Analysis of propofol/remifentanil infusion protocol for tumor surgery with intraoperative brain mapping

Valeria Conte, Lorenzo Magni, Valeria Songa, Paola Tomaselli, Laura Ghisoni, Sandra Magnoni, Lorenzo Bello, Nino Stocchetti

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is no general consensus about the best anesthesiologic approach to use during craniotomies with intraoperative brain mapping, and large prospective studies evaluating the complications associated with different approaches are lacking. Objective of this study was to prospectively collect and evaluate data about a large series of consecutive asleep-awake and asleep-asleep craniotomies. METHODS: We analyzed 238 consecutive procedures from January 2005 to December 2008. During asleep-awake procedures, patients were initially ventilated through a laryngeal mask which was removed to allow language testing. During asleep-asleep procedures, patients remained sedated and intubated to permit motor testing. RESULTS: In asleep-awake craniotomies [n = 135, age 42y (range: 16 to 72y), American Society of Anesthologists classification (ASA) 1 (1 to 3), and body mass index 24.2 ± 3.7 kg/m 2], 43% of the procedures were free of complications. Most common complications were hypertension (27%) and brief clinical seizures (16%), but also hypotension (10%), vomiting (7%), brief periods of apnea (4%), and agitation (6%) were observed. In 7% of the procedures, seizures required pharmacologic treatment. Fifty-nine percent of the asleep-asleep procedures [n=103, age 51y (range: 21 to 76y), ASA 1 (1 to 3), body mass index 25.4 ± 3.9kg/m2, P <0.05 vs. asleep-awake] were free of complications. Clinical seizures were observed in 31% of the cases. The administration of boluses of hypnotics was rarely necessary (6%) and safer because of secured airways. CONCLUSIONS: With this study, we demonstrated the feasibility and safety of our protocols on large prospective case series. Asleep-awake protocol can be safely used when intraoperative language mapping is planned, whereas an asleep-asleep protocol with secured airway might be preferred when motor testing only is required.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)119-127
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Neurosurgical Anesthesiology
Volume22
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2010

Fingerprint

Brain Mapping
Propofol
Craniotomy
Neoplasms
Seizures
Body Mass Index
Language
Laryngeal Masks
Feasibility Studies
Apnea
Hypnotics and Sedatives
Hypotension
Vomiting
remifentanil
Consensus
Prospective Studies
Hypertension
Safety

Keywords

  • Awake craniotomy
  • Neurophysiologic monitoring
  • Total intravenous anesthesia

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Surgery

Cite this

Analysis of propofol/remifentanil infusion protocol for tumor surgery with intraoperative brain mapping. / Conte, Valeria; Magni, Lorenzo; Songa, Valeria; Tomaselli, Paola; Ghisoni, Laura; Magnoni, Sandra; Bello, Lorenzo; Stocchetti, Nino.

In: Journal of Neurosurgical Anesthesiology, Vol. 22, No. 2, 04.2010, p. 119-127.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Conte, Valeria ; Magni, Lorenzo ; Songa, Valeria ; Tomaselli, Paola ; Ghisoni, Laura ; Magnoni, Sandra ; Bello, Lorenzo ; Stocchetti, Nino. / Analysis of propofol/remifentanil infusion protocol for tumor surgery with intraoperative brain mapping. In: Journal of Neurosurgical Anesthesiology. 2010 ; Vol. 22, No. 2. pp. 119-127.
@article{56962776c33b4e71b2e84e004ac70576,
title = "Analysis of propofol/remifentanil infusion protocol for tumor surgery with intraoperative brain mapping",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: There is no general consensus about the best anesthesiologic approach to use during craniotomies with intraoperative brain mapping, and large prospective studies evaluating the complications associated with different approaches are lacking. Objective of this study was to prospectively collect and evaluate data about a large series of consecutive asleep-awake and asleep-asleep craniotomies. METHODS: We analyzed 238 consecutive procedures from January 2005 to December 2008. During asleep-awake procedures, patients were initially ventilated through a laryngeal mask which was removed to allow language testing. During asleep-asleep procedures, patients remained sedated and intubated to permit motor testing. RESULTS: In asleep-awake craniotomies [n = 135, age 42y (range: 16 to 72y), American Society of Anesthologists classification (ASA) 1 (1 to 3), and body mass index 24.2 ± 3.7 kg/m 2], 43{\%} of the procedures were free of complications. Most common complications were hypertension (27{\%}) and brief clinical seizures (16{\%}), but also hypotension (10{\%}), vomiting (7{\%}), brief periods of apnea (4{\%}), and agitation (6{\%}) were observed. In 7{\%} of the procedures, seizures required pharmacologic treatment. Fifty-nine percent of the asleep-asleep procedures [n=103, age 51y (range: 21 to 76y), ASA 1 (1 to 3), body mass index 25.4 ± 3.9kg/m2, P <0.05 vs. asleep-awake] were free of complications. Clinical seizures were observed in 31{\%} of the cases. The administration of boluses of hypnotics was rarely necessary (6{\%}) and safer because of secured airways. CONCLUSIONS: With this study, we demonstrated the feasibility and safety of our protocols on large prospective case series. Asleep-awake protocol can be safely used when intraoperative language mapping is planned, whereas an asleep-asleep protocol with secured airway might be preferred when motor testing only is required.",
keywords = "Awake craniotomy, Neurophysiologic monitoring, Total intravenous anesthesia",
author = "Valeria Conte and Lorenzo Magni and Valeria Songa and Paola Tomaselli and Laura Ghisoni and Sandra Magnoni and Lorenzo Bello and Nino Stocchetti",
year = "2010",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1097/ANA.0b013e3181c959f4",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "119--127",
journal = "Journal of Neurosurgical Anesthesiology",
issn = "0898-4921",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Analysis of propofol/remifentanil infusion protocol for tumor surgery with intraoperative brain mapping

