An overview of different health indicators used in the European Health Systems

M. Gaeta, F. Campanella, L. Capasso, G. M. Schifino, L. Gentile, G. Banfi, G. Pelissero, C. Ricci

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction. In the European Union three different health systems could be defined according to service delivery, financing, and economic policies: Beveridge, Bismarck and Mixed system. Although health systems are hardly to compare, various organizations are developing methods assessing performance. In the present work the performance of the three systems were evaluated using European Community Health Indicators according to Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Methods. The study has been conducted among the 28 states of the European Union using the following indicators: Standardized death rate for diseases of the circulatory system, standardized death rate of malignant neoplasms, road traffic accidents with injury, life expectancy at birth, incidence of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), infant deaths, pure alcohol consumption, infants vaccinated against Diphtheria Tetanus Pertussis (DTP), public and total expenditure on health over the period 2001-2010. Results. The variation of health indicators over the observational time shows similar trend of circulatory system diseases and malignant neoplasms death rates, road accidents with injury, infant deaths, life expectancy at birth, public and total health expenditure. Some differences in the trend of HIV incidence, alcohol intake and DTP vaccination rates arise among systems. Grouping countries by health system paradigm and geographical area, resulted in a relevant heterogeneity (I2 ≥ 90%, Pvalue < 0.0001). No clear superiority of a given health delivery system was found with respect to other paradigms. Conclusions. In accordance with the evidence of our study, it can be stated that best performances are more likely to be linked to country specific economic factors. In conclusion, it was not possible to identify the best health system model.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)E114-E120
JournalJournal of Preventive Medicine and Hygiene
Volume58
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - Jan 1 2017

Fingerprint

Health
European Union
Diphtheria
Whooping Cough
Tetanus
Health Expenditures
Cardiovascular System
Life Expectancy
Mortality
Economics
HIV
Parturition
Traffic Accidents
Incidence
Wounds and Injuries
Alcohol Drinking
Accidents
Neoplasms
Vaccination
Public Health

Keywords

  • Europe
  • Health care performance
  • Health indicators
  • Health systems

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Infectious Diseases

Cite this

Gaeta, M., Campanella, F., Capasso, L., Schifino, G. M., Gentile, L., Banfi, G., ... Ricci, C. (2017). An overview of different health indicators used in the European Health Systems. Journal of Preventive Medicine and Hygiene, 58(2), E114-E120.

An overview of different health indicators used in the European Health Systems. / Gaeta, M.; Campanella, F.; Capasso, L.; Schifino, G. M.; Gentile, L.; Banfi, G.; Pelissero, G.; Ricci, C.

In: Journal of Preventive Medicine and Hygiene, Vol. 58, No. 2, 01.01.2017, p. E114-E120.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gaeta, M, Campanella, F, Capasso, L, Schifino, GM, Gentile, L, Banfi, G, Pelissero, G & Ricci, C 2017, 'An overview of different health indicators used in the European Health Systems', Journal of Preventive Medicine and Hygiene, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. E114-E120.
Gaeta M, Campanella F, Capasso L, Schifino GM, Gentile L, Banfi G et al. An overview of different health indicators used in the European Health Systems. Journal of Preventive Medicine and Hygiene. 2017 Jan 1;58(2):E114-E120.
Gaeta, M. ; Campanella, F. ; Capasso, L. ; Schifino, G. M. ; Gentile, L. ; Banfi, G. ; Pelissero, G. ; Ricci, C. / An overview of different health indicators used in the European Health Systems. In: Journal of Preventive Medicine and Hygiene. 2017 ; Vol. 58, No. 2. pp. E114-E120.
@article{c3b85636dfbf461db96109c247da6d4c,
title = "An overview of different health indicators used in the European Health Systems",
abstract = "Introduction. In the European Union three different health systems could be defined according to service delivery, financing, and economic policies: Beveridge, Bismarck and Mixed system. Although health systems are hardly to compare, various organizations are developing methods assessing performance. In the present work the performance of the three systems were evaluated using European Community Health Indicators according to Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Methods. The study has been conducted among the 28 states of the European Union using the following indicators: Standardized death rate for diseases of the circulatory system, standardized death rate of malignant neoplasms, road traffic accidents with injury, life expectancy at birth, incidence of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), infant deaths, pure alcohol consumption, infants vaccinated against Diphtheria Tetanus Pertussis (DTP), public and total expenditure on health over the period 2001-2010. Results. The variation of health indicators over the observational time shows similar trend of circulatory system diseases and malignant neoplasms death rates, road accidents with injury, infant deaths, life expectancy at birth, public and total health expenditure. Some differences in the trend of HIV incidence, alcohol intake and DTP vaccination rates arise among systems. Grouping countries by health system paradigm and geographical area, resulted in a relevant heterogeneity (I2 ≥ 90{\%}, Pvalue < 0.0001). No clear superiority of a given health delivery system was found with respect to other paradigms. Conclusions. In accordance with the evidence of our study, it can be stated that best performances are more likely to be linked to country specific economic factors. In conclusion, it was not possible to identify the best health system model.",
keywords = "Europe, Health care performance, Health indicators, Health systems",
author = "M. Gaeta and F. Campanella and L. Capasso and Schifino, {G. M.} and L. Gentile and G. Banfi and G. Pelissero and C. Ricci",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "58",
pages = "E114--E120",
journal = "Journal of Preventive Medicine and Hygiene",
issn = "1121-2233",
publisher = "Pacini Editore s.r.l.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An overview of different health indicators used in the European Health Systems

