Anaesthesia in transrectal prostate biopsy: Which is the most effective technique?

Carmen MacCagnano, Vincenzo Scattoni, Marco Roscigno, Marco Raber, Diego Angiolilli, Francesco Montorsi, Patrizio Rigatti

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Prostate biopsy (PBx) techniques have changed significantly since the original Hodge's scheme, with an increase in the number and location of cores. These improvements have been realized in part because of the introduction of different local anaesthesia techniques. We critically analysed the literature discussing the role of anaesthesia techniques for use during PBx to find which technique provides the best pain relief for the patient and safety for the urologist. Methods: We performed a literature review by searching the Medline database for articles published between January 2000 and March 2010. Electronic searches were limited to the keywords 'transrectal prostate biopsy' and 'anaesthesia'. Results: Pain and discomfort perceived during PBx are the result of different anatomic factors: the introduction to and movement of the transrectal ultrasound probe in the rectum and the needle piercing the rectum and the prostate capsule. The anaesthesia techniques currently available can be divided into two groups: local (i.e. intrarectal lubricant agents, periprostatic nerve blocks, caudal blocks, pudendal nerve blocks, and their different combinations) and systemic (i.e. oral/intravenous drug administration and sedoanalgesia). Conclusions: The most effective anaesthesia technique for transrectal PBx performed in outpatient settings is the periprostatic nerve blocks with 1 or 2% lidocaine 10 ml, which is associated with intrarectal lubricant agents, especially in younger people. Nevertheless, the current choice of the anaesthesia technique still depends both on patient characteristics (age, prostate size, number and location of cores, anxious personality, need for re-biopsy) and, above all, the urologist's experience and habits.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-13
Number of pages13
JournalUrologia Internationalis
Volume87
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2011

Fingerprint

Prostate
Anesthesia
Nerve Block
Biopsy
Lubricants
Rectum
Pudendal Nerve
Pain
Local Anesthesia
Patient Safety
Lidocaine
Intravenous Administration
Habits
Capsules
Needles
Oral Administration
Personality
Outpatients
Databases
Urologists

Keywords

  • Anaesthesia
  • Prostate biopsy
  • Transrectal ultrasound

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

MacCagnano, C., Scattoni, V., Roscigno, M., Raber, M., Angiolilli, D., Montorsi, F., & Rigatti, P. (2011). Anaesthesia in transrectal prostate biopsy: Which is the most effective technique? Urologia Internationalis, 87(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1159/000327827

Anaesthesia in transrectal prostate biopsy : Which is the most effective technique? / MacCagnano, Carmen; Scattoni, Vincenzo; Roscigno, Marco; Raber, Marco; Angiolilli, Diego; Montorsi, Francesco; Rigatti, Patrizio.

In: Urologia Internationalis, Vol. 87, No. 1, 08.2011, p. 1-13.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

MacCagnano, C, Scattoni, V, Roscigno, M, Raber, M, Angiolilli, D, Montorsi, F & Rigatti, P 2011, 'Anaesthesia in transrectal prostate biopsy: Which is the most effective technique?', Urologia Internationalis, vol. 87, no. 1, pp. 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1159/000327827
MacCagnano, Carmen ; Scattoni, Vincenzo ; Roscigno, Marco ; Raber, Marco ; Angiolilli, Diego ; Montorsi, Francesco ; Rigatti, Patrizio. / Anaesthesia in transrectal prostate biopsy : Which is the most effective technique?. In: Urologia Internationalis. 2011 ; Vol. 87, No. 1. pp. 1-13.
@article{a7d262c5a13743c89aeb6328621b618e,
title = "Anaesthesia in transrectal prostate biopsy: Which is the most effective technique?",
abstract = "Background: Prostate biopsy (PBx) techniques have changed significantly since the original Hodge's scheme, with an increase in the number and location of cores. These improvements have been realized in part because of the introduction of different local anaesthesia techniques. We critically analysed the literature discussing the role of anaesthesia techniques for use during PBx to find which technique provides the best pain relief for the patient and safety for the urologist. Methods: We performed a literature review by searching the Medline database for articles published between January 2000 and March 2010. Electronic searches were limited to the keywords 'transrectal prostate biopsy' and 'anaesthesia'. Results: Pain and discomfort perceived during PBx are the result of different anatomic factors: the introduction to and movement of the transrectal ultrasound probe in the rectum and the needle piercing the rectum and the prostate capsule. The anaesthesia techniques currently available can be divided into two groups: local (i.e. intrarectal lubricant agents, periprostatic nerve blocks, caudal blocks, pudendal nerve blocks, and their different combinations) and systemic (i.e. oral/intravenous drug administration and sedoanalgesia). Conclusions: The most effective anaesthesia technique for transrectal PBx performed in outpatient settings is the periprostatic nerve blocks with 1 or 2{\%} lidocaine 10 ml, which is associated with intrarectal lubricant agents, especially in younger people. Nevertheless, the current choice of the anaesthesia technique still depends both on patient characteristics (age, prostate size, number and location of cores, anxious personality, need for re-biopsy) and, above all, the urologist's experience and habits.",
keywords = "Anaesthesia, Prostate biopsy, Transrectal ultrasound",
author = "Carmen MacCagnano and Vincenzo Scattoni and Marco Roscigno and Marco Raber and Diego Angiolilli and Francesco Montorsi and Patrizio Rigatti",
year = "2011",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1159/000327827",
language = "English",
volume = "87",
pages = "1--13",
journal = "Urologia Internationalis",
issn = "0042-1138",
publisher = "S. Karger AG",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Anaesthesia in transrectal prostate biopsy

