An experiment on the feedback of the theta activity of the human EEG

W. Lutzenberger, N. Birbaumer, Ch Wildgruber

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Most of the reported studies on instrumental learning of EEG theta activity have not used appropriate experimental controls. General session effects have been uncontrolled and no experiment has employed an independent control group. Therefore, a controlled study was conducted to investigate the effect of contingent acoustic feedback on the EEG theta activity. 10 subjects participated in eleven one hour sessions (1 habituation session, 10 training sessions); a cross over design was applied; 5 subjects started with 5 sessions contingent feedback after a baseline session (CF, a soft pink noise on the right ear simultaneously with EEG activity of 3 to 7.8 Hz with a minimal amplitude of 10 uV) and continued with 5 sessions non contingent feedback (NCF, pink noise on the left ear in the sequence of the taperecorded feedback signals produced by the same S in the previous session); the remaining 5 subjects received the same treatment in the reversed order. After the 6th and 11th session both groups were shown an aversive movie and were simultaneously presented with either the 'noncontingent' feedback signal, or the 'contingent' signal, depending on group assignment. The whole experiment was run by an on line program on a PDP l ab 8/e computer, EEG, EOG, HR and subjective changes were recorded. A 'moving baseline' was used for computation of the results. The statistical analysis was made within and across the 10 subjects. There was no significant difference in any of the subjects between the CF and NCF condition or the test conditions (aversive movie). The methodological reasons for this negative result and the foregoing studies with positive outcome are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationEUR.J.BEHAV.ANAL.MODIF.
Pages119-126
Number of pages8
Volume1
Edition2
Publication statusPublished - 1975

Fingerprint

Human Activities
Electroencephalography
Motion Pictures
Ear
Neurofeedback
Electrooculography
Operant Conditioning
Acoustics
Cross-Over Studies
Control Groups
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Lutzenberger, W., Birbaumer, N., & Wildgruber, C. (1975). An experiment on the feedback of the theta activity of the human EEG. In EUR.J.BEHAV.ANAL.MODIF. (2 ed., Vol. 1, pp. 119-126)

An experiment on the feedback of the theta activity of the human EEG. / Lutzenberger, W.; Birbaumer, N.; Wildgruber, Ch.

EUR.J.BEHAV.ANAL.MODIF.. Vol. 1 2. ed. 1975. p. 119-126.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Lutzenberger, W, Birbaumer, N & Wildgruber, C 1975, An experiment on the feedback of the theta activity of the human EEG. in EUR.J.BEHAV.ANAL.MODIF.. 2 edn, vol. 1, pp. 119-126.
Lutzenberger W, Birbaumer N, Wildgruber C. An experiment on the feedback of the theta activity of the human EEG. In EUR.J.BEHAV.ANAL.MODIF.. 2 ed. Vol. 1. 1975. p. 119-126
Lutzenberger, W. ; Birbaumer, N. ; Wildgruber, Ch. / An experiment on the feedback of the theta activity of the human EEG. EUR.J.BEHAV.ANAL.MODIF.. Vol. 1 2. ed. 1975. pp. 119-126
@inbook{26de4a65611c4efcb25a83ba18c9b801,
title = "An experiment on the feedback of the theta activity of the human EEG",
abstract = "Most of the reported studies on instrumental learning of EEG theta activity have not used appropriate experimental controls. General session effects have been uncontrolled and no experiment has employed an independent control group. Therefore, a controlled study was conducted to investigate the effect of contingent acoustic feedback on the EEG theta activity. 10 subjects participated in eleven one hour sessions (1 habituation session, 10 training sessions); a cross over design was applied; 5 subjects started with 5 sessions contingent feedback after a baseline session (CF, a soft pink noise on the right ear simultaneously with EEG activity of 3 to 7.8 Hz with a minimal amplitude of 10 uV) and continued with 5 sessions non contingent feedback (NCF, pink noise on the left ear in the sequence of the taperecorded feedback signals produced by the same S in the previous session); the remaining 5 subjects received the same treatment in the reversed order. After the 6th and 11th session both groups were shown an aversive movie and were simultaneously presented with either the 'noncontingent' feedback signal, or the 'contingent' signal, depending on group assignment. The whole experiment was run by an on line program on a PDP l ab 8/e computer, EEG, EOG, HR and subjective changes were recorded. A 'moving baseline' was used for computation of the results. The statistical analysis was made within and across the 10 subjects. There was no significant difference in any of the subjects between the CF and NCF condition or the test conditions (aversive movie). The methodological reasons for this negative result and the foregoing studies with positive outcome are discussed.",
author = "W. Lutzenberger and N. Birbaumer and Ch Wildgruber",
year = "1975",
language = "English",
volume = "1",
pages = "119--126",
booktitle = "EUR.J.BEHAV.ANAL.MODIF.",
edition = "2",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - An experiment on the feedback of the theta activity of the human EEG

