Application and advantages of monoenergetic reconstruction images for the reduction of metallic artifacts using dual-energy CT in knee and hip prostheses

Nicola Magarelli, Vincenzo De Santis, Giammaria Marziali, Amerigo Menghi, Aaron Burrofato, Luigi Pedone, Dario Del Prete, Roberto Iezzi, Chiara de Waure, Marianna D’andrea, Antonio Leone, Cesare Colosimo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: The study aimed to assess image quality when using dual-energy CT (DECT) to reduce metal artifacts in subjects with knee and hip prostheses. Methods: Twenty-two knee and 10 hip prostheses were examined in 31 patients using a DECT protocol (tube voltages 100 and 140 kVp). Monoenergetic reconstructions were extrapolated at 64, 69, 88, 105, 110, 120, 140, 170, and 190 kilo-electron volts (keV) and the optimal energy was manually selected. The B60–140 and Fast DE reconstructions were made by CT. The image quality and diagnostic value were subjectively and objectively determined. Double-blind qualitative assessment was performed by two radiologists using a Likert scale. For quantitative analysis, a circular region of interest (ROI) was placed by a third radiologist within the most evident streak artifacts on every image. Another ROI was placed in surrounding tissues without artifacts as a reference. Results: The inter-reader agreement for the qualitative assessment was nearly 100%. The best overall image quality (37.8% rated “excellent”) was the Fast DE Siemens reconstruction, followed by B60–140 and Opt KeV (20.5 and 10.2% rated excellent). On the other hand, DECT images at 64, 69 and 88 keV had the worse scores. The number of artifacts was significantly different between monoenergetic images. Nevertheless, because of the high number of pairwise comparisons, no differences were found in the post hoc analysis except for a trend toward statistical significance when comparing the 170 and 64 keV doses. Conclusions: DECT with specific post-processing may reduce metal artifacts and significantly enhance the image quality and diagnostic value when evaluating metallic implants.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)593-600
Number of pages8
JournalRadiologia Medica
Volume123
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 1 2018

Fingerprint

Knee Prosthesis
Hip Prosthesis
Computer-Assisted Image Processing
Artifacts
Metals
Knee
Electrons

Keywords

  • Artifact
  • Beam hardening
  • DECT
  • Hip metallic prostheses
  • Knee metallic prostheses
  • Photon beam

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Application and advantages of monoenergetic reconstruction images for the reduction of metallic artifacts using dual-energy CT in knee and hip prostheses. / Magarelli, Nicola; De Santis, Vincenzo; Marziali, Giammaria; Menghi, Amerigo; Burrofato, Aaron; Pedone, Luigi; Del Prete, Dario; Iezzi, Roberto; de Waure, Chiara; D’andrea, Marianna; Leone, Antonio; Colosimo, Cesare.

In: Radiologia Medica, Vol. 123, No. 8, 01.08.2018, p. 593-600.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Magarelli, Nicola ; De Santis, Vincenzo ; Marziali, Giammaria ; Menghi, Amerigo ; Burrofato, Aaron ; Pedone, Luigi ; Del Prete, Dario ; Iezzi, Roberto ; de Waure, Chiara ; D’andrea, Marianna ; Leone, Antonio ; Colosimo, Cesare. / Application and advantages of monoenergetic reconstruction images for the reduction of metallic artifacts using dual-energy CT in knee and hip prostheses. In: Radiologia Medica. 2018 ; Vol. 123, No. 8. pp. 593-600.
@article{fc2395ef2d2e4d09b9c9703f0439c12d,
title = "Application and advantages of monoenergetic reconstruction images for the reduction of metallic artifacts using dual-energy CT in knee and hip prostheses",
abstract = "Objective: The study aimed to assess image quality when using dual-energy CT (DECT) to reduce metal artifacts in subjects with knee and hip prostheses. Methods: Twenty-two knee and 10 hip prostheses were examined in 31 patients using a DECT protocol (tube voltages 100 and 140 kVp). Monoenergetic reconstructions were extrapolated at 64, 69, 88, 105, 110, 120, 140, 170, and 190 kilo-electron volts (keV) and the optimal energy was manually selected. The B60–140 and Fast DE reconstructions were made by CT. The image quality and diagnostic value were subjectively and objectively determined. Double-blind qualitative assessment was performed by two radiologists using a Likert scale. For quantitative analysis, a circular region of interest (ROI) was placed by a third radiologist within the most evident streak artifacts on every image. Another ROI was placed in surrounding tissues without artifacts as a reference. Results: The inter-reader agreement for the qualitative assessment was nearly 100{\%}. The best overall image quality (37.8{\%} rated “excellent”) was the Fast DE Siemens reconstruction, followed by B60–140 and Opt KeV (20.5 and 10.2{\%} rated excellent). On the other hand, DECT images at 64, 69 and 88 keV had the worse scores. The number of artifacts was significantly different between monoenergetic images. Nevertheless, because of the high number of pairwise comparisons, no differences were found in the post hoc analysis except for a trend toward statistical significance when comparing the 170 and 64 keV doses. Conclusions: DECT with specific post-processing may reduce metal artifacts and significantly enhance the image quality and diagnostic value when evaluating metallic implants.",
keywords = "Artifact, Beam hardening, DECT, Hip metallic prostheses, Knee metallic prostheses, Photon beam",
author = "Nicola Magarelli and {De Santis}, Vincenzo and Giammaria Marziali and Amerigo Menghi and Aaron Burrofato and Luigi Pedone and {Del Prete}, Dario and Roberto Iezzi and {de Waure}, Chiara and Marianna D’andrea and Antonio Leone and Cesare Colosimo",
year = "2018",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11547-018-0881-8",
language = "English",
volume = "123",
pages = "593--600",
journal = "Radiologia Medica",
issn = "0033-8362",
publisher = "Springer-Verlag Italia s.r.l.",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Application and advantages of monoenergetic reconstruction images for the reduction of metallic artifacts using dual-energy CT in knee and hip prostheses

