An International survey on diagnostic and prognostic protocols in patients with disorder of consciousness

on behalf of IBIA DoC-SIG

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

To date, no international guidelines or recommendations for diagnosis or prognosis of patients with disorders of consciousness (DoC) have been established. The International Brain Injury Association’s (IBIA) Special Interest Group on Disorders of Consciousness (DoC-SIG) launched an international multicenter survey to compare diagnostic and prognostic procedures across countries and clinical settings. Objectives: To explore which specific diagnostic protocols and prognostic indices were utilized in the care for persons with DoC in different countries and to determine the usage, if any, of national guidelines in the care of such patients. Methods: The questionnaire included 17 questions in two distinct sections (I–clinical and instrumental tools and involvement of caregivers and II–clinical, anamnestic and instrumental markers). Results: Physicians composed 50% of the survey respondents (120) and were all involved in post-acute rehabilitation care. In the majority of countries, respondents reported that there were no national guidelines or recommendations for DoC care. The Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) and the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R) were the most frequently used clinical scales for diagnostic purposes. The majority of respondents reported the involvement of caregivers in the evaluation of behavioral responsiveness of patient with DoC. The survey indicated that only a few centers performed neurophysiological investigations routinely as diagnostic instrumental procedures. Our results suggest that international guidelines and recommendations for the care of persons with DoC still need to be formulated and ideally agreed to by consensus.

Original languageEnglish
JournalBrain Injury
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Consciousness Disorders
Guidelines
Caregivers
Subacute Care
Glasgow Coma Scale
Public Opinion
Coma
Surveys and Questionnaires
Consciousness
Brain Injuries
Consensus
Patient Care
Rehabilitation
Physicians

Keywords

  • Disorder of consciousness
  • disorders of consciousness special interest group
  • International brain injury association

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience (miscellaneous)
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

An International survey on diagnostic and prognostic protocols in patients with disorder of consciousness. / on behalf of IBIA DoC-SIG.

In: Brain Injury, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{102319388fb94e568959d97d00a241e7,
title = "An International survey on diagnostic and prognostic protocols in patients with disorder of consciousness",
abstract = "To date, no international guidelines or recommendations for diagnosis or prognosis of patients with disorders of consciousness (DoC) have been established. The International Brain Injury Association’s (IBIA) Special Interest Group on Disorders of Consciousness (DoC-SIG) launched an international multicenter survey to compare diagnostic and prognostic procedures across countries and clinical settings. Objectives: To explore which specific diagnostic protocols and prognostic indices were utilized in the care for persons with DoC in different countries and to determine the usage, if any, of national guidelines in the care of such patients. Methods: The questionnaire included 17 questions in two distinct sections (I–clinical and instrumental tools and involvement of caregivers and II–clinical, anamnestic and instrumental markers). Results: Physicians composed 50{\%} of the survey respondents (120) and were all involved in post-acute rehabilitation care. In the majority of countries, respondents reported that there were no national guidelines or recommendations for DoC care. The Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) and the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R) were the most frequently used clinical scales for diagnostic purposes. The majority of respondents reported the involvement of caregivers in the evaluation of behavioral responsiveness of patient with DoC. The survey indicated that only a few centers performed neurophysiological investigations routinely as diagnostic instrumental procedures. Our results suggest that international guidelines and recommendations for the care of persons with DoC still need to be formulated and ideally agreed to by consensus.",
keywords = "Disorder of consciousness, disorders of consciousness special interest group, International brain injury association",
author = "{on behalf of IBIA DoC-SIG} and Rita Formisano and Marco Giustini and Marta Aloisi and Marianna Contrada and Caroline Schnakers and Nathan Zasler and Anna Estraneo",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/02699052.2019.1622785",
language = "English",
journal = "Brain Injury",
issn = "0269-9052",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An International survey on diagnostic and prognostic protocols in patients with disorder of consciousness

AU - on behalf of IBIA DoC-SIG

AU - Formisano, Rita

AU - Giustini, Marco

AU - Aloisi, Marta

AU - Contrada, Marianna

AU - Schnakers, Caroline

AU - Zasler, Nathan

AU - Estraneo, Anna

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - To date, no international guidelines or recommendations for diagnosis or prognosis of patients with disorders of consciousness (DoC) have been established. The International Brain Injury Association’s (IBIA) Special Interest Group on Disorders of Consciousness (DoC-SIG) launched an international multicenter survey to compare diagnostic and prognostic procedures across countries and clinical settings. Objectives: To explore which specific diagnostic protocols and prognostic indices were utilized in the care for persons with DoC in different countries and to determine the usage, if any, of national guidelines in the care of such patients. Methods: The questionnaire included 17 questions in two distinct sections (I–clinical and instrumental tools and involvement of caregivers and II–clinical, anamnestic and instrumental markers). Results: Physicians composed 50% of the survey respondents (120) and were all involved in post-acute rehabilitation care. In the majority of countries, respondents reported that there were no national guidelines or recommendations for DoC care. The Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) and the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R) were the most frequently used clinical scales for diagnostic purposes. The majority of respondents reported the involvement of caregivers in the evaluation of behavioral responsiveness of patient with DoC. The survey indicated that only a few centers performed neurophysiological investigations routinely as diagnostic instrumental procedures. Our results suggest that international guidelines and recommendations for the care of persons with DoC still need to be formulated and ideally agreed to by consensus.

AB - To date, no international guidelines or recommendations for diagnosis or prognosis of patients with disorders of consciousness (DoC) have been established. The International Brain Injury Association’s (IBIA) Special Interest Group on Disorders of Consciousness (DoC-SIG) launched an international multicenter survey to compare diagnostic and prognostic procedures across countries and clinical settings. Objectives: To explore which specific diagnostic protocols and prognostic indices were utilized in the care for persons with DoC in different countries and to determine the usage, if any, of national guidelines in the care of such patients. Methods: The questionnaire included 17 questions in two distinct sections (I–clinical and instrumental tools and involvement of caregivers and II–clinical, anamnestic and instrumental markers). Results: Physicians composed 50% of the survey respondents (120) and were all involved in post-acute rehabilitation care. In the majority of countries, respondents reported that there were no national guidelines or recommendations for DoC care. The Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) and the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R) were the most frequently used clinical scales for diagnostic purposes. The majority of respondents reported the involvement of caregivers in the evaluation of behavioral responsiveness of patient with DoC. The survey indicated that only a few centers performed neurophysiological investigations routinely as diagnostic instrumental procedures. Our results suggest that international guidelines and recommendations for the care of persons with DoC still need to be formulated and ideally agreed to by consensus.

KW - Disorder of consciousness

KW - disorders of consciousness special interest group

KW - International brain injury association

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85066846906&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85066846906&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/02699052.2019.1622785

DO - 10.1080/02699052.2019.1622785

M3 - Article

JO - Brain Injury

JF - Brain Injury

SN - 0269-9052

ER -