Aortic annulus area assessment by multidetector computed tomography for predicting paravalvular regurgitation in patients undergoing balloon-expandable transcatheter aortic valve implantation: A comparison with transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography

Gianluca Pontone, Daniele Andreini, Antonio L. Bartorelli, Erika Bertella, Sarah Cortinovis, Saima Mushtaq, Andrea Annoni, Alberto Formenti, Andrea Baggiano, Edoardo Conte, Gloria Tamborini, Manuela Muratori, Paola Gripari, Francesca Bovis, Fabrizio Veglia, Claudia Foti, Francesco Alamanni, Giovanni Ballerini, Cesare Fiorentini, Mauro Pepi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a valid alternative to surgery in high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis. Aortic annulus (AoA) sizing is crucial for TAVI success. The aim of the study was to compare AoA dimensions measured by multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) vs those obtained with transthoracic (TTE) and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) for predicting paravalvular aortic regurgitation (PVR) after TAVI. Methods: Aortic annulus maximum diameter, minimum diameter, and area were assessed using MDCT and compared with TTE and TEE diameter and area for predicting PVR after TAVI in 151 patients (45 men, age 81.2 ± 6.4 years). Results: Aortic annulus maximum, minimum diameter, and area detected by MDCT were 25.04 ± 2.39 mm, 21.27 ± 2.10 mm, and 420.87 ± 76.10 mm2, respectively. Aortic annulus diameter and area measured by TTE and TEE were 21.14 ± 1.94 mm and 353.82 ± 64.57 mm2 and 22.04 ± 1.94 mm and 384.33 ± 67.30 mm2, respectively. A good correlation was found between AoA diameters and area evaluated by MDCT vs TTE and TEE (0.61, 0.65, and 0.69 and 0.61, 0.65, and 0.70, respectively), with a mean difference of 3.90 ± 1.98 mm, 0.13 ± 1.67 mm, and 67.05 ± 55.87 mm2 and 3.0 ± 2.0 mm, 0.77 ± 1.70 mm, and 36.54 ± 56.43 mm2, respectively. Grade ≥2 PVR occurred in 46 patients and was related to male gender, higher body mass index, preprocedural aortic regurgitation, and lower mismatch between the nominal area of the implanted prosthesis and AoA area detected by MDCT. Conclusions: Mismatch between prosthesis area and AoA area detected by MDCT is a better predictor of PVR as compared with echocardiography mismatch. Specific MDCT-based sizing recommendations should be developed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)576-584
Number of pages9
JournalAmerican Heart Journal
Volume164
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2012

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Aortic annulus area assessment by multidetector computed tomography for predicting paravalvular regurgitation in patients undergoing balloon-expandable transcatheter aortic valve implantation: A comparison with transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this