Anesthesia for carotid endarterectomy: The third option. patient cooperation during general anesthesia

Sergio Bevilacqua, Stefano Romagnoli, Francesco Ciappi, Chiara Lazzeri, Sandro Gelsomino, Carlo Pratesi, Gian Franco Gensini

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Carotid endarterectomy is typically performed using either regional or general anesthesia techniques, which exhibit several differences, especially regarding the intraoperative neurological monitoring of patients. In this study, we introduce a technique of general anesthesia (cooperative patient general anesthesia), which allows neurological monitoring of the awake patient during surgery. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 181 consecutive adult patients scheduled for carotid endarterectomy. Patients were anesthetized with a total IV anesthesia technique. During carotid clamping, anesthesia was reduced and maintained only with high-dose remifentanil, such that the patient was able to respond to verbal statements and neurological monitoring could be performed. The technique is described in detail. Patient neurological and cardiac outcomes were investigated. Patient and surgeon satisfaction with the technique were also evaluated. RESULTS: General anesthesia with a cooperative patient was achieved in 179 patients. No postoperative neurological events were observed. Two (1.1%) nonfatal myocardial infarctions occurred in the early postoperative period in two patients. Eighty-one percent of patients described the operation duration as brief, whereas 19.3% accurately perceived the time they were conscious. Both patients and surgeons were highly satisfied with the technique. CONCLUSIONS: In our series, cooperative patient general anesthesia proved to be a safe and satisfactory anesthetic technique for both the patient and surgeon. The technique was characterized by hemodynamic stability, excellent control of ventilatory pattern, continuous neurological monitoring, and immediate and safe conversion to general anesthesia whenever required. Further studies are needed to highlight the advantages of this technique compared with standard general and local anesthesia.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1929-1936
Number of pages8
JournalAnesthesia and Analgesia
Volume108
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2009

Fingerprint

Carotid Endarterectomy
Patient Compliance
General Anesthesia
Anesthesia
Intraoperative Monitoring
Conduction Anesthesia
Physiologic Monitoring
Local Anesthesia
Patient Satisfaction
Postoperative Period
Constriction
Anesthetics
Hemodynamics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

Bevilacqua, S., Romagnoli, S., Ciappi, F., Lazzeri, C., Gelsomino, S., Pratesi, C., & Gensini, G. F. (2009). Anesthesia for carotid endarterectomy: The third option. patient cooperation during general anesthesia. Anesthesia and Analgesia, 108(6), 1929-1936. https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0b013e31819f6f7b

Anesthesia for carotid endarterectomy : The third option. patient cooperation during general anesthesia. / Bevilacqua, Sergio; Romagnoli, Stefano; Ciappi, Francesco; Lazzeri, Chiara; Gelsomino, Sandro; Pratesi, Carlo; Gensini, Gian Franco.

In: Anesthesia and Analgesia, Vol. 108, No. 6, 06.2009, p. 1929-1936.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bevilacqua, S, Romagnoli, S, Ciappi, F, Lazzeri, C, Gelsomino, S, Pratesi, C & Gensini, GF 2009, 'Anesthesia for carotid endarterectomy: The third option. patient cooperation during general anesthesia', Anesthesia and Analgesia, vol. 108, no. 6, pp. 1929-1936. https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0b013e31819f6f7b
Bevilacqua, Sergio ; Romagnoli, Stefano ; Ciappi, Francesco ; Lazzeri, Chiara ; Gelsomino, Sandro ; Pratesi, Carlo ; Gensini, Gian Franco. / Anesthesia for carotid endarterectomy : The third option. patient cooperation during general anesthesia. In: Anesthesia and Analgesia. 2009 ; Vol. 108, No. 6. pp. 1929-1936.
@article{f523b364e8494176b468b0bc4faa4d24,
title = "Anesthesia for carotid endarterectomy: The third option. patient cooperation during general anesthesia",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Carotid endarterectomy is typically performed using either regional or general anesthesia techniques, which exhibit several differences, especially regarding the intraoperative neurological monitoring of patients. In this study, we introduce a technique of general anesthesia (cooperative patient general anesthesia), which allows neurological monitoring of the awake patient during surgery. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 181 consecutive adult patients scheduled for carotid endarterectomy. Patients were anesthetized with a total IV anesthesia technique. During carotid clamping, anesthesia was reduced and maintained only with high-dose remifentanil, such that the patient was able to respond to verbal statements and neurological monitoring could be performed. The technique is described in detail. Patient neurological and cardiac outcomes were investigated. Patient and surgeon satisfaction with the technique were also evaluated. RESULTS: General anesthesia with a cooperative patient was achieved in 179 patients. No postoperative neurological events were observed. Two (1.1{\%}) nonfatal myocardial infarctions occurred in the early postoperative period in two patients. Eighty-one percent of patients described the operation duration as brief, whereas 19.3{\%} accurately perceived the time they were conscious. Both patients and surgeons were highly satisfied with the technique. CONCLUSIONS: In our series, cooperative patient general anesthesia proved to be a safe and satisfactory anesthetic technique for both the patient and surgeon. The technique was characterized by hemodynamic stability, excellent control of ventilatory pattern, continuous neurological monitoring, and immediate and safe conversion to general anesthesia whenever required. Further studies are needed to highlight the advantages of this technique compared with standard general and local anesthesia.",
author = "Sergio Bevilacqua and Stefano Romagnoli and Francesco Ciappi and Chiara Lazzeri and Sandro Gelsomino and Carlo Pratesi and Gensini, {Gian Franco}",
year = "2009",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1213/ane.0b013e31819f6f7b",
language = "English",
volume = "108",
pages = "1929--1936",
journal = "Anesthesia and Analgesia",
issn = "0003-2999",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Anesthesia for carotid endarterectomy