AU - Conte, Valeria

AU - Magni, Lorenzo

AU - Songa, Valeria

AU - Tomaselli, Paola

AU - Ghisoni, Laura

AU - Magnoni, Sandra

AU - Bello, Lorenzo

AU - Stocchetti, Nino

PY - 2010/4

Y1 - 2010/4

N2 - BACKGROUND: There is no general consensus about the best anesthesiologic approach to use during craniotomies with intraoperative brain mapping, and large prospective studies evaluating the complications associated with different approaches are lacking. Objective of this study was to prospectively collect and evaluate data about a large series of consecutive asleep-awake and asleep-asleep craniotomies. METHODS: We analyzed 238 consecutive procedures from January 2005 to December 2008. During asleep-awake procedures, patients were initially ventilated through a laryngeal mask which was removed to allow language testing. During asleep-asleep procedures, patients remained sedated and intubated to permit motor testing. RESULTS: In asleep-awake craniotomies [n = 135, age 42y (range: 16 to 72y), American Society of Anesthologists classification (ASA) 1 (1 to 3), and body mass index 24.2 ± 3.7 kg/m 2], 43% of the procedures were free of complications. Most common complications were hypertension (27%) and brief clinical seizures (16%), but also hypotension (10%), vomiting (7%), brief periods of apnea (4%), and agitation (6%) were observed. In 7% of the procedures, seizures required pharmacologic treatment. Fifty-nine percent of the asleep-asleep procedures [n=103, age 51y (range: 21 to 76y), ASA 1 (1 to 3), body mass index 25.4 ± 3.9kg/m2, P <0.05 vs. asleep-awake] were free of complications. Clinical seizures were observed in 31% of the cases. The administration of boluses of hypnotics was rarely necessary (6%) and safer because of secured airways. CONCLUSIONS: With this study, we demonstrated the feasibility and safety of our protocols on large prospective case series. Asleep-awake protocol can be safely used when intraoperative language mapping is planned, whereas an asleep-asleep protocol with secured airway might be preferred when motor testing only is required.

AB - BACKGROUND: There is no general consensus about the best anesthesiologic approach to use during craniotomies with intraoperative brain mapping, and large prospective studies evaluating the complications associated with different approaches are lacking. Objective of this study was to prospectively collect and evaluate data about a large series of consecutive asleep-awake and asleep-asleep craniotomies. METHODS: We analyzed 238 consecutive procedures from January 2005 to December 2008. During asleep-awake procedures, patients were initially ventilated through a laryngeal mask which was removed to allow language testing. During asleep-asleep procedures, patients remained sedated and intubated to permit motor testing. RESULTS: In asleep-awake craniotomies [n = 135, age 42y (range: 16 to 72y), American Society of Anesthologists classification (ASA) 1 (1 to 3), and body mass index 24.2 ± 3.7 kg/m 2], 43% of the procedures were free of complications. Most common complications were hypertension (27%) and brief clinical seizures (16%), but also hypotension (10%), vomiting (7%), brief periods of apnea (4%), and agitation (6%) were observed. In 7% of the procedures, seizures required pharmacologic treatment. Fifty-nine percent of the asleep-asleep procedures [n=103, age 51y (range: 21 to 76y), ASA 1 (1 to 3), body mass index 25.4 ± 3.9kg/m2, P <0.05 vs. asleep-awake] were free of complications. Clinical seizures were observed in 31% of the cases. The administration of boluses of hypnotics was rarely necessary (6%) and safer because of secured airways. CONCLUSIONS: With this study, we demonstrated the feasibility and safety of our protocols on large prospective case series. Asleep-awake protocol can be safely used when intraoperative language mapping is planned, whereas an asleep-asleep protocol with secured airway might be preferred when motor testing only is required.

KW - Awake craniotomy

KW - Neurophysiologic monitoring

KW - Total intravenous anesthesia

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77949974929&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77949974929&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/ANA.0b013e3181c959f4

DO - 10.1097/ANA.0b013e3181c959f4

M3 - Article

C2 - 20118799

AN - SCOPUS:77949974929

VL - 22

SP - 119

EP - 127

JO - Journal of Neurosurgical Anesthesiology

JF - Journal of Neurosurgical Anesthesiology

SN - 0898-4921

IS - 2

ER -