Appropriatezza delle procedure diagnostiche in prevenzione cardiovascolare: Di che cosa possiamo fare a meno?

Translated title of the contribution: Appropriateness of diagnostic procedures in cardiovascular disease prevention: What can we do without?

Antonella Cherubini, Gian Francesco Mureddu, Pier Luigi Temporelli, Anna Frisinghelli, Piero Clavario, Francesca Cesana, Francesco Fattirolli, Stefano De Servi, Fausto Rigo, Massimo Uguccioni

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In recent years, a huge increase in the use of cardiac procedures, both invasive and non-invasive, was observed. Diagnostic tests, mainly non-invasive tests, are often prescribed inappropriately, in most cases replacing the clinical evaluation. The rate of inappropriate tests in cardiology is largely variable, depending on regional issues and different medical approach. When the test entails radiation exposure, the biological risk for both the patient and the environment must be taken into account. For this reason, the test that results in less biological risk should always be preferred as a first step. Moreover, it has not been clearly demonstrated that some diagnostic tests help to improve the outcome, that is to prevent cardiovascular events. As many as one sixth of the patients who undergo stress imaging are not taking proper medication, and very frequently no change in therapy is made after the test, regardless of the outcome. Since the appropriateness of diagnostic evaluation requests is mandatory, we focused on the diagnostic tests usually performed in primary and secondary prevention that carry no contribution to the clinical management of patients. This review addresses the need to optimize available resources, reduce costs and avoid unnecessary cardiovascular assessments, thereby enhancing the more efficient care delivery models.

Original languageItalian
Pages (from-to)253-263
Number of pages11
JournalGiornale Italiano di Cardiologia
Volume15
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Routine Diagnostic Tests
Cardiovascular Diseases
Primary Prevention
Secondary Prevention
Cardiology
Costs and Cost Analysis
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Appropriatezza delle procedure diagnostiche in prevenzione cardiovascolare : Di che cosa possiamo fare a meno? / Cherubini, Antonella; Mureddu, Gian Francesco; Temporelli, Pier Luigi; Frisinghelli, Anna; Clavario, Piero; Cesana, Francesca; Fattirolli, Francesco; De Servi, Stefano; Rigo, Fausto; Uguccioni, Massimo.

In: Giornale Italiano di Cardiologia, Vol. 15, No. 4, 2014, p. 253-263.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cherubini, A, Mureddu, GF, Temporelli, PL, Frisinghelli, A, Clavario, P, Cesana, F, Fattirolli, F, De Servi, S, Rigo, F & Uguccioni, M 2014, 'Appropriatezza delle procedure diagnostiche in prevenzione cardiovascolare: Di che cosa possiamo fare a meno?', Giornale Italiano di Cardiologia, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 253-263. https://doi.org/10.1714/1497.16507
Cherubini, Antonella ; Mureddu, Gian Francesco ; Temporelli, Pier Luigi ; Frisinghelli, Anna ; Clavario, Piero ; Cesana, Francesca ; Fattirolli, Francesco ; De Servi, Stefano ; Rigo, Fausto ; Uguccioni, Massimo. / Appropriatezza delle procedure diagnostiche in prevenzione cardiovascolare : Di che cosa possiamo fare a meno?. In: Giornale Italiano di Cardiologia. 2014 ; Vol. 15, No. 4. pp. 253-263.
@article{dbdaebe4b6304e9bb9634e70ead89104,
title = "Appropriatezza delle procedure diagnostiche in prevenzione cardiovascolare: Di che cosa possiamo fare a meno?",
abstract = "In recent years, a huge increase in the use of cardiac procedures, both invasive and non-invasive, was observed. Diagnostic tests, mainly non-invasive tests, are often prescribed inappropriately, in most cases replacing the clinical evaluation. The rate of inappropriate tests in cardiology is largely variable, depending on regional issues and different medical approach. When the test entails radiation exposure, the biological risk for both the patient and the environment must be taken into account. For this reason, the test that results in less biological risk should always be preferred as a first step. Moreover, it has not been clearly demonstrated that some diagnostic tests help to improve the outcome, that is to prevent cardiovascular events. As many as one sixth of the patients who undergo stress imaging are not taking proper medication, and very frequently no change in therapy is made after the test, regardless of the outcome. Since the appropriateness of diagnostic evaluation requests is mandatory, we focused on the diagnostic tests usually performed in primary and secondary prevention that carry no contribution to the clinical management of patients. This review addresses the need to optimize available resources, reduce costs and avoid unnecessary cardiovascular assessments, thereby enhancing the more efficient care delivery models.",
keywords = "Appropriateness, Non-invasive cardiac evaluation, Preventive cardiology",
author = "Antonella Cherubini and Mureddu, {Gian Francesco} and Temporelli, {Pier Luigi} and Anna Frisinghelli and Piero Clavario and Francesca Cesana and Francesco Fattirolli and {De Servi}, Stefano and Fausto Rigo and Massimo Uguccioni",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1714/1497.16507",
language = "Italian",
volume = "15",
pages = "253--263",
journal = "Giornale Italiano di Cardiologia",
issn = "1827-6806",
publisher = "CEPI s.r.l.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Appropriatezza delle procedure diagnostiche in prevenzione cardiovascolare

