Anatomic and nonanatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: An in vivo kinematic analysis

Stefano Zaffagnini, Giulio Maria Marcheggiani Muccioli, Cecilia Signorelli, Nicola Lopomo, Alberto Grassi, Tommaso Bonanzinga, Marco Nitri, Maurilio Marcacci

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: There have been no direct in vivo biomechanical comparisons performed between an anatomic double-bundle (ADB) and a nonanatomic double-bundle (NADB) anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Hypothesis: There are differences in kinematic outcomes between ADB and NADB ACL reconstruction techniques. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Twenty-six consecutive patients (mean age, 30 years; range, 18-32 years; 23 men, 3 women; 17 right knees, 9 left knees) with an isolated ACL injury were included in the study. The first 13 consecutive patients underwent NADB reconstruction (combination of a single-bundle and an over-the-top reconstruction), and the following 13 consecutive patients were treated with an ADB approach (using 2 tibial tunnels and 2 femoral tunnels placed in the center of the native femoral and tibial insertion sites). Grafts were pretensioned at 80 N and secured with cortical fixation systems under manual maximum force tension. Standard clinical laxity and pivot-shift tests were quantified at time zero before and after ACL reconstruction by means of a surgical navigation system dedicated to kinematic assessment; displacement of the medial and lateral compartments during the tests was also analyzed. Results: The ADB-reconstructed knees showed a larger preoperative-to-postoperative difference in anterior-posterior tibial plateau displacement of the medial and lateral compartments when compared with the NADB-reconstructed knees during the internal-external rotation test at 30° of flexion (P

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)708-715
Number of pages8
JournalAmerican Journal of Sports Medicine
Volume42
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2014

Fingerprint

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Biomechanical Phenomena
Knee
Thigh
Transplants

Keywords

  • anatomic double-bundle reconstruction
  • anterior cruciate ligament
  • computer-assisted surgery
  • laxity
  • nonanatomic double-bundle reconstruction
  • pivot shift

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Anatomic and nonanatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction : An in vivo kinematic analysis. / Zaffagnini, Stefano; Marcheggiani Muccioli, Giulio Maria; Signorelli, Cecilia; Lopomo, Nicola; Grassi, Alberto; Bonanzinga, Tommaso; Nitri, Marco; Marcacci, Maurilio.

In: American Journal of Sports Medicine, Vol. 42, No. 3, 03.2014, p. 708-715.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Zaffagnini, Stefano ; Marcheggiani Muccioli, Giulio Maria ; Signorelli, Cecilia ; Lopomo, Nicola ; Grassi, Alberto ; Bonanzinga, Tommaso ; Nitri, Marco ; Marcacci, Maurilio. / Anatomic and nonanatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction : An in vivo kinematic analysis. In: American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2014 ; Vol. 42, No. 3. pp. 708-715.
@article{2eee45cedaad4ca8b77dd6351ed7a186,
title = "Anatomic and nonanatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: An in vivo kinematic analysis",
abstract = "Background: There have been no direct in vivo biomechanical comparisons performed between an anatomic double-bundle (ADB) and a nonanatomic double-bundle (NADB) anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Hypothesis: There are differences in kinematic outcomes between ADB and NADB ACL reconstruction techniques. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Twenty-six consecutive patients (mean age, 30 years; range, 18-32 years; 23 men, 3 women; 17 right knees, 9 left knees) with an isolated ACL injury were included in the study. The first 13 consecutive patients underwent NADB reconstruction (combination of a single-bundle and an over-the-top reconstruction), and the following 13 consecutive patients were treated with an ADB approach (using 2 tibial tunnels and 2 femoral tunnels placed in the center of the native femoral and tibial insertion sites). Grafts were pretensioned at 80 N and secured with cortical fixation systems under manual maximum force tension. Standard clinical laxity and pivot-shift tests were quantified at time zero before and after ACL reconstruction by means of a surgical navigation system dedicated to kinematic assessment; displacement of the medial and lateral compartments during the tests was also analyzed. Results: The ADB-reconstructed knees showed a larger preoperative-to-postoperative difference in anterior-posterior tibial plateau displacement of the medial and lateral compartments when compared with the NADB-reconstructed knees during the internal-external rotation test at 30° of flexion (P",
keywords = "anatomic double-bundle reconstruction, anterior cruciate ligament, computer-assisted surgery, laxity, nonanatomic double-bundle reconstruction, pivot shift",
author = "Stefano Zaffagnini and {Marcheggiani Muccioli}, {Giulio Maria} and Cecilia Signorelli and Nicola Lopomo and Alberto Grassi and Tommaso Bonanzinga and Marco Nitri and Maurilio Marcacci",
year = "2014",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1177/0363546513519070",
language = "English",
volume = "42",
pages = "708--715",
journal = "American Journal of Sports Medicine",
issn = "0363-5465",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Anatomic and nonanatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