AU - Lutzenberger, W.

AU - Birbaumer, N.

AU - Wildgruber, Ch

PY - 1975

Y1 - 1975

N2 - Most of the reported studies on instrumental learning of EEG theta activity have not used appropriate experimental controls. General session effects have been uncontrolled and no experiment has employed an independent control group. Therefore, a controlled study was conducted to investigate the effect of contingent acoustic feedback on the EEG theta activity. 10 subjects participated in eleven one hour sessions (1 habituation session, 10 training sessions); a cross over design was applied; 5 subjects started with 5 sessions contingent feedback after a baseline session (CF, a soft pink noise on the right ear simultaneously with EEG activity of 3 to 7.8 Hz with a minimal amplitude of 10 uV) and continued with 5 sessions non contingent feedback (NCF, pink noise on the left ear in the sequence of the taperecorded feedback signals produced by the same S in the previous session); the remaining 5 subjects received the same treatment in the reversed order. After the 6th and 11th session both groups were shown an aversive movie and were simultaneously presented with either the 'noncontingent' feedback signal, or the 'contingent' signal, depending on group assignment. The whole experiment was run by an on line program on a PDP l ab 8/e computer, EEG, EOG, HR and subjective changes were recorded. A 'moving baseline' was used for computation of the results. The statistical analysis was made within and across the 10 subjects. There was no significant difference in any of the subjects between the CF and NCF condition or the test conditions (aversive movie). The methodological reasons for this negative result and the foregoing studies with positive outcome are discussed.

AB - Most of the reported studies on instrumental learning of EEG theta activity have not used appropriate experimental controls. General session effects have been uncontrolled and no experiment has employed an independent control group. Therefore, a controlled study was conducted to investigate the effect of contingent acoustic feedback on the EEG theta activity. 10 subjects participated in eleven one hour sessions (1 habituation session, 10 training sessions); a cross over design was applied; 5 subjects started with 5 sessions contingent feedback after a baseline session (CF, a soft pink noise on the right ear simultaneously with EEG activity of 3 to 7.8 Hz with a minimal amplitude of 10 uV) and continued with 5 sessions non contingent feedback (NCF, pink noise on the left ear in the sequence of the taperecorded feedback signals produced by the same S in the previous session); the remaining 5 subjects received the same treatment in the reversed order. After the 6th and 11th session both groups were shown an aversive movie and were simultaneously presented with either the 'noncontingent' feedback signal, or the 'contingent' signal, depending on group assignment. The whole experiment was run by an on line program on a PDP l ab 8/e computer, EEG, EOG, HR and subjective changes were recorded. A 'moving baseline' was used for computation of the results. The statistical analysis was made within and across the 10 subjects. There was no significant difference in any of the subjects between the CF and NCF condition or the test conditions (aversive movie). The methodological reasons for this negative result and the foregoing studies with positive outcome are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0016630608&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0016630608&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Chapter

VL - 1

SP - 119

EP - 126

BT - EUR.J.BEHAV.ANAL.MODIF.

ER -