Anterior cervical fusion: A biomechanical comparison of 4 techniques. Laboratory investigation

Fabio Galbusera, Chiara M. Bellini, Francesco Costa, Roberto Assietti, Maurizio Fornari

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


Object. Cervical instrumented fusion is currently performed using several fixation methods. In the present paper, the authors compare the following 4 implantation methods: a stand-alone cage, a cage supplemented by an anterior locking plate, a cage supplemented by an anterior dynamic plate, and a dynamic combined plate-cage device. Methods. Four finite element models of the C4-7 segments were built, each including a different instrumented fixation type at the C5-6 level. A compressive preload of 100 N combined with a pure moment of 2.5 Nm in flexion, extension, right lateral bending, and right axial rotation was applied to the 4 models. The segmental principal ranges of motion and the load shared by the interbody cage were obtained for each simulation. Results. The stand-alone cage showed the lowest stabilization capability among the 4 configurations investigated, but it was still significant. The cage supplemented by the locking plate was very stiff in all directions. The 2 dynamic plate configurations reduced flexibility in all directions compared with the intact case, but they left significant mobility in the implanted segment. These configurations were able to share a significant part of the load (up to 40% for the combined plate-cage) through the posterior cage. The highest risk of subsidence was obtained with the model of the stand-alone cage. Conclusions. Noticeable differences in the results were detected for the 4 configurations. The actual clinical relevance of these differences, currently considered not of critical importance, should be investigated by randomized clinical trials.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)444-449
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Neurosurgery: Spine
Issue number5
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2008


  • Anterior plate
  • Cage
  • Cervical fusion
  • Dynamic plate
  • Finite element

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Surgery
  • Neurology


Dive into the research topics of 'Anterior cervical fusion: A biomechanical comparison of 4 techniques. Laboratory investigation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this