T2 - Which is the most effective technique?

AU - MacCagnano, Carmen

AU - Scattoni, Vincenzo

AU - Roscigno, Marco

AU - Raber, Marco

AU - Angiolilli, Diego

AU - Montorsi, Francesco

AU - Rigatti, Patrizio

PY - 2011/8

Y1 - 2011/8

N2 - Background: Prostate biopsy (PBx) techniques have changed significantly since the original Hodge's scheme, with an increase in the number and location of cores. These improvements have been realized in part because of the introduction of different local anaesthesia techniques. We critically analysed the literature discussing the role of anaesthesia techniques for use during PBx to find which technique provides the best pain relief for the patient and safety for the urologist. Methods: We performed a literature review by searching the Medline database for articles published between January 2000 and March 2010. Electronic searches were limited to the keywords 'transrectal prostate biopsy' and 'anaesthesia'. Results: Pain and discomfort perceived during PBx are the result of different anatomic factors: the introduction to and movement of the transrectal ultrasound probe in the rectum and the needle piercing the rectum and the prostate capsule. The anaesthesia techniques currently available can be divided into two groups: local (i.e. intrarectal lubricant agents, periprostatic nerve blocks, caudal blocks, pudendal nerve blocks, and their different combinations) and systemic (i.e. oral/intravenous drug administration and sedoanalgesia). Conclusions: The most effective anaesthesia technique for transrectal PBx performed in outpatient settings is the periprostatic nerve blocks with 1 or 2% lidocaine 10 ml, which is associated with intrarectal lubricant agents, especially in younger people. Nevertheless, the current choice of the anaesthesia technique still depends both on patient characteristics (age, prostate size, number and location of cores, anxious personality, need for re-biopsy) and, above all, the urologist's experience and habits.

AB - Background: Prostate biopsy (PBx) techniques have changed significantly since the original Hodge's scheme, with an increase in the number and location of cores. These improvements have been realized in part because of the introduction of different local anaesthesia techniques. We critically analysed the literature discussing the role of anaesthesia techniques for use during PBx to find which technique provides the best pain relief for the patient and safety for the urologist. Methods: We performed a literature review by searching the Medline database for articles published between January 2000 and March 2010. Electronic searches were limited to the keywords 'transrectal prostate biopsy' and 'anaesthesia'. Results: Pain and discomfort perceived during PBx are the result of different anatomic factors: the introduction to and movement of the transrectal ultrasound probe in the rectum and the needle piercing the rectum and the prostate capsule. The anaesthesia techniques currently available can be divided into two groups: local (i.e. intrarectal lubricant agents, periprostatic nerve blocks, caudal blocks, pudendal nerve blocks, and their different combinations) and systemic (i.e. oral/intravenous drug administration and sedoanalgesia). Conclusions: The most effective anaesthesia technique for transrectal PBx performed in outpatient settings is the periprostatic nerve blocks with 1 or 2% lidocaine 10 ml, which is associated with intrarectal lubricant agents, especially in younger people. Nevertheless, the current choice of the anaesthesia technique still depends both on patient characteristics (age, prostate size, number and location of cores, anxious personality, need for re-biopsy) and, above all, the urologist's experience and habits.

KW - Anaesthesia

KW - Prostate biopsy

KW - Transrectal ultrasound

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80051781162&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80051781162&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1159/000327827

DO - 10.1159/000327827

M3 - Article

C2 - 21677420

AN - SCOPUS:80051781162

VL - 87

SP - 1

EP - 13

JO - Urologia Internationalis

JF - Urologia Internationalis

SN - 0042-1138

IS - 1

ER -