Appropriateness of Duplex ultrasound assessment on venous system of the legs: A two-month preliminary analysis

Silvia Stegher, Maria Teresa Occhiuto, Daniela P. Mazzaccaro, Paolo Carlo Righini, Alfredo Modafferi, Giovanni Malacrida, Giovanni Nano

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

AIM: The goal of this study is to evaluate the appropriateness to prescribe venous ultrasound of lower limbs. MATERIAL OF STUDY: Over a two months period, 1005 Duplex scans were performed by our Vascular Surgery Unit; out of the total, 225 exams were conducted on venous system of lower limbs. We retrospectively analyzed appropriateness of prescription (according to Lombardy District indications), urgency of prescription, time-lapse between application for the exams and its execution, positive or negative results, National Health System's sustained cost. RESULTS: During the above mentioned period, 87,5% of the exams were conducted as normal screening with no urgency characteristics, 61 exams (27%) were combined with arterial duplex of the same district. General Practitioners' requests accounted for 76,8% while only 9,7% were from vascular surgeons. Following indications of appropriateness, 117 exams (52%) were judged as appropriate. Combining appropriateness and result (χ2 test) we found that if the indication was inappropriate the negative result rate was 90,75%; in the group of exams prescribed with an urgent request the rate of appropriateness raised to 60,7% of whose 94.1% were pathologically positive. DISCUSSION: There is no evidence in Literature about appropriateness of prescription of Duplex ultrasound for vascular districts. While Lombardy District recently published guidelines for prescription, neither vascular surgeon societies nor National Health Service ever provided any indication. CONCLUSION: Nowadays there is increasing demand for appropriateness in healthcare. This study delivered such significant data to make it a pivotal study for an extended analysis during 2016.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-6
Number of pages6
JournalAnnali Italiani di Chirurgia
Volume88
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - Jan 1 2017

Fingerprint

Prescriptions
Blood Vessels
Leg
Lower Extremity
National Health Programs
General Practitioners
Guidelines
Delivery of Health Care
Costs and Cost Analysis
Health
Surgeons

Keywords

  • Appropriateness
  • Vascular Duplex Ultrasound
  • Venous System

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Appropriateness of Duplex ultrasound assessment on venous system of the legs : A two-month preliminary analysis. / Stegher, Silvia; Occhiuto, Maria Teresa; Mazzaccaro, Daniela P.; Righini, Paolo Carlo; Modafferi, Alfredo; Malacrida, Giovanni; Nano, Giovanni.

In: Annali Italiani di Chirurgia, Vol. 88, No. 1, 01.01.2017, p. 1-6.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Stegher, Silvia ; Occhiuto, Maria Teresa ; Mazzaccaro, Daniela P. ; Righini, Paolo Carlo ; Modafferi, Alfredo ; Malacrida, Giovanni ; Nano, Giovanni. / Appropriateness of Duplex ultrasound assessment on venous system of the legs : A two-month preliminary analysis. In: Annali Italiani di Chirurgia. 2017 ; Vol. 88, No. 1. pp. 1-6.
@article{d428277940174ac6a647d9d30532e8bb,
title = "Appropriateness of Duplex ultrasound assessment on venous system of the legs: A two-month preliminary analysis",
abstract = "AIM: The goal of this study is to evaluate the appropriateness to prescribe venous ultrasound of lower limbs. MATERIAL OF STUDY: Over a two months period, 1005 Duplex scans were performed by our Vascular Surgery Unit; out of the total, 225 exams were conducted on venous system of lower limbs. We retrospectively analyzed appropriateness of prescription (according to Lombardy District indications), urgency of prescription, time-lapse between application for the exams and its execution, positive or negative results, National Health System's sustained cost. RESULTS: During the above mentioned period, 87,5{\%} of the exams were conducted as normal screening with no urgency characteristics, 61 exams (27{\%}) were combined with arterial duplex of the same district. General Practitioners' requests accounted for 76,8{\%} while only 9,7{\%} were from vascular surgeons. Following indications of appropriateness, 117 exams (52{\%}) were judged as appropriate. Combining appropriateness and result (χ2 test) we found that if the indication was inappropriate the negative result rate was 90,75{\%}; in the group of exams prescribed with an urgent request the rate of appropriateness raised to 60,7{\%} of whose 94.1{\%} were pathologically positive. DISCUSSION: There is no evidence in Literature about appropriateness of prescription of Duplex ultrasound for vascular districts. While Lombardy District recently published guidelines for prescription, neither vascular surgeon societies nor National Health Service ever provided any indication. CONCLUSION: Nowadays there is increasing demand for appropriateness in healthcare. This study delivered such significant data to make it a pivotal study for an extended analysis during 2016.",
keywords = "Appropriateness, Vascular Duplex Ultrasound, Venous System",
author = "Silvia Stegher and Occhiuto, {Maria Teresa} and Mazzaccaro, {Daniela P.} and Righini, {Paolo Carlo} and Alfredo Modafferi and Giovanni Malacrida and Giovanni Nano",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "88",
pages = "1--6",
journal = "Annali Italiani di Chirurgia",
issn = "0003-469X",
publisher = "Edizioni Luigi Pozzi S.r.l.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Appropriateness of Duplex ultrasound assessment on venous system of the legs

