Antiepileptic drug teratogenicity and de novo genetic variation load

Piero Perucca, Alison Anderson, Dana Jazayeri, Alison Hitchcock, Janet Graham, Marian Todaro, Torbjörn Tomson, Dina Battino, Emilio Perucca, Meritxell Martinez Ferri, Anne Rochtus, Lieven Lagae, Maria Paola Canevini, Elena Zambrelli, Ellen Campbell, Bobby P C Koeleman, Ingrid E Scheffer, Samuel F Berkovic, Patrick Kwan, Sanjay M SisodiyaDavid B Goldstein, Slavé Petrovski, John Craig, Frank J E Vajda, Terence J O'Brien

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The mechanisms by which antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) cause birth defects (BDs) are unknown. Data suggest that AED-induced BDs may result from a genome-wide increase of de novo variants in the embryo, a mechanism which we investigated.

METHODS: Whole-exome sequencing data from child-parent trios were interrogated for de novo single-nucleotide variants/indels (dnSNVs/indels) and copy number variants (dnCNVs). Generalized linear models were applied to assess de novo variant burdens in: children exposed prenatally to AEDs (AED-exposed children) vs children without BDs not exposed prenatally to AEDs (AED-unexposed unaffected children), and AED-exposed children with BDs vs those without BDs, adjusting for confounders. Fisher's exact test was used to compare categorical data.

RESULTS: 67 child-parent trios were included: 10 with AED-exposed children with BDs; 46 with AED-exposed unaffected children; 11 with AED-unexposed unaffected children. The dnSNV/indel burden did not differ between AED-exposed children and AED-unexposed unaffected children [median dnSNV/indel number/child (range): 3 (0-7) vs 3 (1-5), p = 0.50]. Among AED-exposed children, there were no significant differences between those with BDs and those unaffected. Likely deleterious dnSNVs/indels were detected in 9/67 (13%) children, none of whom had BDs. The proportion of cases harbouring likely deleterious dnSNVs/indels did not differ significantly between AED-unexposed and AED-exposed children. The dnCNV burden was not associated with AED exposure or birth outcome.

INTERPRETATION: Our study indicates that prenatal AED exposure does not increase the burden of de novo variants, and that this mechanism is not a major contributor to AED-induced BDs. These results can be incorporated in routine patient counselling. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)897–906
Number of pages9
JournalAnnals of Neurology
Volume87
Early online date2020
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 25 2020

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Antiepileptic drug teratogenicity and de novo genetic variation load'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this