T2 - The third option. patient cooperation during general anesthesia

AU - Bevilacqua, Sergio

AU - Romagnoli, Stefano

AU - Ciappi, Francesco

AU - Lazzeri, Chiara

AU - Gelsomino, Sandro

AU - Pratesi, Carlo

AU - Gensini, Gian Franco

PY - 2009/6

Y1 - 2009/6

N2 - BACKGROUND: Carotid endarterectomy is typically performed using either regional or general anesthesia techniques, which exhibit several differences, especially regarding the intraoperative neurological monitoring of patients. In this study, we introduce a technique of general anesthesia (cooperative patient general anesthesia), which allows neurological monitoring of the awake patient during surgery. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 181 consecutive adult patients scheduled for carotid endarterectomy. Patients were anesthetized with a total IV anesthesia technique. During carotid clamping, anesthesia was reduced and maintained only with high-dose remifentanil, such that the patient was able to respond to verbal statements and neurological monitoring could be performed. The technique is described in detail. Patient neurological and cardiac outcomes were investigated. Patient and surgeon satisfaction with the technique were also evaluated. RESULTS: General anesthesia with a cooperative patient was achieved in 179 patients. No postoperative neurological events were observed. Two (1.1%) nonfatal myocardial infarctions occurred in the early postoperative period in two patients. Eighty-one percent of patients described the operation duration as brief, whereas 19.3% accurately perceived the time they were conscious. Both patients and surgeons were highly satisfied with the technique. CONCLUSIONS: In our series, cooperative patient general anesthesia proved to be a safe and satisfactory anesthetic technique for both the patient and surgeon. The technique was characterized by hemodynamic stability, excellent control of ventilatory pattern, continuous neurological monitoring, and immediate and safe conversion to general anesthesia whenever required. Further studies are needed to highlight the advantages of this technique compared with standard general and local anesthesia.

AB - BACKGROUND: Carotid endarterectomy is typically performed using either regional or general anesthesia techniques, which exhibit several differences, especially regarding the intraoperative neurological monitoring of patients. In this study, we introduce a technique of general anesthesia (cooperative patient general anesthesia), which allows neurological monitoring of the awake patient during surgery. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 181 consecutive adult patients scheduled for carotid endarterectomy. Patients were anesthetized with a total IV anesthesia technique. During carotid clamping, anesthesia was reduced and maintained only with high-dose remifentanil, such that the patient was able to respond to verbal statements and neurological monitoring could be performed. The technique is described in detail. Patient neurological and cardiac outcomes were investigated. Patient and surgeon satisfaction with the technique were also evaluated. RESULTS: General anesthesia with a cooperative patient was achieved in 179 patients. No postoperative neurological events were observed. Two (1.1%) nonfatal myocardial infarctions occurred in the early postoperative period in two patients. Eighty-one percent of patients described the operation duration as brief, whereas 19.3% accurately perceived the time they were conscious. Both patients and surgeons were highly satisfied with the technique. CONCLUSIONS: In our series, cooperative patient general anesthesia proved to be a safe and satisfactory anesthetic technique for both the patient and surgeon. The technique was characterized by hemodynamic stability, excellent control of ventilatory pattern, continuous neurological monitoring, and immediate and safe conversion to general anesthesia whenever required. Further studies are needed to highlight the advantages of this technique compared with standard general and local anesthesia.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=66349105318&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=66349105318&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1213/ane.0b013e31819f6f7b

DO - 10.1213/ane.0b013e31819f6f7b

M3 - Article

C2 - 19448224

AN - SCOPUS:66349105318

VL - 108

SP - 1929

EP - 1936

JO - Anesthesia and Analgesia

JF - Anesthesia and Analgesia

SN - 0003-2999

IS - 6

ER -