Anterior chamber and aqueous depth measurement in pseudophakic eyes: Agreement between ultrasound biometry and scheimpflug imaging

Giacomo Savini, Kenneth J. Hoffer, Michele Carbonelli

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare anterior chamber depth (ACD) and aqueous depth (AQD) measurements provided by a Scheimpflug camera combined with corneal topography to those obtained by immersion ultrasound (US) biometry when assessing the distance between the cornea and intraocular lens (IOL) in pseudophakic patients. METHODS: In a sample of 40 consecutive patients, each patient underwent measurements of ACD and AQD by means of the two techniques. Scheimpflug (Sirius; C.S.O., Firenze, Italy) measurements were obtained by manually tracing a line between the anterior surface of the IOL and the central cornea. Results were compared by t test. Agreement was evaluated by Bland-Altman plots with 95% limits of agreement (LoA). RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference between the AQD as measured by US (3.95 ± 0.34 mm; range: 3.39 to 4.74 mm) and the AQD as measured by Scheimpflug photography (3.96 ± 0.34 mm; range: 3.41 to 4.77 mm; P = .3187). The statistically (but not clinically) significant difference between the ACD as measured by US (4.54 ± 0.37 mm; range: 3.93 to 5.35 mm) and Scheimpflug photography (4.58 ± 0.34 mm; range: 4.03 to 5.36 mm; P = .0024) disappeared after setting the US speed for ACD at 1,545 m/sec (mean ACD: 4.58 ± 0.37 mm; range: 3.96 to 5.39 mm). The 95% LoA ranged between -0.15 and +0.18 mm for AQD and between -0.12 and +0.21 mm for ACD. CONCLUSIONS: In pseudophakic eyes, the manual ACD and AQD measurements obtained from the Scheimpflug camera combined with corneal topography are not significantly different compared to those provided by US and therefore can be considered interchangeable with the latter.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)121-125
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Refractive Surgery
Volume29
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2013

Fingerprint

Biometry
Anterior Chamber
Corneal Topography
Intraocular Lenses
Photography
Cornea
Immersion
Italy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology
  • Surgery

Cite this

Anterior chamber and aqueous depth measurement in pseudophakic eyes : Agreement between ultrasound biometry and scheimpflug imaging. / Savini, Giacomo; Hoffer, Kenneth J.; Carbonelli, Michele.

In: Journal of Refractive Surgery, Vol. 29, No. 2, 02.2013, p. 121-125.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ba41e211d4d740ffaf321daaba267c43,
title = "Anterior chamber and aqueous depth measurement in pseudophakic eyes: Agreement between ultrasound biometry and scheimpflug imaging",
abstract = "PURPOSE: To compare anterior chamber depth (ACD) and aqueous depth (AQD) measurements provided by a Scheimpflug camera combined with corneal topography to those obtained by immersion ultrasound (US) biometry when assessing the distance between the cornea and intraocular lens (IOL) in pseudophakic patients. METHODS: In a sample of 40 consecutive patients, each patient underwent measurements of ACD and AQD by means of the two techniques. Scheimpflug (Sirius; C.S.O., Firenze, Italy) measurements were obtained by manually tracing a line between the anterior surface of the IOL and the central cornea. Results were compared by t test. Agreement was evaluated by Bland-Altman plots with 95{\%} limits of agreement (LoA). RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference between the AQD as measured by US (3.95 ± 0.34 mm; range: 3.39 to 4.74 mm) and the AQD as measured by Scheimpflug photography (3.96 ± 0.34 mm; range: 3.41 to 4.77 mm; P = .3187). The statistically (but not clinically) significant difference between the ACD as measured by US (4.54 ± 0.37 mm; range: 3.93 to 5.35 mm) and Scheimpflug photography (4.58 ± 0.34 mm; range: 4.03 to 5.36 mm; P = .0024) disappeared after setting the US speed for ACD at 1,545 m/sec (mean ACD: 4.58 ± 0.37 mm; range: 3.96 to 5.39 mm). The 95{\%} LoA ranged between -0.15 and +0.18 mm for AQD and between -0.12 and +0.21 mm for ACD. CONCLUSIONS: In pseudophakic eyes, the manual ACD and AQD measurements obtained from the Scheimpflug camera combined with corneal topography are not significantly different compared to those provided by US and therefore can be considered interchangeable with the latter.",
author = "Giacomo Savini and Hoffer, {Kenneth J.} and Michele Carbonelli",
year = "2013",
month = "2",
doi = "10.3928/1081597X-20130117-07",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "121--125",
journal = "Journal of Refractive Surgery",
issn = "1081-597X",
publisher = "Slack Incorporated",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Anterior chamber and aqueous depth measurement in pseudophakic eyes

T2 - Agreement between ultrasound biometry and scheimpflug imaging

AU - Savini, Giacomo

AU - Hoffer, Kenneth J.

