.9%) subjects were positive for intestinal parasites on direct microscopic examination, and cysts and/or vegetative forms morphologically consistent with the E. histolytica/E dispar complex were recorded in 48 of 178 cases (27%). Culture in Robinson's medium was positive for amebic stocks in 89 (50%) of the 178 samples tested. Of the 37 isolates successfully stabilized, cloned, and characterized by zymodeme analysis, seven (18.9%) showed isoenzyme patterns of E. histolytica, whereas 26 (70.3%) showed patterns of E. dispar. The remaining four strains were identified as Entamoeba coli (three isolates; 8.1%) and Dientamoeba fragilis (one strain; 2.7%). The immunochromatographic tests showed different degrees of sensitivity and specificity when compared with isoenzyme characterization as the reference technique. The microplate assay, which does not discriminate between E. histolytica and E.dispar, showed a sensitivity of 54.5% and a specificity of 94% for both these amebic species. In contrast, the second-generation E. histolytica II test had a sensitivity of 14.3% and a specificity of 98.4% for E. histolytica sensu stricto. Our survey clearly demonstrated that more specific and sensitive diagnostic tests, such as stool antigen detection assays and isoenzyme analysis, are needed to establish the actual worldwide distribution of E. histolytica and E. dispar.

AB - An epidemiologic field study was conducted in the village of Borbòn in Esmeraldas province in northern Ecuador to compare different parasitologic methods in the diagnosis of infection with the Entamoeba histolytica/Entamoeba dispar complex. The results of two stool antigen detection assays (the Prospect™ Entamoeba histolytica microplate assay and the E. histolytica II™ assay) were compared with isoenzyme characterization of the amebic isolates. Nearly all (176 of 178, 98.9%) subjects were positive for intestinal parasites on direct microscopic examination, and cysts and/or vegetative forms morphologically consistent with the E. histolytica/E dispar complex were recorded in 48 of 178 cases (27%). Culture in Robinson's medium was positive for amebic stocks in 89 (50%) of the 178 samples tested. Of the 37 isolates successfully stabilized, cloned, and characterized by zymodeme analysis, seven (18.9%) showed isoenzyme patterns of E. histolytica, whereas 26 (70.3%) showed patterns of E. dispar. The remaining four strains were identified as Entamoeba coli (three isolates; 8.1%) and Dientamoeba fragilis (one strain; 2.7%). The immunochromatographic tests showed different degrees of sensitivity and specificity when compared with isoenzyme characterization as the reference technique. The microplate assay, which does not discriminate between E. histolytica and E.dispar, showed a sensitivity of 54.5% and a specificity of 94% for both these amebic species. In contrast, the second-generation E. histolytica II test had a sensitivity of 14.3% and a specificity of 98.4% for E. histolytica sensu stricto. Our survey clearly demonstrated that more specific and sensitive diagnostic tests, such as stool antigen detection assays and isoenzyme analysis, are needed to establish the actual worldwide distribution of E. histolytica and E. dispar.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036655663&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036655663&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 12363056

AN - SCOPUS:0036655663

VL - 67

SP - 123

EP - 127

JO - American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene

JF - American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene

SN - 0002-9637

IS - 1

ER -