AU - Magarelli, Nicola

AU - De Santis, Vincenzo

AU - Marziali, Giammaria

AU - Menghi, Amerigo

AU - Burrofato, Aaron

AU - Pedone, Luigi

AU - Del Prete, Dario

AU - Iezzi, Roberto

AU - de Waure, Chiara

AU - D’andrea, Marianna

AU - Leone, Antonio

AU - Colosimo, Cesare

PY - 2018/8/1

Y1 - 2018/8/1

N2 - Objective: The study aimed to assess image quality when using dual-energy CT (DECT) to reduce metal artifacts in subjects with knee and hip prostheses. Methods: Twenty-two knee and 10 hip prostheses were examined in 31 patients using a DECT protocol (tube voltages 100 and 140 kVp). Monoenergetic reconstructions were extrapolated at 64, 69, 88, 105, 110, 120, 140, 170, and 190 kilo-electron volts (keV) and the optimal energy was manually selected. The B60–140 and Fast DE reconstructions were made by CT. The image quality and diagnostic value were subjectively and objectively determined. Double-blind qualitative assessment was performed by two radiologists using a Likert scale. For quantitative analysis, a circular region of interest (ROI) was placed by a third radiologist within the most evident streak artifacts on every image. Another ROI was placed in surrounding tissues without artifacts as a reference. Results: The inter-reader agreement for the qualitative assessment was nearly 100%. The best overall image quality (37.8% rated “excellent”) was the Fast DE Siemens reconstruction, followed by B60–140 and Opt KeV (20.5 and 10.2% rated excellent). On the other hand, DECT images at 64, 69 and 88 keV had the worse scores. The number of artifacts was significantly different between monoenergetic images. Nevertheless, because of the high number of pairwise comparisons, no differences were found in the post hoc analysis except for a trend toward statistical significance when comparing the 170 and 64 keV doses. Conclusions: DECT with specific post-processing may reduce metal artifacts and significantly enhance the image quality and diagnostic value when evaluating metallic implants.

AB - Objective: The study aimed to assess image quality when using dual-energy CT (DECT) to reduce metal artifacts in subjects with knee and hip prostheses. Methods: Twenty-two knee and 10 hip prostheses were examined in 31 patients using a DECT protocol (tube voltages 100 and 140 kVp). Monoenergetic reconstructions were extrapolated at 64, 69, 88, 105, 110, 120, 140, 170, and 190 kilo-electron volts (keV) and the optimal energy was manually selected. The B60–140 and Fast DE reconstructions were made by CT. The image quality and diagnostic value were subjectively and objectively determined. Double-blind qualitative assessment was performed by two radiologists using a Likert scale. For quantitative analysis, a circular region of interest (ROI) was placed by a third radiologist within the most evident streak artifacts on every image. Another ROI was placed in surrounding tissues without artifacts as a reference. Results: The inter-reader agreement for the qualitative assessment was nearly 100%. The best overall image quality (37.8% rated “excellent”) was the Fast DE Siemens reconstruction, followed by B60–140 and Opt KeV (20.5 and 10.2% rated excellent). On the other hand, DECT images at 64, 69 and 88 keV had the worse scores. The number of artifacts was significantly different between monoenergetic images. Nevertheless, because of the high number of pairwise comparisons, no differences were found in the post hoc analysis except for a trend toward statistical significance when comparing the 170 and 64 keV doses. Conclusions: DECT with specific post-processing may reduce metal artifacts and significantly enhance the image quality and diagnostic value when evaluating metallic implants.

KW - Artifact

KW - Beam hardening

KW - DECT

KW - Hip metallic prostheses

KW - Knee metallic prostheses

KW - Photon beam

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85045140994&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85045140994&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11547-018-0881-8

DO - 10.1007/s11547-018-0881-8

M3 - Article

VL - 123

SP - 593

EP - 600

JO - Radiologia Medica

JF - Radiologia Medica

SN - 0033-8362

IS - 8

ER -