T2 - A two-month preliminary analysis

AU - Stegher, Silvia

AU - Occhiuto, Maria Teresa

AU - Mazzaccaro, Daniela P.

AU - Righini, Paolo Carlo

AU - Modafferi, Alfredo

AU - Malacrida, Giovanni

AU - Nano, Giovanni

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - AIM: The goal of this study is to evaluate the appropriateness to prescribe venous ultrasound of lower limbs. MATERIAL OF STUDY: Over a two months period, 1005 Duplex scans were performed by our Vascular Surgery Unit; out of the total, 225 exams were conducted on venous system of lower limbs. We retrospectively analyzed appropriateness of prescription (according to Lombardy District indications), urgency of prescription, time-lapse between application for the exams and its execution, positive or negative results, National Health System's sustained cost. RESULTS: During the above mentioned period, 87,5% of the exams were conducted as normal screening with no urgency characteristics, 61 exams (27%) were combined with arterial duplex of the same district. General Practitioners' requests accounted for 76,8% while only 9,7% were from vascular surgeons. Following indications of appropriateness, 117 exams (52%) were judged as appropriate. Combining appropriateness and result (χ2 test) we found that if the indication was inappropriate the negative result rate was 90,75%; in the group of exams prescribed with an urgent request the rate of appropriateness raised to 60,7% of whose 94.1% were pathologically positive. DISCUSSION: There is no evidence in Literature about appropriateness of prescription of Duplex ultrasound for vascular districts. While Lombardy District recently published guidelines for prescription, neither vascular surgeon societies nor National Health Service ever provided any indication. CONCLUSION: Nowadays there is increasing demand for appropriateness in healthcare. This study delivered such significant data to make it a pivotal study for an extended analysis during 2016.

AB - AIM: The goal of this study is to evaluate the appropriateness to prescribe venous ultrasound of lower limbs. MATERIAL OF STUDY: Over a two months period, 1005 Duplex scans were performed by our Vascular Surgery Unit; out of the total, 225 exams were conducted on venous system of lower limbs. We retrospectively analyzed appropriateness of prescription (according to Lombardy District indications), urgency of prescription, time-lapse between application for the exams and its execution, positive or negative results, National Health System's sustained cost. RESULTS: During the above mentioned period, 87,5% of the exams were conducted as normal screening with no urgency characteristics, 61 exams (27%) were combined with arterial duplex of the same district. General Practitioners' requests accounted for 76,8% while only 9,7% were from vascular surgeons. Following indications of appropriateness, 117 exams (52%) were judged as appropriate. Combining appropriateness and result (χ2 test) we found that if the indication was inappropriate the negative result rate was 90,75%; in the group of exams prescribed with an urgent request the rate of appropriateness raised to 60,7% of whose 94.1% were pathologically positive. DISCUSSION: There is no evidence in Literature about appropriateness of prescription of Duplex ultrasound for vascular districts. While Lombardy District recently published guidelines for prescription, neither vascular surgeon societies nor National Health Service ever provided any indication. CONCLUSION: Nowadays there is increasing demand for appropriateness in healthcare. This study delivered such significant data to make it a pivotal study for an extended analysis during 2016.

KW - Appropriateness

KW - Vascular Duplex Ultrasound

KW - Venous System

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85018286270&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85018286270&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85018286270

VL - 88

SP - 1

EP - 6

JO - Annali Italiani di Chirurgia

JF - Annali Italiani di Chirurgia

SN - 0003-469X

IS - 1

ER -