AU - Gaeta, M.

AU - Campanella, F.

AU - Capasso, L.

AU - Schifino, G. M.

AU - Gentile, L.

AU - Banfi, G.

AU - Pelissero, G.

AU - Ricci, C.

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Introduction. In the European Union three different health systems could be defined according to service delivery, financing, and economic policies: Beveridge, Bismarck and Mixed system. Although health systems are hardly to compare, various organizations are developing methods assessing performance. In the present work the performance of the three systems were evaluated using European Community Health Indicators according to Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Methods. The study has been conducted among the 28 states of the European Union using the following indicators: Standardized death rate for diseases of the circulatory system, standardized death rate of malignant neoplasms, road traffic accidents with injury, life expectancy at birth, incidence of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), infant deaths, pure alcohol consumption, infants vaccinated against Diphtheria Tetanus Pertussis (DTP), public and total expenditure on health over the period 2001-2010. Results. The variation of health indicators over the observational time shows similar trend of circulatory system diseases and malignant neoplasms death rates, road accidents with injury, infant deaths, life expectancy at birth, public and total health expenditure. Some differences in the trend of HIV incidence, alcohol intake and DTP vaccination rates arise among systems. Grouping countries by health system paradigm and geographical area, resulted in a relevant heterogeneity (I2 ≥ 90%, Pvalue < 0.0001). No clear superiority of a given health delivery system was found with respect to other paradigms. Conclusions. In accordance with the evidence of our study, it can be stated that best performances are more likely to be linked to country specific economic factors. In conclusion, it was not possible to identify the best health system model.

AB - Introduction. In the European Union three different health systems could be defined according to service delivery, financing, and economic policies: Beveridge, Bismarck and Mixed system. Although health systems are hardly to compare, various organizations are developing methods assessing performance. In the present work the performance of the three systems were evaluated using European Community Health Indicators according to Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Methods. The study has been conducted among the 28 states of the European Union using the following indicators: Standardized death rate for diseases of the circulatory system, standardized death rate of malignant neoplasms, road traffic accidents with injury, life expectancy at birth, incidence of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), infant deaths, pure alcohol consumption, infants vaccinated against Diphtheria Tetanus Pertussis (DTP), public and total expenditure on health over the period 2001-2010. Results. The variation of health indicators over the observational time shows similar trend of circulatory system diseases and malignant neoplasms death rates, road accidents with injury, infant deaths, life expectancy at birth, public and total health expenditure. Some differences in the trend of HIV incidence, alcohol intake and DTP vaccination rates arise among systems. Grouping countries by health system paradigm and geographical area, resulted in a relevant heterogeneity (I2 ≥ 90%, Pvalue < 0.0001). No clear superiority of a given health delivery system was found with respect to other paradigms. Conclusions. In accordance with the evidence of our study, it can be stated that best performances are more likely to be linked to country specific economic factors. In conclusion, it was not possible to identify the best health system model.

KW - Europe

KW - Health care performance

KW - Health indicators

KW - Health systems

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85021836112&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85021836112&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85021836112

VL - 58

SP - E114-E120

JO - Journal of Preventive Medicine and Hygiene

JF - Journal of Preventive Medicine and Hygiene

SN - 1121-2233

IS - 2

ER -