T2 - An in vivo kinematic analysis

AU - Zaffagnini, Stefano

AU - Marcheggiani Muccioli, Giulio Maria

AU - Signorelli, Cecilia

AU - Lopomo, Nicola

AU - Grassi, Alberto

AU - Bonanzinga, Tommaso

AU - Nitri, Marco

AU - Marcacci, Maurilio

PY - 2014/3

Y1 - 2014/3

N2 - Background: There have been no direct in vivo biomechanical comparisons performed between an anatomic double-bundle (ADB) and a nonanatomic double-bundle (NADB) anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Hypothesis: There are differences in kinematic outcomes between ADB and NADB ACL reconstruction techniques. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Twenty-six consecutive patients (mean age, 30 years; range, 18-32 years; 23 men, 3 women; 17 right knees, 9 left knees) with an isolated ACL injury were included in the study. The first 13 consecutive patients underwent NADB reconstruction (combination of a single-bundle and an over-the-top reconstruction), and the following 13 consecutive patients were treated with an ADB approach (using 2 tibial tunnels and 2 femoral tunnels placed in the center of the native femoral and tibial insertion sites). Grafts were pretensioned at 80 N and secured with cortical fixation systems under manual maximum force tension. Standard clinical laxity and pivot-shift tests were quantified at time zero before and after ACL reconstruction by means of a surgical navigation system dedicated to kinematic assessment; displacement of the medial and lateral compartments during the tests was also analyzed. Results: The ADB-reconstructed knees showed a larger preoperative-to-postoperative difference in anterior-posterior tibial plateau displacement of the medial and lateral compartments when compared with the NADB-reconstructed knees during the internal-external rotation test at 30° of flexion (P

AB - Background: There have been no direct in vivo biomechanical comparisons performed between an anatomic double-bundle (ADB) and a nonanatomic double-bundle (NADB) anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Hypothesis: There are differences in kinematic outcomes between ADB and NADB ACL reconstruction techniques. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Twenty-six consecutive patients (mean age, 30 years; range, 18-32 years; 23 men, 3 women; 17 right knees, 9 left knees) with an isolated ACL injury were included in the study. The first 13 consecutive patients underwent NADB reconstruction (combination of a single-bundle and an over-the-top reconstruction), and the following 13 consecutive patients were treated with an ADB approach (using 2 tibial tunnels and 2 femoral tunnels placed in the center of the native femoral and tibial insertion sites). Grafts were pretensioned at 80 N and secured with cortical fixation systems under manual maximum force tension. Standard clinical laxity and pivot-shift tests were quantified at time zero before and after ACL reconstruction by means of a surgical navigation system dedicated to kinematic assessment; displacement of the medial and lateral compartments during the tests was also analyzed. Results: The ADB-reconstructed knees showed a larger preoperative-to-postoperative difference in anterior-posterior tibial plateau displacement of the medial and lateral compartments when compared with the NADB-reconstructed knees during the internal-external rotation test at 30° of flexion (P

KW - anatomic double-bundle reconstruction

KW - anterior cruciate ligament

KW - computer-assisted surgery

KW - laxity

KW - nonanatomic double-bundle reconstruction

KW - pivot shift

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84897665884&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84897665884&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0363546513519070

DO - 10.1177/0363546513519070

M3 - Article

C2 - 24519185

AN - SCOPUS:84897665884

VL - 42

SP - 708

EP - 715

JO - American Journal of Sports Medicine

JF - American Journal of Sports Medicine

SN - 0363-5465

IS - 3

ER -