AU - Carbonelli, Michele

PY - 2013/2

Y1 - 2013/2

N2 - PURPOSE: To compare anterior chamber depth (ACD) and aqueous depth (AQD) measurements provided by a Scheimpflug camera combined with corneal topography to those obtained by immersion ultrasound (US) biometry when assessing the distance between the cornea and intraocular lens (IOL) in pseudophakic patients. METHODS: In a sample of 40 consecutive patients, each patient underwent measurements of ACD and AQD by means of the two techniques. Scheimpflug (Sirius; C.S.O., Firenze, Italy) measurements were obtained by manually tracing a line between the anterior surface of the IOL and the central cornea. Results were compared by t test. Agreement was evaluated by Bland-Altman plots with 95% limits of agreement (LoA). RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference between the AQD as measured by US (3.95 ± 0.34 mm; range: 3.39 to 4.74 mm) and the AQD as measured by Scheimpflug photography (3.96 ± 0.34 mm; range: 3.41 to 4.77 mm; P = .3187). The statistically (but not clinically) significant difference between the ACD as measured by US (4.54 ± 0.37 mm; range: 3.93 to 5.35 mm) and Scheimpflug photography (4.58 ± 0.34 mm; range: 4.03 to 5.36 mm; P = .0024) disappeared after setting the US speed for ACD at 1,545 m/sec (mean ACD: 4.58 ± 0.37 mm; range: 3.96 to 5.39 mm). The 95% LoA ranged between -0.15 and +0.18 mm for AQD and between -0.12 and +0.21 mm for ACD. CONCLUSIONS: In pseudophakic eyes, the manual ACD and AQD measurements obtained from the Scheimpflug camera combined with corneal topography are not significantly different compared to those provided by US and therefore can be considered interchangeable with the latter.

AB - PURPOSE: To compare anterior chamber depth (ACD) and aqueous depth (AQD) measurements provided by a Scheimpflug camera combined with corneal topography to those obtained by immersion ultrasound (US) biometry when assessing the distance between the cornea and intraocular lens (IOL) in pseudophakic patients. METHODS: In a sample of 40 consecutive patients, each patient underwent measurements of ACD and AQD by means of the two techniques. Scheimpflug (Sirius; C.S.O., Firenze, Italy) measurements were obtained by manually tracing a line between the anterior surface of the IOL and the central cornea. Results were compared by t test. Agreement was evaluated by Bland-Altman plots with 95% limits of agreement (LoA). RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference between the AQD as measured by US (3.95 ± 0.34 mm; range: 3.39 to 4.74 mm) and the AQD as measured by Scheimpflug photography (3.96 ± 0.34 mm; range: 3.41 to 4.77 mm; P = .3187). The statistically (but not clinically) significant difference between the ACD as measured by US (4.54 ± 0.37 mm; range: 3.93 to 5.35 mm) and Scheimpflug photography (4.58 ± 0.34 mm; range: 4.03 to 5.36 mm; P = .0024) disappeared after setting the US speed for ACD at 1,545 m/sec (mean ACD: 4.58 ± 0.37 mm; range: 3.96 to 5.39 mm). The 95% LoA ranged between -0.15 and +0.18 mm for AQD and between -0.12 and +0.21 mm for ACD. CONCLUSIONS: In pseudophakic eyes, the manual ACD and AQD measurements obtained from the Scheimpflug camera combined with corneal topography are not significantly different compared to those provided by US and therefore can be considered interchangeable with the latter.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84875596377&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84875596377&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3928/1081597X-20130117-07

DO - 10.3928/1081597X-20130117-07

M3 - Article

C2 - 23380413

AN - SCOPUS:84875596377

VL - 29

SP - 121

EP - 125

JO - Journal of Refractive Surgery

JF - Journal of Refractive Surgery

SN - 1081-597X

IS - 2

ER -