T2 - Di che cosa possiamo fare a meno?

AU - Cherubini, Antonella

AU - Mureddu, Gian Francesco

AU - Temporelli, Pier Luigi

AU - Frisinghelli, Anna

AU - Clavario, Piero

AU - Cesana, Francesca

AU - Fattirolli, Francesco

AU - De Servi, Stefano

AU - Rigo, Fausto

AU - Uguccioni, Massimo

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - In recent years, a huge increase in the use of cardiac procedures, both invasive and non-invasive, was observed. Diagnostic tests, mainly non-invasive tests, are often prescribed inappropriately, in most cases replacing the clinical evaluation. The rate of inappropriate tests in cardiology is largely variable, depending on regional issues and different medical approach. When the test entails radiation exposure, the biological risk for both the patient and the environment must be taken into account. For this reason, the test that results in less biological risk should always be preferred as a first step. Moreover, it has not been clearly demonstrated that some diagnostic tests help to improve the outcome, that is to prevent cardiovascular events. As many as one sixth of the patients who undergo stress imaging are not taking proper medication, and very frequently no change in therapy is made after the test, regardless of the outcome. Since the appropriateness of diagnostic evaluation requests is mandatory, we focused on the diagnostic tests usually performed in primary and secondary prevention that carry no contribution to the clinical management of patients. This review addresses the need to optimize available resources, reduce costs and avoid unnecessary cardiovascular assessments, thereby enhancing the more efficient care delivery models.

AB - In recent years, a huge increase in the use of cardiac procedures, both invasive and non-invasive, was observed. Diagnostic tests, mainly non-invasive tests, are often prescribed inappropriately, in most cases replacing the clinical evaluation. The rate of inappropriate tests in cardiology is largely variable, depending on regional issues and different medical approach. When the test entails radiation exposure, the biological risk for both the patient and the environment must be taken into account. For this reason, the test that results in less biological risk should always be preferred as a first step. Moreover, it has not been clearly demonstrated that some diagnostic tests help to improve the outcome, that is to prevent cardiovascular events. As many as one sixth of the patients who undergo stress imaging are not taking proper medication, and very frequently no change in therapy is made after the test, regardless of the outcome. Since the appropriateness of diagnostic evaluation requests is mandatory, we focused on the diagnostic tests usually performed in primary and secondary prevention that carry no contribution to the clinical management of patients. This review addresses the need to optimize available resources, reduce costs and avoid unnecessary cardiovascular assessments, thereby enhancing the more efficient care delivery models.

KW - Appropriateness

KW - Non-invasive cardiac evaluation

KW - Preventive cardiology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84901810788&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84901810788&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1714/1497.16507

DO - 10.1714/1497.16507

M3 - Articolo

C2 - 24873815

AN - SCOPUS:84901810788

VL - 15

SP - 253

EP - 263

JO - Giornale Italiano di Cardiologia

JF - Giornale Italiano di Cardiologia

SN - 1827-6806

IS - 4

ER -